GNHLUG.Organizational - Automated notification of topic changes

2005-10-20 Thread Bruce Dawson
This is an automated email from GNHLUG. New or changed topics in GNHLUG.Organizational, since 18 Oct 2005 - 18:03: - MediaOutlets (TedRoche) http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/MediaOutlets Review recent changes in:

GNHLUG.Www - Automated notification of topic changes

2005-10-20 Thread Bruce Dawson
This is an automated email from GNHLUG. New or changed topics in GNHLUG.Www, since 18 Oct 2005 - 22:01: - OurChapters (TedRoche) http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/OurChapters Review recent changes in: http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/WebChanges Subscribe / Unsubscribe

Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Ted Roche
On Oct 20, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Bill Sconce wrote: As when Bill (inevitably) says, Since this is GNHLUG, and we're about 'Free', our shining server needs to be... Debian? The first shot across the bow! Bill, there's no 'F' in GNHLUG g,dr Just as a counter-proposal, might not one of the vendors

Are the bylaws too sparse?

2005-10-20 Thread Ted Roche
I had a couple of questions/concerns on the bylaws I haven't seen discussed. Forgive my naiveté on the matter - I have studiously avoided political structures whenever possible. Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence. 1. Number and composition of the Board

Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Bruce Dawson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ted Roche wrote: | Before we all start touting the clear superiority of a bunch of | distros that all run the same binaries, might we not want to | identify what we want to do with the box, what our parameters of | security/

Re: New Internet server

2005-10-20 Thread Bruce Dawson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ted Roche wrote: | On Oct 18, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Ben Scott wrote: | | Okay, so assuming everybody likes the idea, the next question is, | how do we begin setting this up? I'd like this to be as much of a | group effort as possible. Partly because