Hi everybody! (Hi Dr. Nick!)
I note that the Nashua group is supposed to have a meeting this
Thursday. Where'd that come from? :)
I know the Nashua group is in a bit of a transition right now, so
perhaps there's no topic scheduled yet, or maybe I just missed the
announcement.
Anyone know
For those who care, I have ownership of gnhlug.net and gnhlug.com,
domains and am willing to pass them over to Bruce/NHLW/GNHLUG/whoever
to continue. I got them after the slug.com/slug.org issues years back
(similar to whitehouse.com/whitehouse.gov). Currently they don't
point to anything, but
Ben Scott wrote:
Hi everybody! (Hi Dr. Nick!)
I note that the Nashua group is supposed to have a meeting this
Thursday. Where'd that come from? :)
I know the Nashua group is in a bit of a transition right now, so
perhaps there's no topic scheduled yet, or maybe I just missed the
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 09:58 am, Ben Scott wrote:
Hi everybody! (Hi Dr. Nick!)
I note that the Nashua group is supposed to have a meeting this
Thursday. Where'd that come from? :)
I know the Nashua group is in a bit of a transition right now, so
perhaps there's no topic scheduled
On Aug 14, 2006, at 17:58, Ben Scott wrote:
I feel that incorporating GNHLUG without their
consent would be something of a betrayal. At the same time, obtaining
their consent would be an administrative nightmare.
Devil's advocate: At this point they have no inalienable right to the
use of
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:47 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 10:04, Jeffry Smith wrote:
For those who care, I have ownership of gnhlug.net and gnhlug.com,
domains and am willing to pass them over to Bruce/NHLW/GNHLUG/whoever
to continue. I got them after the
On 8/15/06, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel that incorporating GNHLUG without their
consent would be something of a betrayal. At the same time, obtaining
their consent would be an administrative nightmare.
Devil's advocate: At this point they have no inalienable right to the
As one of the people who have put a lot of time and effort into GNHLUG, I have
mixed
feelings about the issue of having the new organization have a new name.
I would like to see GNHLUG evolve, and not have it the WEENIES go off to
form
a (possibly) competing group.
I do not mind having a
Jon maddog Hall wrote:
If we lose one or two people
in the process, this seems to be the problem of growth or change. If we lose
50% of the people in the process, then perhaps we have done something wrong and
should re-consider.
Bingo!
Ed Lawson
Here's a first pass at normalizing the MeetingIdeas and MeetingSpeakers
page:
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/
MeetingIdeasSpeakers
per Maddog's observation at the Summit that we have lots of redundant
data and repeated data scattered around the wiki. It could
On 8/15/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to see GNHLUG evolve, and not have it the WEENIES go off to
form
a (possibly) competing group.
Well, my intention, at least, is certainly not for duplication of
effort or competition, just stewardship. Indeed, in practice, I
Hi list,
Last night, at the SLUG meeting, I asked Rob Anderson if he would
have me as his alternate for SLUG (UNH/Durham). He agreed. So feel
free to bug me about things like meetings and planning for SLUG now,
too. :)
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/SLUG
-- Ben
12 matches
Mail list logo
