Bill Haneman píše v St 28. 06. 2006 v 17:36 +0100:
I'm not sure I agree that speech engines should not do their own audio
output. While I think you have identified some real problems with that
approach, it's not clear that the .wav file approach has a low enough
latency. If tests show that
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 21:34 +0200, Hynek Hanke wrote:
The modules inside the TTS
API implementation we are working on are supposed to run as separate
processes for licensing reason and for the reason of stability.
You answered my malformed question. :-) Thanks.
George (gk4)
Hi Hynek, All:
I'm not sure I agree that speech engines should not do their own audio
output. While I think you have identified some real problems with that
approach, it's not clear that the .wav file approach has a low enough
latency. If tests show that latency is not a problem, then passing
Luke Yelavich wrote:
Mind I ask when this is likely to be completed?
If you would like testers, I would be happy to put my hand up and try.
Hi Luke,
I hope to be able to make something available this week, but can't
promise, since I'm at Guadec and it might be hard to find some spare
time. If
I'm currently working on Speech Dispatcher backend for Orca. This
bypasses the Gnome Speech layer completely. Since Speech Dispatcher
offers several speech synthesizers not supported by Gnome Speech, this
may be essential for some people and the Orca - Gnome Speech - Speech
Dispatcher -
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:57, Olivier BERT wrote:
I'm currently working on Speech Dispatcher backend for Orca. This
bypasses the Gnome Speech layer completely. Since Speech Dispatcher
offers several speech synthesizers not supported by Gnome Speech,
Does Speech Dispatcher support something
Speech-dispatcher in general works well with screen readers. I am using it
with its generic module as I am writing this email.
It stops speech by killing the command-line program that is executed by
the generic module. This works better than one would expect.
When testing Orca or Gnopernicus, I
Hello,
I'd like to address a few points.
* First, as we discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if someone is
not subscribed, you are welcome to join), we want to create a new API to
access speech synthesis. This shouldn't be looked at as yet-another
speech API. Rather, we did some prototypes in Gnome
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 17:04 +0200, Hynek Hanke wrote:
talking to it via TCP.
Are commercial TTS engines sufficiently isolated in this new TTS API
proposal? With respect to licensing, can DECtalk and TTSynth be
successfully linked to and be used? gnome-speech is providing a nice
abstraction.
Enrico Zini wrote:
Hello,
In the meantime, however, before I hurt my brain too much with this,
what's the overall situation? Is it worth the effort of fixing
gnome-speech, or is the effort better spend on making something else
work?
Hi Enrico,
I'm currently working on Speech Dispatcher
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 07:14:01PM EST, Tomas Cerha wrote:
Hi Enrico,
I'm currently working on Speech Dispatcher backend for Orca. This
bypasses the Gnome Speech layer completely. Since Speech Dispatcher
offers several speech synthesizers not supported by Gnome Speech,
Mind I ask when
festival driver as well as test code for the festival C/C++ API,
so that I can gain familiarity with both things.
Any reasons why this hasn't been done yet?
In the meantime, however, before I hurt my brain too much with this,
what's the overall situation? Is it worth the effort of fixing
gnome
12 matches
Mail list logo
