Bill Haneman said:
I don't recall ever refusing to fix any corepointer
issues, for instance - at the time you asked, there were multiple
research efforts under way to try and address them.
Maybe I put that too strongly. You stated that the fix was to have a
second input device and were unwilling
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 16:38, Chris Jones wrote:
Bill Haneman said:
I don't recall ever refusing to fix any corepointer
issues, for instance - at the time you asked, there were multiple
research efforts under way to try and address them.
Maybe I put that too strongly. You stated that the
On 24/07/06, Bill Haneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern here is for GOK users who, without GOK, are unable to use the
system at all. In that respect, for this class of GOK user GOK is
indeed arguably the most important thing running on that machine.
I agree that SOK does not currently
