Hi,
The question if there should be an always-visible Power Off... status
menu item next to Suspend has been discussed to death already.
However, I do not want to bring up that same exact discussion again, but
propose a compromise solution, which I already mentioned in the bug
report
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 09.05 +0200, Denis Washington ha scritto:
Hi,
The question if there should be an always-visible Power Off... status
menu item next to Suspend has been discussed to death already.
However, I do not want to bring up that same exact discussion again, but
Am 20.08.2011 12:41, schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 09.05 +0200, Denis Washington ha scritto:
Hi,
The question if there should be an always-visible Power Off... status
menu item next to Suspend has been discussed to death already.
However, I do not want to bring up
Am 20.08.2011 13:08, schrieb Denis Washington:
Am 20.08.2011 12:41, schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 09.05 +0200, Denis Washington ha scritto:
Hi,
The question if there should be an always-visible Power Off... status
menu item next to Suspend has been discussed to
Quoting Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com:
The advantage of this solution is that the original intention of the
current design would be preserved - application state is never lost -
while making it easy for the user to save power if there is no state to
lose. If he or she doesn't like
