Please feel free to crunch the numbers, because I've got not idea, what
you are talking of.
Also a computer takes 10 seconds to power off, how is that a lot of time
?
And of course it is not reasonable at all to suspend when back in a bit
means tomorrow.
That is a waste of energy and
Thank you for the hard work you are providing. juste some first questions.
2011/6/21 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
Hey guys, it's Jasper.
As part of my work on SweetTooth[0], I'm planning on a bunch of
changes to make the user experience for installing, enabling and
disabling
. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:54 AM, ecyrbe ecy...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the hard work you are providing. juste some first
questions.
2011/6/21 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
Hey guys, it's Jasper.
As part of my work on SweetTooth[0
Hi jasper... are you really sure you want to have an http daemon just for
updating an extension?
why can't you have :
- a cron task for polling update check
- get the shell write to a cookie write the currently installed extensions
- use a javascript code for analysing the cookie information and
? if you could provide
something based on cokies (even if it's less elegant solution)
i think that it's a better one than haviong an http daemon.
Am i wrong here? sorry if so.
2011/6/23 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, ecyrbe ecy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
sorry i only replied to you, not the list and with a lot of misspelling, a
corrected answer :
2011/6/23 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:14 AM, ecyrbe ecy...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry, but i think that i miunderstood you or the contrary i don't konow
(sorry
2011/6/23 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:59 AM, ecyrbe ecy...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry i only replied to you, not the list and with a lot of misspelling,
a
corrected answer :
2011/6/23 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3
thank you john for the bits of history of the design.
i do know about server programming, as in fact it's my job to make high load
servers in c++.
i also understand the design better and the solution you try to provide.
as i said. you can make the server lightweight inside the shell, i don't
2011/6/23 John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:48 +0200, ecyrbe wrote:
thank you john for the bits of history of the design.
i do know about server programming, as in fact it's my job to make
high load servers in c++.
i also understand the design better
is there a place where this server lives so i can take a look to implement
the same behaviour in the shell?
thanks
2011/6/23 John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
It wouldn't be
running code when sleeping -- it would just be waiting on
select()...
don't
thanks, i'll do it this week end and upload the patch on the same bugzilla
for comparison (if libsoup works of course)
2011/6/23 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
Right now, see the patches in bug 653212[0]
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:54 AM, ecyrbe ecy...@gmail.com wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo
