On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:52 +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
What problems were you having? You might want to look at bamf
(https://launchpad.net/bamf) to help you.
I didn't really have applications matching issues, since the Shell
already needs to do this correctly anyway.
To wildly
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
As some of you may know, there's a bit of an issue with bamf, which is
that it requires a change to glib2 that, so far, upstream will not
accept. I'm trying to help resolve that (in, erm, diplomatic terms, not
code
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:07 -0500, Alex Launi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
As some of you may know, there's a bit of an issue with bamf,
which is
that it requires a change to glib2 that, so far, upstream will
Le lundi 06 décembre 2010 à 09:19 -0800, Adam Williamson a écrit :
I'm told that bamf could theoretically work without the patch (though at
present they haven't put a conditional in the code so it just fails to
build unless glib is patched), but it would be significantly less
accurate.
As
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:52 +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
What problems were you having? You might want to look at bamf
(https://launchpad.net/bamf) to help you.
I didn't really have applications matching issues, since the
