Il giorno dom, 11/09/2011 alle 16.40 -0400, Owen Taylor ha scritto:
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 14:57 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Some review comments reading
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno dom, 11/09/2011 alle 16.40 -0400, Owen Taylor ha scritto:
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 14:57 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin:
What is/will be the status for GNOME 3.2? I'm writing (together with
others) the release notes
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 14:57 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin:
What is/will be the status for GNOME
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 00:24 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin:
* I don't see any reason that this shouldn't just live in the
gnome-shell tree - that would at
Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin:
* I don't see any reason that this shouldn't just live in the
gnome-shell tree - that would at least reduce the problem
of the plugin and gnome-shell having incompatible versions.
It would also avoid having packages with the
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin:
* I don't see any reason that this shouldn't just live in the
gnome-shell tree - that would at least reduce the problem
of the plugin and gnome-shell having
