Re: gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

Snce these endorsements of a non-GNU document are repetitive, and do not foster any discussion topic, specifically since the GNU project is not going to adopt anything like this -- can you please recommend people to not post them here?

gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

Hello, I am co-maintainer of GNU Hurd. I endorse version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract proposed at . Samuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

Hi Samuel, On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 07:49 -0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I am co-maintainer of GNU Hurd. I endorse version 1.0 of > the GNU Social Contract proposed at > . Thanks for your support. You have been added to

Re: gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

There is no such thing as the "GNU Social Contract". The text to which you refer has no affiliation to GNU, is not a contract in any legal nor even colloquaial sense of the word. Furthermore it tries to impose upon people a very anti-social regime. J' On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:25:33PM

Re: gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

Hi Mark, On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 12:25 -0700, Mark Galassi wrote: > I am the founder and co-maintainer of the GNU Scientific Library, and of > Dominion, and I am GNU contributor since 1985. I endorse version 1.0 of > the GNU Social Contract, available at >

Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

The GPL is the social contract upon which this whole movement is based. It works because it doesn't interfere with everyone's various religions. These other "social contracts" are extraneous impositions, by people who worship whatever America's current religion is. On 2020-02-14 04:51, Ruben

gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

I am the founder and co-maintainer of the GNU Scientific Library, and of Dominion, and I am GNU contributor since 1985. I endorse version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at . Mark Galassi