Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
[...]
[0]: Many projects, specially system parts of GNU, have special
clauses or use the Lesser GPL to allow mixing with non-free software.
Tell me how does that work. Say on hurd (which doesn't have Linus'
exception to the GPL'd kernel). On what basis are all those
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:14:51 -0500
Alfred M. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You wanna write an app for our OS? Ask our permission first. Thank
you.
If you license your code under a Free Software license, then you
recived that permission[0]. The FSF doesn't care for people who wish
to
Stefaan A Eeckels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:59:23 +0100
David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefaan A Eeckels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tell me to respect the wishes of the author, and I'm all with you,
even if these wishes seem - at first sight - rather
Stefaan A Eeckels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I said earlier in this thread, it is _not_ a matter of law, but of
morality. It is abundantly clear that the FSF considers any form of
linking to a library as preparation of a derivative work, and as such,
we all should simply honour the wishes
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Suppose the Earth consists of constaneously combusting pink
cheese...
Okay. And your question is?
and _you_, of all people, call others stupid frequently.
My questions were meant to highlight absurdity in your org's line of
reasoning, genius.
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Dickopp wrote:
[...]
I have no idea what you're aiming at.
I'm not surprised.
Since it becomes subsequently clear that you have no idea what you are
aiming at either, hardly a surprise.
If the works of A and B are combined to form a
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it went for EURO 6.50 on ebay a couple of weeks ago.
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7133325141
A few years ago, I crossed a street at a red traffic light. Nothing
happend; I wasn't punished in any way. Therefore, it is now clearly
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Geez. Visit a clinic.
Are you this silly that you cannot even produce one message without
having to resort to personal attacks?
Yes, you're reading a mailing list. I'm reading and replying on
newsgroup.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:12:29 +0100
Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefaan A Eeckels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:37:43 +0100
Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find it unconvincing to argue that a program is not a derivative
work of a dynamic
: Found a form in HTML message
Found a script in HTML message
Note to Help Desk: Look on the MailScanner in
/var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20050314 (message j2EKq12u002406).
--
Postmaster
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
[...]
is not a derivative of the standard 'C' library, but that the
copy that is created at run time in memory is a derivative
work of both the source code and the standard 'C' library
(or for Alex, a compilation, but that doesn't matter because
the same protections
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can I ask all you guys a question? Can you keep the personal attacks
off the mailinglist/newsgroup/whatever? The copyright debate is at
least interesting, but I don't need my inbox clogged by this flame war
crap.
Thanks!
This message
12 matches
Mail list logo
