Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I should have said that copyright doesn't establish exclusive
right to designed to fit. Ok now?
Just from your words: To fit is one definition of adapt. Adaptation
is one form of derivative work. Derivative work is an exclusive right
of
Bruce Lewis wrote:
[...]
Furthermore, software that builds on but does not modify other software
could be described by any of the three verbs in or any other form in
which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted.
Copyright protects software as literary works. Things like builds on
are
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heck. Boy scouts. Hey boy, try thinking of real software derivatives
like human translations from one programming language to the other
with the same set of protected elements in both original work and
derivative work (which falls under
Bruce Lewis wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heck. Boy scouts. Hey boy, try thinking of real software derivatives
like human translations from one programming language to the other
with the same set of protected elements in both original work and
derivative work
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Lewis wrote:
[...]
Furthermore, software that builds on but does not modify other software
could be described by any of the three verbs in or any other form in
which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted.
Copyright protects
Bruce Lewis wrote:
[...]
Now you are citing someone who says Such innovations rarely will
constitute infringing derivative works under the Copyright Act.
Someone == United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Rarely implies it is possible.
That mild and polite wording doesn't subvert
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must be reading something that isn't there. The independent
status of the new copyright with respect to preexisting copyright(s)
in the sense that it does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration,
ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright
Bruce Lewis wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must be reading something that isn't there. The independent
status of the new copyright with respect to preexisting copyright(s)
in the sense that it does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration,
ownership, or
On 05 Aug 2005 09:04:01 -0400, Bruce Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I should have said that copyright doesn't establish exclusive
right to designed to fit. Ok now?
Just from your words: To fit is one definition of adapt. Adaptation
is
