Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
communities, and a look at the license distribution of registered
projects on freshmeat.
Ignorance rules the world. (So that smart ones can live better.)
Except that one can't license software by default. Licensing
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
But it is even more illusionary to think that for some reason, you are
the only unappreciated person with intelligence in the universe, and
Oh dear dak, recall that I'm a (so to speak) member of Wallace SWAT.
That makes us TWO of a kind as you must perceive (at
(That's what Wallace is lacking according to (drunken in a sense)
federal judges Tinder and Young.)
DRM Misunderstood
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 28 2006 @ 02:11 AM EDT
I explain the emotions, because the legal part of the GPLv3 makes no
sense what-so-ever if you don't
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 28 2006 @ 02:11 AM EDT
For all anyone can know, you could have written that.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Which mailing list was this correspondence taken from? Looks
interesting to me and I would like to subscribe to it.
On 7/28/06, Andreas K. Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Friday, dem 28. Jul 2006 schrieb David Kastrup:
Alfred M. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Authored by:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Anyway, the author does not understand GPL in either version. The
What? Linus doesn't understand the GPL? In either version? How
fascinating.
author of that diatribe would have his goals fulfilled better by using
the BSD license.
Recall that Wallace action will
