Hi,
On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 8:28:15 AM EET Jean Louis wrote:
> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-11-13 02:32]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 10:05:46 PM EET nipponm...@firemail.cc wrote:
> > > RMS could do it. Alot of what is required
On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 1:06:12 PM EET Jean Louis wrote:
> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-11-13 16:08]:
> > > Minix was made by Professor Tannenbaum. Minix 2.0 worked well and I
> > > remember using it. Now there is Minix 3 as full operating system.
> >
>
tly due to lack of time to answer
> any follow-up questions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 10:44 +0200, Alexander Vdolainen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > IMO GNU Hurd is a good thing to have, btw at the moment Hurd architecture
> >
> > isn't so good:
>
468 hours per year, making
about 2-3.8 months of full time job ... let me think ... am i ready to waste
this time for another then-will-be-forgotten attempt ? i'm not, do you ?
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
The evil contractor.
computers
> and anything between.
That's one of my points.
microkernel is a way more advanced design, yep, but it's the same way harder
to design and implement. And from technical point of view GNU Hurd design
isn't so nice ...
> در November 12, 2019 8:53:42 AM UTC، Jean Louis نوشت:
> >
is non-white, etc. i
> >> think if Linux (the kernel) followed OpenBSD's rule of 0% political it
> >> would be better, but that is not going to happen. i really do hope GNU
> >> Hurd will be completed because Linux is just a mess, it also doesnt give
> >> me a good impression that i have to use Linux-Libre because Linux
> >> includes firmware blobs within the source tree.>
> > ---
> >
> >> rbt.asia/g/thread/73515455/#q73516323
> >> Goodbye, Linux.
> >> Hello, GNU Hurd!
> >>
> >> (There were some criticisms though:
> >> ( >RMS stopped programming years ago )
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
The evil contractor.
me political views I
> wouldn't to
>
> btw, init system used in guix is very nice from my point of view.
>
>
> Fannys
>
>
> Oct 14, 2019, 23:03 by a...@vapaa.xyz:
>
>
>
> On 10/14/19 10:57 PM, František Kučera wrote:
>
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 12:00:09 AM EEST Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> If systemD is be hard to replace, that is a kind of lock-in. But it
>> isn't _vendor_ lock-in. systemD, like most free software packages,
>> is not tied to any particular vendor. Indeed, the usual concept of
Hi,
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:31:18 PM EEST marinus.savorit...@tuta.io
wrote:
> I agree completely about Systemd. Corporate interests are too controling
> over it. I don't know how we could remove elogind and eudev and the likes.
> GNOME doesn't seem to eager to even consider the forks,
On 10/14/19 10:57 PM, František Kučera wrote:
> Dne 14. 10. 19 v 19:54 Alexander Vdolainen napsal(a):
>> It looks like a xinetd new feature, but - do we really need a dbus?
>
> I wrote only one D-Bus service and quite simple, so I do not feel
> capable to say how muc
html
>
> "The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1)
> that users should have control of their own computing (for instance,
> through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in
> computing."
>
> Let those few people NOT represent GNU project, as GNU project never
> harassed anybody in this manner, and let us not allow selected few of
> them to destroy those good feelings of community.
>
> Jean
>
PS sorry for my offensive english here.
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ix, FSF and RMS for the thought crime. See
>> the book 1984
>>
> I think there's more to it than thoughts. I think RMS said something
> offensive and has made MIT a toxic environment for women for many years.
>
Where did you get this bullshit ?
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
ly minded etc ) around RMS (or anybody else).
>
>
>
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 10/12/19 4:27 AM, Kete wrote:
> On 10/11/2019 04:43 PM, Alexander Vdolainen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/11/19 11:16 PM, Kete via Discussions about the development of the
>> GNU system wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2019 05:02 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
>> ... skippe
;
>
> (I've been using religion and homophobia as an arbitrary example.
> Should anyone feel upset by this choice of example, please tell me in
> private or otherwise so I can switch to another example. Although I
> don't wish to write much more on this off-topic topic...)
>
>
> - Taylan
>
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 10/12/19 10:09 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Can everyone move this discussion elsewhere? Seeing that this is not
> related to the GNU system or Guix.
>
Where? Why ?
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi again,
On 10/14/19 9:59 PM, Jesse Gibbons wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 21:32 +0300, Alexander Vdolainen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/14/19 9:16 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2
o their own tastes.
>
> As with all free software, if someone feels that some software is not
> KISS (enough) or not *NIX (enough), they can avail themselves of their
> four freedoms and modify that software as they like, and distribute it
> to anyone else they like.
>
>
>
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
l also need to rewrite and
redesign a lot of code because of systemd.
It's lock-in.
>
> در October 14, 2019 6:32:13 PM UTC، Alexander Vdolainen
> نوشت:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/14/19 9:16 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at
e I studied various
> init systems and compared them. So if something is already happening or
> done, I would be happy to hear about it.
systemd is defective by design, but widely used - and it might be a
reason other init-systems hasn't advance yet.
>
> [1] yes, I know that it co
d firstly
>
>
> Franta
>
> P.S. I might missed some news. It is some time since I studied
> various
> init systems and compared them. So if something is already
> happening or
> done, I would be happy to hear about it.
>
>
> systemd is defective by design, but widely used - and it might be a
> reason other init-systems hasn't advance yet.
>
>
> [1] yes, I know that it collides with the xinetd/inetd name
> which means
> „internet daemon“ and AF_UNIX != AF_INET, but…
>
>
> --
> Alexander Vdolainen,
> Evil contractor.
>
>
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
Evil contractor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/14/19 10:11 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 21:32 +0300, Alexander Vdolainen wrote:
>>> For example, no aspect of either GNOME or systemd are proprietary,
>>> using the common meaning of the term. Also, "lock-in" usually refers
>>&
d to test a few ones, so, microkernel is a best one.
btw, if youäre interested in more info, contact me personally.
thanks,
--
Alexander Vdolainen,
The evil contractor.
Hi,
On Monday, 22 June 2020 16:22:23 EEST Ro Ba wrote:
> I just wanted someone to notice this:
>
> https://github.com/remysaissy/examour-exokernel
>
> From what I understood It's an attempt to a GNU exokernel.
Exokernel is a good idea on the paper while you're on the coast. However, it
has a
Dear nipponmmail (or someone's hiding under the email cover),
I'm going to agree with many of your own concerns, however let's keep this
list with a *technical* discussions only. Just because this kind of activity
only supports stupid sjws movement to make technical things politicized.
25 matches
Mail list logo
