Op donderdag 11 mei 2023 02:44:50 CEST schreef john:
> Nope, never have. We don't in Windows or Flatpak either: It's whatever
> MinGW-W64 or the Gnome Runtime of the month hands us.
>
> Regards,
> John Ralls
>
True for Windows, though for flatpak that's subtly different. You explicitly
choose a
Nope, never have. We don't in Windows or Flatpak either: It's whatever
MinGW-W64 or the Gnome Runtime of the month hands us.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On May 10, 2023, at 9:43 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> Ok, my guess was close enough.
>
> That implies we're not really tracking what version
Ok, my guess was close enough.
That implies we're not really tracking what version of gtk-osx is used to
package gnucash
releases ? That's a surprise to me.
Regards,
Geert
Op woensdag 10 mei 2023 16:19:39 CEST schreef john:
> Geert,
>
> Nope, those changes are
>
Geert,
Nope, those changes are
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk-osx/-/commit/2e5e2a4712ee7f222f9342e6a8d8a941e41dcd8d.
There is a change in gnucash-on-osx, but it's just bumping the release number
in Info.plist...and I had forgotten to push it.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On May 10, 2023, at
Hi John,
Thanks for the updated dmg.
I saw mails passing by for your update to the htdocs repo. However I didn't see
similar mails
for the gnucash-on-osx repo. I presume you had to make at least a change in the
gnucash.modules file over there as well to add the patches or change the gtk
There's a gtk3 regression in Gnucash-5.1-1. Nobody's reported hitting it yet,
but it's there: I left a patch out when I updated gtk3 to 3.34.37 just before
the 5.1 release. I've re-packaged with a correctly-patched library. This also
has a patch to fix
