On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:31, m...@simplercomputing.net said:
Anyone know if it's possible to generate a subkey for signing purposes
via batch operations or a script? I can't seem to find anything that
references a way to do that.
No. You need to employ the --command-fd/status-fd mechanism to
Hello Robert,
thank you very much for your quick answer.
I already looked at truecrypt and also many other whole disk
encryption/encrypted virtual drive software, but they always mount the
drive after entry of the password and then everyone with the correct
password has random access to the
It would seem like a fairly trivial thing to code, just have whatever
is writing the file pipe it to GNUPG with the appropriate settings and
write output of gpg to disk. I don't think there if a front end that
does it for you though, some custom code seems unavoidable but
depending on your precise
On 6/29/2010 10:36 AM, Dirk Walter wrote:
It would seem like a fairly trivial thing to code
The desired use case is to have a folder on disk where anything written
to that folder will be piped through GnuPG first. You've already got to
deal with drag and drop, the possibility of multiple
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
(snip), and so on and so on. You can probably
hack together a userspace solution that kind of works, but to do it
right you really need a kernel driver.
That depends on the source of the files, if you have eg a
On 6/29/2010 1:25 PM, Dirk Walter wrote:
That depends on the source of the files, if you have eg a java app
that is generating the files it would be trivial to pipe it through
gpg, similarly if it is done through an ftp server or something it is
also trivial.
That is not the use case I read
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Dirk Walter
dirk.wal...@semanticbits.com wrote:
It would seem like a fairly trivial thing to code, just have whatever
is writing the file pipe it to GNUPG with the appropriate settings and
write output of gpg to disk. I don't think there if a front end that
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, David Shaw wrote:
I presently consider synchronization broken. If there were only one
network of keyservers out there, and I didn't have to search multiple
places when trying to sign or request a key, I might think otherwise,
but this is not the case. See my alternate
On 6/29/10 5:44 PM, Roscoe wrote:
I wouldn't have thought a GnuPG FUSE FS would be very hard.
The surest way to discover whether something is easy is to try it. If
it's easy, then it's easily done. If it's not, then it's not.
I don't want to sound as if I'm putting myself up as some kind of
On Jun 29, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Roscoe eoc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Dirk Walter
dirk.wal...@semanticbits.com wrote:
It would seem like a fairly trivial thing to code, just have whatever
is writing the file pipe it to GNUPG with the appropriate settings and
write
10 matches
Mail list logo
