you are absolutely right. The implementation of the kerberos
which comes with ON bits tightly integrated with NFS and CIFS
services, provides pam module, and actively maintained by
opensolaris community.
What _exactly_ are the differences? If I'm not completley wrong, the Sun
kerberos
You could track changes to krb5 here:
http://hg.genunix.org/onnv-gate.hg/log?rev=krb5
but this is only for files matching krb5 phrase. In reality it is much
more differences then the above link showing.
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:18 +0100, Fredriksson, Ulf wrote:
you are absolutely right. The
Am 07. Mar 2009, um 13:12:12 schrieb Tim Spriggs:
Tim,
As has been pointed out, the sun kerberos package has several extensions
that are required to get some solaris features to work. I assume that
would include eg. tickets for kerberized NFS for the NFS client in
kernel space would need access
Mario,
you are absolutely right. The implementation of the kerberos which comes
with ON bits tightly integrated with NFS and CIFS services, provides pam
module, and actively maintained by opensolaris community. We should have
it installed and offered by default.
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:46
Mario Lorenz wrote:
I guess I would prefer ubuntu as a baseline, if only for the reason that
all packages that possibly are ported likely have debianish/linuxish
expectations. For instance, I still find myself calling ps twice,
because the first time it complains -axu aint there. Thank god
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 20:07 +0100, Mario-Lorenz wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some of the mail-related packages, and found some issues
that I would like to ask which the better way for a fix would be.
a) fetchmail doesnt build because it can not find krb5-config.
It can not find it because
Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 20:07 +0100, Mario-Lorenz wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some of the mail-related packages, and found some issues
that I would like to ask which the better way for a fix would be.
a) fetchmail doesnt build because it can not find krb5-config.
It can
