I just received this, because I am the maintainer of the RePEc OAI
gateway http://oai.repec.org. With around 80 records, it is is
one of the largest OAI-PMH providers by number of records.
This rather confusing mail hints that the inclusion of OAIster in
FirstSearch. It appears to
Jonathan Rochkind writes
I read this as saying that
Why do we have to do OCLC astrology? Why can't they say clearly
what they want to do?
If OCLC stopped providing the free access points to OAISter that we
are used, that would be a problem. Doesn't sound like this is
happening.
One small point - I don't suppose there's any chance they could change the
acronym? COPE is pretty well established as the Committee On Publication
Ethics?
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Heather Morrison [mailto:hgmor...@sfu.ca]
Sent: 18 September 2009 05:12
To: American Scientist Open
