Assuming that I am not alone in my concern about over-reliance on Beall's
list, perhaps we can find a solution that targets this specific problem without
more work than is really necessary? One thought for a remedy: could we find a
way to crowdsource objective, dispassionate scholarly
Dear Eric,
Though I agree simply accepting one man’s list is not sustainable, I doubt
creating yet another list is the best way forward. There are already so many
lists out there. Every new initiative seems to dilute and weaken efforts.
Please let’s just try to tie the initiatives together
Dear
Wouldn't be a good practice of us to edit collaboratively and openly
such a list either on wikipedia or on github, 2 different but
convenient system for collaborative editing with full track records
(aka the system logs who add waht and when) ?
Today, in many circumstances, wikipedia
Jeron makes some excellent points ... I would hope that we could stop lumping
all subscription journals together and distinguish between non-profit society
journals and commercial journals.
Dana L. Roth
Millikan Library / Caltech 1-32
1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125
626-395-6423 fax
Hi Jeroen
Good point. I don’t necessarily argue for a new list, improving/merging
existing tools may indeed be the way to go.
Eric
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen)
Sent: October-04-15 12:03 PM
To: 'Global Open Access List
