It is easy to cherry-pick some examples of where this might work and not be
problematic. This is useful as an analytic exercise to demonstrate the
potential. However it is important to consider and assess negative as well as
positive possible consequences.
With respect to violation of author's
Thanks Heather for your continued comments! Good stuff in there. Some
responses below:
> HM: Q1: to clarify, we are talking about peer-reviewed journal articles,
> right? You are planning to annotate journal articles that are written and
> vetted by experts using definitions that are developed
Dear Heather, all,
Just a few comments below in your post.
Jeroen Bosman
Original message
From: Heather Morrison
Date: 13/07/2018 17:54 (GMT+01:00)
To: "Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)"
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Why translating all scholarly knowledge for
Further questions / comments for Jason Priem (JP) and anyone who cares to
participate...
JP: So the first part will be the annotation of difficult words in the text,
which is just a mash-up of basic named-entity recognition and
Wikipedia/Wikidata definitions. Pretty easy, pretty safe.
HM:
