I've changed the subject line for this message and I hope the moderator of
this forum will let it stand even though it breaks the thread. I do not wish
to be associated in any way with the sentiments of those previous comments
about the management of this list. No doubt Jean-Claude will also wish
Hi,
The HAL archive in France which hosts a number of institutional
repositories has a similar system for several years with arXiv
(researchers can tick a box and the paper is submitted to arXiv as
well). Connections also exist with PubMed Central and ADS for
instance.
Heaven help me for thus wandering between the trenches but there is no doubt
that Stevan is an uncommonly combative polemicist, as anyone who has challenged
his perceptions of orthodoxy knows. Still, one of the guilty pleasures of
lurking on AMSCI has been to watch the fisticuffs. As a
I will save the time of the subscribers of this list by just saying that I
completely subscribe Alma Swan message, and their sensible and reasonable
points.
Eloy Rodrigues
Universidade do Minho - Serviços de Documentação
Campus de Gualtar - 4710 - 057 Braga
Telefone: + 351 253604150; Fax: +
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:52 AM, Andy Powell andy.pow...@eduserv.org.uk wrote:
To be fair, I think Jean-Claude is primarily accusing you (Stevan)
of summarising his arguments back to the list incorrectly rather
than censorship per se,
No, actually I think he thought I had not posted his
I fully support Stevan as moderator of the AmSci OA list. The job of a
moderator is to censor. There is no other word to describe the job they
are asked to do. Censorship is not always a bad thing, provided it is
applied appropriately. Stevan has disagreed with me a number of
times on the focus of
It seems pertinent to ask why my own posting on the subject has not been
forwarded to the list...
Sally
Sally Morris
Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy)
South House, The Street
Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Tel: +44(0)1903 871286
Fax: +44(0)8701 202806
Email:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:43 AM, S Nieminen s.niemi...@bradford.ac.uk wrote:
Hello All,
Does anyone have concrete examples of where openly accessible papers in an
institutional repository have increased their citation numbers from pre-IR
days? I am putting together some advocacy materials and
Hello again,
If I can add a quick addendum to my list of UK-based projects looking at
the interaction between institutional and subject repositories, a
colleague has reminded me of another relevant project.
'Options review of the ways in which institutional and subject
repositories can
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
The truth is on both sides. I did believe Stevan had not posted my
message because it showed up late in my in-box. At the
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
I believe that my position is now clear. The long delay in seeing my
message appear in my own in-boxled me to believe that
On 3 Oct 2008, at 08:27, Muriel Foulonneau wrote:
The HAL archive in France which hosts a number of
institutional repositories has a similar system for
several years with arXiv (researchers can tick a box and
the paper is submitted to arXiv as well). Connections
Hi,
I do not know whether the mail I am replying to went to the whole list,
but it is written like it was intended to.
* Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com note le 03-10-08 :
I have several times returned the postings of Bernard Lang to him as
not relevant to the American Scientist Open Access
13 matches
Mail list logo
