Dear All,

We have recently finished a study which we believe provides a new important 
angle on the issue of predatory publishing of scholarly OA journals. Since the 
process from submission to publication in a journal may take a long time, we 
have opted to upload the preprint working paper already now to arXiv. While the 
review process may entail some changes to the text of the article, the main 
results and conclusions are likely to remain the same. Feel free to resend this 
message to colleagues you think might be interested.

Bo-Christer Björk, Sari Kanto-Karvinen and J. Tuomas Harviainen

How Frequently are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited

Abstract

Predatory journals are Open Access journals of highly questionable scientific 
quality. Such journals pretend to use peer review for quality assurance, and 
spam academics with requests for submissions, in order to collect author 
payments.  In recent years predatory journals have received a lot of negative 
media. While much has been said about the harm that such journals cause to 
academic publishing in general, an overlooked aspect is how much articles in 
such journals are actually read and in particular cited, that is if they have 
any significant impact on the research in their fields. Other studies have 
already demonstrated that only some of the articles in predatory journals 
contain faulty and directly harmful results, while a lot of the articles 
present mediocre and poorly reported studies. We studied citation statistics 
over a five-year period in Google Scholar for 250 random articles published in 
such journals in 2014, and found an average of 2,6 citations per article and 
that 60 % of the articles had no citations at all. For comparison a random 
sample of articles published in the approximately 25,000 peer reviewed journals 
included in the Scopus index had an average of 18,1 citations in the same 
period with only 9 % receiving no citations. We conclude that articles 
published in predatory journals have little scientific impact.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.10228

Best regards Bo-Christer

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to