On 11/02/2009 21:37, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
The short email conversation says nothing on CREAM OF SCIENCE. Don't
confuse DARE and Cream of Science which is a subset of DARE.
Cream of Science showcases prominent research from the Netherlands.
The website lists the names of
There is an article of a scholar (German studies) against OA in the
leading German newspaper arguing that mandates (he cites ZORA) and the
Konstanz request to deliver a full text when sending the data for the
university bibliography ar against academic freedom. Read it in
Google's English:
Klaus Graf:
It is wrong to think mandates are the only way to fill
the
repositories... Cream of Science project in the NL had
a very
high OA rate.
Despite the enormous value and importance of Netherlands Cream of
Science and the DARE project, its
2009/2/11 Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com:
Klaus Graf:
It is wrong to think mandates are the only way to fill the
repositories... Cream of Science project in the NL had a very
high OA rate.
Despite the enormous value and importance of Netherlands Cream of Science
and the DARE project,
On 6-Feb-09, at 10:38 AM, Tomasz Neugebauer wrote:
[snip]
When a researcher makes the decision to publish/provide access to
their work, the emergent properties of the repository are a relevant
consideration. Consider the following hypothetical situation: a
researcher in Buddhist studies may,
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On Behalf
Of Bernard Rentier
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:53 PM
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Repositories: Institutional or Central ? emergent properties and
the compulsory open
On 07-Feb.-09 at 14:18, Klaus Graf wrote :
2009/2/6 Bernard Rentier brent...@ulg.ac.be:
1. Universities may legitimately own a repository of all the
publications by
their employees, no matter what their statutes can be, they may
also impose
a mandate and simply enforce it by making it
I would like to complement Tomasz Neugebauer's enlightening message.
It is useful to observe that fragmenting the opposition while
maintaining united one's own side is an important strategy in general
(divide and conquer) and it is constantly and masterfully practiced in
the area of OA.
For
2009/2/8 Bernard Rentier brent...@ulg.ac.be:
On 07-Feb.-09 at 14:18, Klaus Graf wrote :
2009/2/6 Bernard Rentier brent...@ulg.ac.be:
1. Universities may legitimately own a repository of all the
publications by
their employees, no matter what their statutes can be, they may
also impose
a
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Klaus Graf wrote:
Bernard Rentier:
Universities may legitimately own a
repository of all the publications by their
employees, no matter what their statutes can
be, they may also impose a mandate and
2009/2/6 Bernard Rentier brent...@ulg.ac.be:
I believe we are getting carried away here.
My point was much simpler...
1. Universities may legitimately own a repository of all the publications by
their employees, no matter what their statutes can be, they may also impose
a mandate and simply
Research repositories, whether they are a physical library, an electronic
journal archive, an institutional repository or a subject repository, are
collections of interconnected components. Understood in this way, as systems,
they have emergent properties. That is, properties of the
I believe we are getting carried away here.
My point was much simpler...
1. Universities may legitimately own a repository of all the publications by
their employees, no matter what their statutes can be, they may also impose
a mandate and simply enforce it by making it conditional for futher
13 matches
Mail list logo
