What many now refer to as predatory publishing first came to my attention 7
years ago, when I interviewed a publisher who - I had been told - was
bombarding researchers with invitations to submit papers to, and sit on the
editorial boards of, the hundreds of new OA journals it was launching.
To get an idea of the size of the problem of ‘predatory' publishers, does
anybody know:
a) the proportion of papers published each year in ‘predatory’ publishers
compared to the total number of papers published worldwide; or even
b) the proportion of papers published each year in ‘predatory’
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:24 AM, David Prosser
wrote:
> To get an idea of the size of the problem of ‘predatory' publishers, does
> anybody know:
>
> a) the proportion of papers published each year in ‘predatory’ publishers
> compared to the total number of papers
Of course being trapped by a predatory publisher is a terrible thing for an
individual. Just as sending your bank details to a Nigerian oil scammer and
ending up being ripped off is a terrible thing. And some of these ‘publishers’
are behaving reprehensibly.
But I think we have the right to
Nobody said he was inventing the problem. I just want to know the size of it.
So what’s your definition of ‘tiny’ Stevan? I would say if articles in
‘predatory’ journals make up less than 5% of total number of paper published,
or of papers published in Gold OA, or even of papers published in
Hi David,
Even if anyone knows the answers to your questions they will not capture the
nature and size of the problem of predatory publishing, not least because
the way in which these companies extract money from researchers is mutating
all the time.
For instance, some have started to
Hi all
if you look at Walt Crawfords fantastic work on OA-journals (
http://citesandinsights.info/) I think it fair to say that we are talking
about 5% of papers published in fully OA-journals charging APCs - I have
not done the exact calculations
cheers
Lars Bjørnshauge
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015
Of course being trapped by a predatory publisher is a terrible thing for an
individual. Just as sending your bank details to a Nigerian oil scammer and
ending up being ripped off is a terrible thing. And some of these
'publishers' are behaving reprehensibly.
But I think we have the right
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Lars Bjørnshauge wrote:
> Hi all
>
> if you look at Walt Crawfords fantastic work on OA-journals (
> http://citesandinsights.info/) I think it fair to say that we are talking
> about 5% of papers published in fully OA-journals charging APCs - I have
Dear David and dear all !
A short contribution from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) based on the data
underlying of this very short paper:
http://beta.briefideas.org/ideas/f2e9ebaa34cd5655203c7de332618061
>From a sample of 683 OA articles with APC coming out of FWF funded projects
>between
Thank you for taking this on, Richard.
One thought is whether it would be in the best interests of OA to welcome and
encourage internal critique. Perhaps if we were quicker to denounce predatory
practices, we would have more credibility when we support true friends of OA
(to me, this of
Dear all,
An opportunity has come up in the Office of Scholarly Communciations at
Cambridge University. Details available here
http://www.jobs.cam.ac.uk/job/8079/
The University of Cambridge is seeking an enthusiastic, experienced
individual to work within the Office of Scholarly
12 matches
Mail list logo