Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-09-13 Thread Dirk Pieper
d include length, language, formats, linking > >> within articles), etc. If anyone has time and energy to conduct > >> research in this area, there is plenty of work. > >> > >> best, > >> > >> Heather Morrison > >> > >> > >

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-09-13 Thread BURNHILL Peter
+44 (0) 131 650 3301 Mobile: +44 (0) 774 0763 119 From: goal-boun...@eprints.org <goal-boun...@eprints.org> on behalf of Dr. Shu-Kun Lin <l...@mdpi.com> Sent: 13 September 2016 04:20 To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) Subject: Re: [G

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-09-13 Thread Dr. Shu-Kun Lin
(qualities could include length, >> language, formats, linking within articles), etc. If anyone has >> time and energy to conduct research in this area, there is plenty >> of work. >> >> best, >> >> Heather Morrison >> >> >> ----

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-09-13 Thread Éric Archambault
e and energy to conduct >> research in this area, there is plenty of work. >> >> best, >> >> Heather Morrison >> >> >> Original message From: Dietrich Rordorf >> <drord...@gmail.com> Date: 08-08-2016 1:48 AM (GMT-

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-09-12 Thread Dr. Shu-Kun Lin
has time and energy to conduct > research in this area, there is plenty of work. > > best, > > Heather Morrison > > > Original message From: Dietrich Rordorf > <drord...@gmail.com> Date: 08-08-2016 1:48 AM (GMT-05:00) To: "Global > Open A

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-08-08 Thread Heather Morrison
2016 1:48 AM (GMT-05:00) To: "Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)" <goal@eprints.org> Subject: Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016 Dear Dr. Morrison, I think that you make a very strong assumption of equal distribution of journal sizes, which to me does not hold up to a

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-08-07 Thread Dietrich Rordorf
Dear Dr. Morrison, I think that you make a very strong assumption of equal distribution of journal sizes, which to me does not hold up to a reality check. Because of this the "average" APC you compute is three to four times lower compared to what authors/institutions actually pay to MDPI per

Re: [GOAL] MDPI APCs 2011 - 2016

2016-07-29 Thread Peter Murray-Rust
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Heather Morrison < heather.morri...@uottawa.ca> wrote: > A preliminary version of our MDPI APC longitudinal study is now available: > https://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/2016/07/29/mdpi-apc-fdp-2011-2016/ > > > It is useful to get these prices. (I comment that