On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:45:33AM +, Ton Hospel wrote:
Ok, this one is now finished too.
There is no post-mortem link yet, but you can find it at
http://la.pm.org/cgi-bin/PGAS/post_mortem.cgi?id=1
Can someone explain to me why the winning solution of
-li0 $,=pop;sub
Welcome the first Team to enter the golf contest.
They did a nice first try with a total of 117.42 Points.
But unfortunately they have a broken mailserver:
| 554 5.0.0 MX list for taipei.pm.org. points back to geb.elixus.org
| 554 5.3.5 Local configuration error
You should fix that, so I can
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:08:51PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
That seems a bit unfair for people who were planning on being in a
team but in their eagerness to get cracking have already submitted
solutions. Couldn't they just be removed from the individuals board
on transfer?
I have no say
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:55:11AM -0400, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:39:53PM +0200, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
BoB could be. But as the best scores per hole are known, that does not
add any new information, so BoB decided that he would post his best
solution that
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:09:11PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
Stefan `Sec` Zehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You should see the golfer names when hovering with your mouse above each
Spot.
Jasper and I are both in London, UK (same flat, in fact). I notice
that our identical coordinates
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:41:52PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
I really tried to beat Mr. Escaped Quote[tm], but as I have to leave
now, and won't return until the end of the tournament I have lost that
quest...
I actually lied. I took printout with me, just in case. So when I sat
over
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 05:13:56PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:09:11PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
Jasper and I are both in London, UK (same flat, in fact). I notice
that our identical coordinates are both included in the image map
HTML, but of course his dot
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 08:43:50PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
Here is my 39,
#!perl -p
y/!b/
/;s!\d(?=\d*(\D))\D?!$1x$!eg
Isn't that a 40?
Here is mine. It is only one char longer than yours, I counted it as 41.
#!perl -p
y/!b/
/;s/./$;+=$;$;=$x$;if$1/ge
CU,
Sec
--
Do not meddle
Really. I've been playing golf for 4 hours straight now, and have
produced an really unreadable mess now. I really wonder what I'm missing
here, as Ton seems to have absolutely no problem using a whopping 40%
less characters than me.
And with Yanick idling along near the bottom, I'm really
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:31:59AM -0400, Yanick wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:58:10AM -0700, Phil Carmody wrote:
Note - I think I should be sandtrapped presently as _none_ of my
solutions work with
0 1
1 2
2 3
Ah, the test case for which I have cursed the referees' name
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:37:18AM -0400, Yanick wrote:
Could you please stop waving those bones at the crowd and
put them back in the closet, where they belong? Thank you
very much.
At first I was a bit jealous of not beeing 'one of them' - But now I'm
actually happy beeing unnoticable
Moin,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:19:20PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En op 28 augustus 2002 sprak Sec:
Finding (and printing) all words (from stdin) with all of a set
of given letters (on the command line, for simplicity) appearing
once in the first 10 characters of the word, and
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:31:05PM -0400, Keith C. Ivey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very interesting, Keith. Perhaps Stephen, who's debutante
post revealed a sound understanding of Teutonic languages,
might like to translate it into English for the golf
historians. ;)
No,
Hi,
while playing with ton-s winning golf entry, I noticed
perl -le 'q=(1,2);map{print $_ for q}@q'
dumps core for me in 5.6 and 5.00503. Now I really wonder why this might
be, it sure looks sane to me. Does anybody have an idea? :)
It doesn't core if q contains only one element...
CU,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 03:50 +0300, Juho Snellman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:34:32PM +0100, McGlinchy, Alistair wrote:
Puzzle: Write a one-liner longer than (say) 3 bytes that can improve
on 0.77 distinct warnings per byte of code. The program should be -c
valid, output nothing
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 13:39 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Regards,
Shlomi Fish (who would now be working hard on optimizing his
relatively long solution)
It took me quite some time to reach you, but after spending some more
hours playing around, I finally found the trick for a
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 20:34 +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 13:39 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Regards,
Shlomi Fish (who would now be working hard on optimizing his
relatively long solution)
It took me quite some time to reach you, but after spending
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 15:08 -0800, Rick Klement wrote:
Care to share for those of us who are so golf deprived
we are actually discussing *indentation*.
As there is an actual prize involved, I'm inclined not to forward it
here before the contest is finished %)
CU,
Sec
--
This is where
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:13 +, Jasper wrote:
Now, as an afterthought, am I the only person to have missed the
perlgolf history book, and the only person who submitted a score that
didn't have something like : $;.=5x$_*8%29628
No. Look at \'anick for example (poor \'anick :)
I had once
19 matches
Mail list logo
