Isn't the qualifier for the beta logging read command --verbosity (not
--severity)?
gcloud beta logging read --limit=1 --verbosity=none
However, when this is used it still produces a log in the ~/.config
directory that contains all log level entries, including "INFO" level.
Perhaps I have
Thanks for the info. We have no use for the gcloud beta logging tool's log
files, and would like to disable them.
Right now we are simply deleting them after the command terminates, but we
would like to avoid such a heavyweight approach, not to mention the
considerable I/O load they cause to our
at least 10 hours with the gcloud
tool, which is another problem entirely!)
Right now I am simply deleting the log files created in the .config subdir,
after our download job finishes, but this is a rather crude fix!
Thanks,
Julian
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, 'George (Cloud Platform Support)' via
We are trying to migrate from request_logs to the "gcloud beta logging
read" system.
When downloading logs using the beta command, we find that simultaneously
there are large files being created in:
~/.config/gcloud/logs
For example, downloading logs for our GAE app from yesterday, we have
n Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:37 PM, 'Nick (Cloud Platform Support)' via
Google App Engine <google-appengine@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hey Julian,
>
> You have two options here: either to wait for the google.cloud library to
> get support for V1 logs, or adopt a slightly differ
ing.Client()
for entry in client.list_entries(order_by=DESCENDING):
print entry
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:39 PM, 'Nick (Cloud Platform Support)' via
Google App Engine <google-appengine@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hey Julian,
>
> I've obs
google.cloud.logging can't understand
the log format it fetches from our GAE deployment?
We've now been without access to our log data for almost a week, so I'm
getting quite desperate to find a solution either with request_logs or
cloud.logging :-)
Thanks for your help.
Julian
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017
Right now we cannot use the request_logs feature for downloading our GAE
logs (see my other thread on that problem!), so I thought I would try the
newer google.cloud features, and get modern :-)
Here is the simple test I tried:
from google.cloud import logging
from google.cloud.logging import
on the Google servers? I'm wondering if
it's related to the fact we don't use StackDriver logging, and the push
seems to be towards that?
Julian
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 1:24:40 PM UTC-7, Staffan Rolfsson wrote:
>
> Hi, I got problems to deploy on 1.9.51 (updated from 1.9.48),
> and a
Hi Nick!
It's still occurring as of one minute ago ... using release 1.9.50
Julian
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 11:41:47 AM UTC-7, Nick (Cloud Platform
Support) wrote:
>
> Hey Julian,
>
> What version of the SDK are you using? And is this still occurring?
>
> Cheers,
>
&g
We have a process that uses the request_logs feature to download logs from
our GAE app for archival. This has stopped working unexpectedly in the last
couple of days, apparently due to an oauth2 authentication issue. I'm not
sure if this is a problem at our end, or on the GAE side, and I'm
we can do to
prevent it happening in the future (i.e. force instances to only run the
latest production release of the SDK)? Is there an application setting
somewhere?
I apologize if this is the wrong Group for such questions.
Many thanks!
Julian
--
You received this message because you
clients
to fail, and a greatly increased Error rate from our app.
Julian
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 2:22:08 PM UTC-7, PK wrote:
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> Google routinely does this when they release a new runtime that they
> believe it is backwards incompatible. It mostly wor
Issue 12272:
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=12272
Let me know if it needs any elaboration.
Thanks again,
Julian
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Nick (Cloud Platform Support)
pay...@google.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
So, after some extensive testing and reading around
competence :-)
Julian
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Nick (Cloud Platform Support)
pay...@google.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
So, after some extensive testing and reading around online, it appears
that this is no longer possible, and I encourage you to make a public
issue tracker feature request
http
(System.out);
where authCookie is the token obtained from loginToGoogle above.
Thanks so much for helping with this!
Julian
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Nick (Cloud Platform Support)
pay...@google.com wrote:
A quick question, is it possible you could provide the skeleton code for
your
/url-pattern
/web-resource-collection
auth-constraint
role-nameadmin/role-name
/auth-constraint
/security-constraint
These are the two endpoints I need to call from the client.
Thanks again!
Julian
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 1:28:20 PM UTC-7, Nick (Cloud Platform
Support) wrote:
Hi
apparently need to use OAuth2, but there is no documentation that
seems to match my use case, unhappily. Use cases seem to assume the use of
various Google APIs, which I am not using.
Thanks anyway.
Julian
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Nick (Cloud Platform Support)
pay...@google.com wrote
.
Thanks for the pointers to the documentation, which I'd already visited and
read but ended up being confused - as is no doubt evident from my question
:-)
Julian
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 4:57:26 PM UTC-7, Nick (Cloud Platform
Support) wrote:
Hi Julian,
You've produced an excellent
I have a GAE application with an endpoint that requires authentication,
which I need to call from an application (rather than from in a browser). I
was using ClientLogin, but that is now obsolete, so I have set up a Service
Account in the Google Console, and stored its keypair .p12 file so
it is
company.nore...@gmail.com.
Is there any way to use nore...@company.com to send mail from GAE again?
We are currently working on setting up remote SMTP from within our GAE
instance, but it would be nice if there was a better way.
Thanks,
Julian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Same problems.
1. Dashboard works, but takes ~30s to load
2. Requests are running at usual speeds, not an issue for me
3. Deploys are timing out
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 10:55:58 UTC+2, Alexandru Farcaş wrote:
Hi,
I have problems with my application:
1. The Dashboard
Aaad it seems to have been fixed.
On Friday, 29 November 2013 09:04:03 UTC+2, Julian Kent wrote:
Same problems.
1. Dashboard works, but takes ~30s to load
2. Requests are running at usual speeds, not an issue for me
3. Deploys are timing out
On Thursday, 28 November 2013
2 seconds is confirmed as not hanging over 30+ runs. I'll be away for a
week, but when I'm back I'm going to try 1 second.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
Wow. OK, if it was happening to you with only 2 memcache set_multi_async
calls, I'm generally doing over 200 in the course of 8 minutes or so, each
with ~32 elements. I've added delays between them now, so it is now 300
over 15 minutes each with 20 elements.
Vinny, I haven't hit the error
guys that there is an edge-case bug here that
slipped through their QA testing?
Thanks
Julian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google
() call ;-)
Also, this handler only terminated because I did a manual shutdown of the
instance. In the log I linked you see the /_ah/stop being called just
before the memcache.set 'woke up' after being hung for 2 hours.
Thanks for the help
Julian
On Saturday, 24 August 2013 05:05:33 UTC+2, Vinny P
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 00:23:30 UTC+2, Vinny P wrote:
What does the variable *botsdict* represent? Based on the naming and
function calls, I assume that it's a dictionary, but what type of objects
is it containing? Is it possible that the contained objects are doing some
kind of
I have a batch processing Backend (B4) which does a bunch of
unpickle/pickle and Numpy/array stuff. Recently I noticed that I was
getting much higher backend charges, which would hit quota almost every
time, so I migrated to Modules (also B4), thinking that might solve it.
However, I still see
Hello,
We've been trying to deploy a new version of our app to AppEngine for most
of the day and the status page says that things are back to normal but that
doesn't seem to be the case for us.
Is the issue that caused the problems earlier today still being looked into?
--
You received this
, prakhil samar prakhilsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
Thanks for your information.
I am trying to upload a CSV file which contains some special
characters (Unicode characters which are not in the ASCII range). The
following is the data which the CSV file contains:
Name Address
The issue below is related:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2878
For apps using custom domains having to test different versions on
appspot.com can cause problems with cookies and OpenID identities.
On Apr 26, 9:21 pm, Vladimir Prudnikov v.prudni...@gmail.com wrote:
Not ideal but not the end of the world either. This delay might be
needed to combat fraud which is a big difficulty for electronic money
services.
On Apr 17, 2:47 pm, Daniel danielshaneup...@gmail.com wrote:
Every single time I try to up my quota, and pay a bit more for
appengine, google
I am not sure about the mathematics of it, but intuitively there is no
perfect algorithm for constructing timestamps in a reverse
lexicographical ordering, because adding a character to a string will
always make it lexicographically superior.
But I noticed the mapreduce library just pick a
This one year old thread discusses the same problem I think:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/b35a0387dfdf918b/55563f57306defbc?lnk=gstq=mark+as+read#55563f57306defbc
A possible solution:
class Message(db.Model):
sender=db.StringProperty()
Your model won't work if one message can have several recipients. Is
this OK?
And is there a particular reason why you create an entity group for a
user and its messages ?
You only need an entity group if you plan to update different entities
transactionally.
Also, you might be interested by this
Hi Richard,
Check out Rietveld, it is open source and could be a good base for
building your project:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/rietveld.html
On Dec 21, 12:47 am, Richard richar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for something simple I can customize to integrate with our
Yes I also thought about this when denormalizing. And this could be
generalized to a whole model by serializing it into a protobuf
StringProperty.
This is probably best for models with infrequent writes, like a User
personal information.
On Dec 9, 7:06 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com
You can star the issue I filed a while ago about this:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3301
On Dec 8, 4:22 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, but don't think this is a feasible solution
for a real world application.
Is it possible
GAE is not designed for performing complex queries on a dataset.
It is possible to get it to work by anticipating what queries you will
need and building the corresponding indexes, but it is not easy nor
flexible, and the complexity of the queries would be limited.
Why not start with a relational
Wow a lot of work packed there, congrats App Engine team!
I'm surprised about the new 10 minutes deadline on Cron and Task
Queues. A short while back you were explaining that long-running
requests are bad for the App Engine ecosystem. Is it not the case for
Task Queues or are you just confident
Back in July, and even after a maintenance before that I noticed a
significant lower latency in the few days right after the maintenance.
It never last though, so we should probably wait a few more days
before assessing the results. I wonder what kind of changes in
BigTable could cause a temporary
understood by the developers.
Now if they even do substitute this with a new site I doubt early
developers will go and resubmit their work.
So I only hope Google reconsiders this, fixes the problems related to
spam and classification of appls and restore the site.
On Nov 6, 5:17 am, Julian Namaro
An App Gallery is a great idea but Google's one looked like a weekend
project thrown out in the wild and was pretty useless.
There was a lot of spam, unhelpful reviews, and occasionally you could
see Desktop software (running only on Windows, not even cross-
plateform) with a whole bunch of
The first number is used for average latency, not cpu_ms, and the auto-
scaling threshold is computed only from user-facing request, not tasks
or crons.
Your numbers seems quite good, nothing to worry about I think. Are you
experiencing a specific problem ?
On Oct 23, 12:22 am, Matija
Sounds like a cold start problem. I don't have experience on this but
there are some advices in the forum. If your app grows to have
sustained traffic it will improve for sure, but when starting or for
low-traffic sites the problem remains. I see that there's a feature on
the App Engine Roadmap to
Romage,
It's not straightforward but if you create a config file using
Automatic Configuration you'll be able to specify a format for the
downloaded data:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html#Configuring_the_Bulk_Loader
On Oct 6, 11:26 pm, romage
You can perform an AND query on a ListProperty without a custom index.
I think it's called merge-join.
Have you tried InventoryItem.all().filter(keywords =,
keyword1).filter(keywords =, keyword2).filter(...) ?
Julian
http://www.memobuild.com
On Sep 24, 3:56 am, jorge jorge.velazq...@gmail.com
You can perform an AND query on a ListProperty without a custom index.
I think it's called merge-join.
Have you tried InventoryItem.all().filter(keywords =,
keyword1).filter(keywords =, keyword2).filter(...) ?
Julian
http://www.memobuild.com
On Sep 24, 3:56 am, jorge jorge.velazq...@gmail.com
busting solutions.
Julian
http://www.memobuild.com
On Sep 21, 3:23 am, Tzach tzach.livya...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a strange issue with a CSS file: although it is available, it
is not executed.
Does anybody encounter this problem?
Here is the CSS:http://sudoku-solver-online.appspot.com
Thanks Tim, I had the same problem today and your solution worked.
Maybe the documentation(http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/
config/appconfig.html#Custom_Error_Responses) should make it clear to
not put the custom page in a static folder.
On Aug 18, 12:53 pm, Tim Hoffman
for the
constant improvements of the platform. Thank you, and please, do keep
it up!
Julian Namaro
http://www.memobuild.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com
I thought SSO for the marketplace was one of the goal of the built-in
OpenID login, but I haven't tried yet.
Somebody can confirm it works ?
On Aug 30, 9:26 pm, Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 29, 11:33 pm, gops wrote:
I think pure openid is possible( just login ). but
You can add:
sys.path.insert(0,/path/to/google_appengine/lib/fancy_urllib)
..in the script where you're calling remote_api.
On Aug 23, 5:15 am, Ryan Weber ryan.we...@gmail.com wrote:
Hitting the fancy_urllib issue with remote_api too. Has anyone found a
fix/workaround for this (other than
Hi There
searchWords is a List of User entity that contains All tokens?
the filter in de JDOQL WHERE searchWords == \+tag.toUpperCase()+.
find some token in all elements on the List property ???
Thanks !!
On 2 jul, 06:49, RAVINDER MAAN rsmaan...@gmail.com wrote:
we can set it in following
in Java ?
Julian
On May 25, 5:41 am, Duc Anh Nguyen geruk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We just have completed the demo version of our Java app on GAE.
Generally, our idea is to make a website that helps you improve your
debugging skills. And for our school project, it should be a game, so
we
What about:
try:
mail.send_mail( ...)
except Exception, e:
logging.error( str(e) )
return
On Apr 2, 2:44 am, GAEfan ken...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, just received the 3rd bcc, 34 minutes later.
So the question is, how can I put an email in the taskqueue, and have
the task not re-executed
What do you get if you specify the rate per second ?
Also are you sure each task sends only one email ?
On Jan 15, 5:19 am, Emanuel Berglund emanuel.bergl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for your reply,
Supposedly the bucket_size: should be 1 and not 8 according to this
It is unlikely someone would mark as spam an e-card from somebody they
know. Maybe some company use your service to send spam ?
Make sure users of your service need to create an account(with a
captcha) and set a daily limit for number of e-card sent.
On Dec 23, 5:30 pm, Krystox krys...@gmail.com
If you send all the mails at the same time maybe you hit the 10
mails / second quota.
If that's the case, use a task queue to send emails and you'll be able
to control the rate of execution.
On Dec 24, 2:04 am, Alexander Arendar alexander.aren...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
My app supposed to send
I don't think an index can help you for that.
See Robert's solution or if the list of categories doesn't change
often, you can just hardcode it in the Python/Java script.
On Dec 22, 9:01 pm, Diogo Terror ranc...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way I could query the index contents, such as:
I have
Hi Marco,
Maybe you got an error precisely because the id was unavailable.
A quick google search returns 2 results for artezel - at - gmail
App Engine namespace is shared with other google applications like
gmail.
On Dec 16, 9:20 am, Marco Antonio da Silva Castanheira
mcastanhe...@globo.com
Well technically there is only one datastore for all apps.
Google servers make sure you cannot access data from other apps, but
we can imagine that they will allow it for specific cases in the
future.
And different entities with the same name can co-exist because all the
keys of your app contain
Eric,
Sorry my previous answer was wrong. The query time increases with the
number of entities fetched faster than I thought.
From a small benchmark in Python average time for your query is
150-200ms.
This is for fetching 130 entities of about 400 bytes, with 5
properties each, using an
Is there value in putting the MessageRead entity in the same entity
group as the message?
Just to do transactional mark as read. I agree in most cases it's
not worth the trouble.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post
There is a better solution to this problem.
You can use a special entity MessageRead with no property and a
key_name= message_id + recipient_id
indexes = keys_only query on MessageIndexes
for k in indexes:
keys.append( k.parent() )
keys.append( db.Key.from_path('MessageRead', k.parent().id()
Hi Eric,
Of course this kind of performance is in no way normal.
Such a simple query typically takes below 50ms.
So either there is a problem in your code, or you hit a bug in the
java SDK.
I suggest you post a more complete code sample in the App Engine Java
group.
And no need to be
How is this better than a read then a write outside of a transaction ?
Anyway it looks like there will be specialized tasks for transaction
across entity groups in the future.
On Dec 1, 4:32 am, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this would meet your needs or not, but it might
Question 1: When you define a chain of ownership between an entity and
child entity, is the entity group defined at the root entity level or
the kind level. For example of you have kind called Book and a
child kind Chapter defined. If you have a Book entity named
Intro to AppEngine, and
, ussuri michael.glas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 19, 9:57 pm, Julian Namaro namarojul...@gmail.com wrote:
The datastore is 100% reliable even if the datastore Java/Python APIs
might not be.
What framework and libraries do you use? Is this live on appspot.com
or the local dev server? It looks
The datastore is 100% reliable even if the datastore Java/Python APIs
might not be.
What framework and libraries do you use? Is this live on appspot.com
or the local dev server? It looks like there is an unauthorized write
somewhere.
If you can reproduce the problem consistently, try to locate
Traditional relational databases are not scalable, and using such
library would most likely result in a data organization that does not
scale well. Might be fine for a lot of apps, but it kind of defeat the
main purpose of using a cloud infrastructure.
On Nov 18, 9:54 pm, frankabel
I'm not sure about what you want to do but just a thought: have you
considered Amazon Elastic MapReduce ?
It's sure doable with task queues but you're likely to encounter
various limitation problems as you cite.
On Nov 18, 1:46 am, James Cooper jamespcoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm evaluating
I believe the only way to do that would be to use something like a
Greasemonkey script (cf.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasemonkey#Equivalents_for_other_browsers).
On Oct 29, 1:34 pm, saneef san...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to add the link to newly made Google App to the
Google
I think this problem is discussed there:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=313
Julian
On Aug 7, 4:30 am, Cornel corneliu.lupu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I'm using app engine to write a business application. I've read
that during a transaction one can modify only
idea:
1. [datastore]Traverse the index and to get entity keys
3. [datastore] Batch get of entities
So you would save step 2, a roundtrip app engine - datastore, not sure
that's substantial though.
Julian
On Aug 6, 1:05 pm, tav t...@espians.com wrote:
As a developer we have various limitations
that you pass on to the random generator).
Julian
On Jul 10, 1:33 am, aloo aleem.maw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a GQL query that returns N random records of a
specific kind. My current implementation works but requires N calls to
the datastore. I'd like to make it 1 call
Hi Jason,
I'm up to 9 apps now and I have a couple more in the pipeline, so I
was wondering if I could get my allocation increased? Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide with this.
Julian
On May 1, 1:57 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi Tim. I'm sorry, I misunderstood
? If there is write
contention, you could divide alphabetically, by languages, etc..
Julian
On Apr 9, 1:15 am, Jonathan Feinberg e.e.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Long ago I attracted a flame-fest when I expressed my opinion that
adding support for other programming languages should be given less
priority
You might want to have a look to this App Engine video by Ken
Ashcraft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP99fLhGwAU
App Engine scales, but not instantaneously, so if you want to do a
large number of requests in parallel, you need to increase the volume
gradually.
Julian
On Apr 3, 4:26 am
.
Julian
On Mar 26, 7:27 am, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
The article is now obsolete and should be removed, it explains how to use
the bulk upload tool that was available at launch.
Recently, we released an improved version of the tool, which is what the
second document
it is written that their purpose is to Imports CSV data
over HTTP.
What is the difference?? I cannot figure out.
Julian
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email
82 matches
Mail list logo
