@GAEfun I bet you got to change your nickname pretty soon, as I have
to say sorry to my blog readers :-(
http://gaengine.blogspot.com
On Sep 1, 6:37 pm, GAEfan ken...@gmail.com wrote:o
And, where is the always on feature in this list? Is that the
reserved instance hours?
Correct me if I am
@Tim +1
On Jul 8, 4:39 pm, Tim meer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Thursday, July 7, 2011 8:14:57 PM UTC+1, Greg D wrote:
I'm happy to give clarification, but I need a little more information on
the sort of clarification you want. When you say what GAE is aimed at, do
you mean
Stephen +1
The situation is that 'App Engine for Business' has been renamed
'App
Engine' and 'App Engine' as we knew it does not exist any more.
This describes the situation we are in.
Problem though is: 'App Engine for Business' has not been really tried
in the battlefield.
On Jul 5, 12:12
@Nickolas Daskalou + 1
except for the part of free quotas.
You need those in order to attract developers to try out the platform
and build up the eco system.
Without a strong healthy ecosystem no platform can survive for long.
Still there are other solutions to this (i.e. limit to 1 year or less
@Ikai +1
I'm glad this process is in place, but I'd rather let 10
abuse apps sit around longer than they should than avoid shutting down
a
legitimate user.
Nick Milon
On May 24, 4:54 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Ben,
I understand your frustrations, but do realize that
I am following the posts closely since the very beginning and haven't
noticed any thread or individual post disappearing, same applies to
app-engines blog.
Nick Milon
On May 23, 8:15 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
As far as I know, we're not deleting threads about this topic. Do
+1 bill by : cpu cycles + memory used + may be overhead of spinning
new instances.
it is not only about savings by optimizing it helps the environment
too. This is what I call green computing.
Nick
On May 22, 11:54 pm, Danny Tuppeny da...@tuppeny.com wrote:
On 22 May 2011 21:39, Anders
Very interesting question:
Is MapReduce still a flexible solution on AppEngine under the new
pricing model ?
My answer: probably not, new pricing model makes mapreduce operations
a no - no. Price will be prohibitive for such operation especially
ones that depend on many instances to run a job
@Jeff
I would question any comparisons that ends like If you’re going to
buy a VPS I’d appreciate it if you used my referral page for Linode or
for Slicehost when doing so.
I would prefer a donate button and most probably I would contribute.
Nick Milon
On May 19, 9:55 pm, Jeff Schnitzer
Lots of talk and fighting here with developers comparing App Engine vs
AWS vs Rackspace vs any_other_VPS_service_on_earth.
There was not such big talk before, coz App Engine looked different
from those products both in terms of pricing as well as features.
Now, thanks to latest news, it managed to
own.
Jeff
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:34 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
@Jeff
I would question any comparisons that ends like If you’re going to
buy a VPS I’d appreciate it if you used my referral page for Linode or
for Slicehost when doing so.
I would prefer a donate
@Raymond + 1
This is what I also think.
App engine is moving closer to an IaaS rather than a PaaS service and
I believe this is not really good move.
see here :
http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2011/05/new-app-engine-pricing-policy-good-bad.html
Nick
On May 18, 10:14 am, Raymond C.
@Sergey good questions.
IMHO this is a sisyphean task, new policy has opened Pandora's box
with questions popping up from it in a much faster rate that can be
answered.
Nick
On May 18, 11:06 pm, Sergey Schetinin ser...@maluke.com wrote:
A couple more questions for the FAQ:
1) What are the
New App Engine Pricing policy, the good the bad and the ugly.
http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2011/05/new-app-engine-pricing-policy-good-bad.html
Happy coding :-)
Nick Milon
On May 10, 8:29 pm, Ugorji ugo...@gmail.com wrote:
Did App Engine suddenly start costing a minimum of $45 per month?
+ 1 to more granularity in every way possible.
15 minutes looks more like IaaS not PaaS.
Nick
On May 15, 8:02 pm, Vinuth Madinur vinuth.madi...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/15 Luís Marques luismarq...@gmail.com
That is indeed an interesting suggestion, but I suspect it might be
unworkable at
@daodao
Greg who ?
On May 13, 8:33 am, daodao daoda...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the solution. Thanks Greg. It's the problem that my account was
recently changed to a new type of account.
The solution is:
1.Login my admin account of my custom domain (mail.mydomain.com)
2.go to Google Apps
Well this is hard to answer.
Things look very liquid right now especially for python apps.
IMHO that you wait a little till all the dust, raised of new pricing
model and infrastructure (scheduler etc.) changes, settle.
Only then we will have a clear view of which way we are heading.
Also lot
@Brandon Wirtz
All this can't be explained by you upgrading to 1.5 as @Stephen
writes.
@Vinuth Madinur +1 for all your points especially minimum
granularity.
;-)
Nick Milon
On May 13, 4:28 pm, Tim meer...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently all my python scripts use the script-or-module mechanism as
Expanding @Stephens thoughts and given the new granularity 15 min (how
in the world we moved from ms to minutes is a wander to me) a lot
about pricing will depend on scheduler and I can foresee fights here
every time scheduler algorithm changes in future handicapping this or
the other type of
.
On May 13, 2:44 pm, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Well this is hard to answer.
Things look very liquid right now especially for python apps.
IMHO that you wait a little till all the dust, raised of new pricing
model and infrastructure (scheduler etc.) changes, settle.
Only
+1
On May 12, 6:20 pm, Tim meer...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, Google is not a charity, but equally I thought they had a vested
interest in bringing developers on board using their technologies and APIs.
Here's a suggestion
free is a quota like the new quota, 24 instance hours etc
@Nischal +1
What you are asking is what @TIM above is suggesting which myself also
endorse.
Also as I can see many others in this list are proposing something to
this effect.
Happy coding :-)
Nick Milon
On May 12, 7:36 pm, Nischal Shetty nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote:
GAE now has Free and
I am not 100% sure but
I feel all of those issues are related to conflicting accounts
mentioned here:
http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=181691
And googles forced transition that happened on May 11.
take care :-)
Nick
On May 11, 12:25 pm, Warren
+1 for best sentence by Brandon so far
You are a Prius driver complaining that the
Ferrari doesn't have a Continuous Variable Transmission, and that the
Ford
F350 doesn't have remote trunk unlock on the key fob.
On May 10, 11:54 pm, Darien Caldwell darien.caldw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well,
+ 1
Old model was much more on the green side.
Now we have to optimise for the new model.
On May 11, 12:11 am, Spines kwste...@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly, with the new pricing, gets and puts will now cost the same?
I liked the old model that encouraged efficiency.
On May 10, 1:50 pm, Spines
Brandon, nice work great page and texts there - hope you manage
with new pricing model.
On May 10, 2:13 am, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
Good catch on the what is a CDN question.
I was trying to decide if I want the customer that thinks I'm cheap :-) .
It's like Cars or
. Those would
stop in 30s right? So, what exactly is this 10 minute limit, I haven't been
able to wrap my head around the 10 minute thingy.
On 26 April 2011 00:58, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
1) the 1000 entities (rows) limit has been lifted long time ago.
2) tasks
1) the 1000 entities (rows) limit has been lifted long time ago.
2) tasks are not limited by the 30s limit - can run for 10 minutes.
Happy coding ;-)
Nick
On Apr 25, 9:01 am, Nischal Shetty nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote:
I will indeed try a few ways to do this. But pulling all rows
One major advantage of GAE it is that is more green than alternatives.
Charging by resource usage (cpu cycles, bandwidth etc) forces us to
energy efficient programming style.
Also I am sure G datacenters are much more efficient than someone's
LAMP stack.
Nick
On Apr 25, 8:42 am, Niklas
+1
On Apr 16, 9:02 pm, n8gray n8g...@gmail.com wrote:
Ikai,
I totally understand that you guys want to focus on the interesting parts of
the problem, but you could make one really simple change that would probably
*solve* the problem for most of your users: allow us to set the DKIM header
+1
On Apr 16, 10:06 pm, Adam Sah adam@gmail.com wrote:
Ikai-- totally agree re:bulk email, but please please please add DKIM, which
(I'm told) is 90% of the solution for
enterprise/extranet apps that need to use email for workflow. The Big
Reason I chose AppEngine was to get
an
, Google App Engine
Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO a proxy will complicate things.
What about if GAE team gets in touch
/RyJ9w
On Wednesday, April 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, nickmilon wrote:
May be you can delegate the geocoding job to the client side using
js ?
also you can take a look here
:http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/11/world-countries-and-ip-geocoding...
ml
Nick ;-)
On Apr 6, 7:25 pm, Joe Tyson joety
May be you can delegate the geocoding job to the client side using
js ?
also you can take a look here :
http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/11/world-countries-and-ip-geocoding-api.html
Nick ;-)
On Apr 6, 7:25 pm, Joe Tyson joety...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This seems to be more of a problem
although you can find it here:
http://googleappengine.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/python/google/appengine/ext/db/__init__.py
I agree it is not well documented, although it it very useful, since
it behaves as all other properties (can be included in indexes etc.)
:-)
On Apr 2, 1:14 am, walter
you need something like:
News.all().filter('created_at.month ',datetime(2011,3,31,23,59))
but..
your result set will be ordered primarily on created_at coz you are
using an inequality filter, if you do not mind that then ok.
IMHO a better solution to your problem would be if you use an
://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:43 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Ikai,
By the way did you sent the invitations for server feature ?.
I have sign the NDA sent to me by Google
Ikai,
By the way did you sent the invitations for server feature ?.
I have sign the NDA sent to me by Google Ireland some weeks ago and
heard nothing since then.
Nick.
On Mar 29, 7:59 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
No, servers should be available for both Python and Java.
@Greg +1
See also here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/6b3857fc12a23621
On Mar 25, 4:53 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 3:31 pm, Broc Seib broc.s...@gmail.com wrote:
There is mention of using Amazon's SES with more success.
I'd prefer
How do you know ?
I guess you have to wait till the end of the month to see if it really
works.
just joking ;-)
On Mar 24, 9:26 am, 王宇辉 yuhui.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Bob,
It seems runs well
2011/3/22 Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com
Hi,
Have you tried:
cron:
@Icai
I agree on most of what you write above, and I understand that you
prefer to focus on more important things, also having run Email
services for enterprises in the past I do know it is not trivial.
But
still I believe Email service is a major asset for GAE and dropping
it (or anything
IMHO it is not a good policy for GAE to abandon(?) services middle way
instead of improving - enhancing those. ;-(
Regards
Nick
On Mar 23, 7:31 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
That sounds like a good idea. There's a good chance we'll change the quotas
for email sometime in the
@Marzia
Long time now see:-(
Nice to see you back in the group.
On Mar 23, 10:13 pm, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote:
Hi Adam,
Apologies for the delay in response.
I'm going to bump this limit for your app. In general Barry is correct that
this limit is able to be increased by
@ctran
I tried that with a dataset of around 190K items couple of times - No
Errors No warnings
but
as @Francois is writing I have also seen other people in the group
that complain.
On Mar 20, 9:06 pm, Francois Masurel f.masu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried the Copy to another app option
If caching does not work in HR this is a real problem.
Could it be by design ?
Have others observed this ?
happy coding:-)
Nick
On Mar 19, 10:32 pm, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
So they are all in one place, here are the things I know to be an Issue with
HR:
1. Caching
nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see the Datastore Admin link. Is it available for GAE/J ?
-N
On Mar 19, 4:32 am, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
@Brandon +1
@nischalshetty you can make a backup to an other appl of yours without
writing a single line of code - control
I also think deleting data is quite cpu intensive and expensive
process, different techniques described above by Tim, Wesley, Ikai and
others give only marginal benefits.
There are some use cases where we deal with ephemeral data and all
entities of a model are obsolete-irrelevant after some time.
+ 1 to Ikai for making up and been so open.
and some thoughts :
1) Before making HR de facto standard, a simple (just press a button
and wait - no need foor alias) migration path should be devised for
legacy MS appls.
2) Pricing - although new price can be acceptable for frequent used
I have faced same kind of problem some time ago.
I tried some of the solutions suggested here (in memory sort and
filtering, encoding things into keys etc. and I have benchmarked those
for both latency and cpu cycles using some test data around 100K
entities)
An other approach I have taken is
As Tim above suggests Remote API is a very flexible and powerful tool
that I feel is been overlooked by developers, it is ideal for some
dirty one time or repeated jobs. Of course it has some drawbacks (high
CPU and bandwidth consumption) but still very handy at times.
Nick
On Feb 7, 5:19 am,
Look for an answer in this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/4ad4fc5d05ed6198
Nick
On Feb 5, 8:45 pm, عيد القرني mlk33...@gmail.com wrote:
this site ((http://proxyfly1.appspot.com/http/blog.glaksa.com/
07chat)) its the same site of my website and appear in google
P.S.
Just checked and I think your worries are over now ! probably some
body sorted out for you.
On Feb 8, 1:44 am, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Look for an answer in this
thread:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/4ad4fc5d05ed6198
Nick
On Feb 5, 8:45 pm, عيد القرني
Same thing here configuration: Linux - Chrome
Enabled Chrome's third party cookies and worked - then disabled it
again and works OK
So it is not about disabling 3rd party cookies but just switching
state solves the problem (at least in my case)
Nick
On Jan 23, 8:09 pm, orange80
Very useful this posting of IRC Trancripts - to people like me who are
not able to attend coz different time zones or many other reasons.
So please keep posting those.
On Jan 21, 12:34 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Hey guys, below is the transcript for January 19th,
Wish a happy 2011 to fellow coders and GAE team ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
False alarm then.
+1 IKai for cleaning the mess although I was sure it was something
like this.
On Dec 20, 11:08 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
I'm working with him off-list to resolve the issue.
In general, it's important to remember that as application developers, you
Somebody (Ikai L if I remember well) even mentioned sub-400ms as
optimal number.
I agree we need more light on this.
For the complete (almost) story of those numbers you can take a look
at my
post here:
http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/09/app-engine-scalability-issues.html
Happy coding :-)
Nick
themselves?
On 7 December 2010 22:36, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the question is not hypothetical any more and a new
government request is coming soon:
The Tunisian government, known for its restriction on freedom of
expression, rapidly blocked the access to Tunileaks
technology
based on BitTorrent or something similar.
Happy coding. ;-)
Daniel Guermeur
-- superco...@gmail.com
Co-author of App Engine Java and GWT Development:http://bit.ly/hdTHyB
Blog:http://supercobrablogger.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com
There is a lot of talk and flame wars going on AWS vs GAE topic, up
to now all this talk was concentrated on technical and economic
issues.
News of Amazon throwing away the WikiLeaks website has raised new
arguments on the cloud battlefront.
So I want to raise here the hypothetical question what
would still like to hear something from a Googler. If this is how it
works then it means that stress testing the application (with a lot
more pressure than it will normally get) may lead to worse (!)
performance permanently.
On 24 Nov, 00:01, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote
Icai, I was for an opt-in solution but IMHO One way disable button is
also OK and also it takes into account the interests of newbies.
On Nov 24, 10:51 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Trust me, we thought out all the scenarios. Here are the scenarios:
1. Just enable it in
Not been a Googler can't help much with this.
Having said that, I suspect there is a kind of build in algorithm that
does some kind of application profiling taking into acount QPS,
response times, and other parameters which adjusts instance life time,
number of instances to start etc..
This could
+ 1 to Tim Hoffman
I followed his advice (albeit with some delay I regret) last time that
I had some issues and my problem was sorted out by App - Engines team
in 7 hours although it was a weekend if I remember well.
On Nov 22, 9:52 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Do you
Same here
App ID: geognos
Language: python
On Nov 19, 2:07 am, Zeynel azeyn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 7:00 pm, Peter Warren pe...@nomad.org wrote:
+1
I just tried and I got 500 error
Error 500: --- begin server output ---
htmlhead
meta http-equiv=content-type
://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:15 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Same here
App ID: geognos
Language: python
On Nov 19, 2:07 am, Zeynel azeyn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 7:00 pm, Peter Warren pe...@nomad.org wrote
Deployment Working again for apid geognos.
On Nov 19, 2:59 am, Sundar cyberto...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that it's back to working order, I'm curious about what happened. I'm
sure I'm asking prematurely and that Ikai/Google-Guys will update in a few
mins.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM,
+ 1
Impressive performance gains - congratulation to Google and App Engine
team.
Lets hope current performance will be a benchmark for the future.
On Nov 7, 12:17 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out the datastore stats after today's maintenance...
Julian: - I do agree that some contents of the gallery were garbage or
spam application not even running on GAE, along with some really cute
applications. . This was a real problem but instead of fixing it (not
a very difficult task) they just dropped it without notice.
Also the gallery was a
This is not a good thing if it isn't down by a mistake or something.
Developers contributed there, then out of a sudden see their writings
disappearing !
On Nov 4, 11:14 pm, MLTrim michele.trimar...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you know why App Gallery is no longer available?
1) thats the way it works through google appls where you can register
your existing domain or buy a new one.
2) You can use the free Google apps Standard addition, you are not
forced to use the Premiere edition.
On Oct 31, 7:57 pm, Rodrigo Teixo horariofa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everybody!
Wrong group here -
On Nov 1, 6:21 pm, Jay Levan iamj...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no idea if this is where I'm supposed to post this issue but
this is where I was lead.
I was trying to post a question in Google Labs about a calendar feature
and the app returned
a Server Error and took me to
Did you took a look in python csv package ?
http://docs.python.org/library/csv.html
you can import it
configure then configure a reader parser to match your input files
specs.
:-) happy coding
On Oct 31, 9:14 pm, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Like I said, I am not a Python
)
195.97.105.127 - nickmilon [29/Oct/2010:08:41:20 -0700] GET /_ah/
datastore_admin/static/img/help.gif HTTP/1.1 500 1268 http://
5.latest.geognos.appspot.com/_ah/datastore_admin/?
app_id=geognoskind=AppSetingsDickind=NM_DScashekind=_AE_MR_MapreduceControlkind=_AE_MR_MapreduceStatekind=_AE_MR_ShardStatekind
The App Engine team has declared all clear now At 8:10PM PST but it
seems this is not the case with my Application.
I am still experiencing a high proportion (15% of all requests) of
500s like the following:
-
10-28 02:17AM 13.897
Appl id:geognos
appl version : 5
language :python
live instances at the time: 2
loading request: no
A typical normal operation for this request :
10-27 09:47AM 08.920 /api/countries/info/CL.json 200 17ms 19cpu_ms 0kb
MSIE 15.0,gzip(gfe)
195.97.105.127 - - [27/Oct/2010:09:47:08 -0700] GET
Same issue with me while trying from Chrome.
Cleared cookies - no lack.
Works OK from Firefox.
On Oct 18, 2:19 pm, Andrius andriu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
when I try to open datastore admin page in google app engine admin
area I get frame window asking me to provide google account to log in.
I was doing some load tests on app engine today when I noticed a new
Info message in the logs: After handling this request, the process
that handled this request reached the maximum number of requests that
may be handled in a single process' lifetime, and exited normally.
So what that supposed to
I think community here has by a vast majority rejected the idea of
code downloading at least as default (opt out) option.
I also do not like the idea of a payable service, since it will
complicate the pricing model, will attract criticism against the
platform and help guys who are in the business
May be a caching issue ?
Old version served by an intermediate caching proxy?
On Oct 21, 12:14 pm, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this is still sometimes happening with uploading, but
in the early days of GAE the new static files where always visible
when you upload to
Most probably you have issues with China's Firewall.
On Oct 19, 7:50 pm, antichrist ttlt...@gmail.com wrote:
I launched my website using google app engine, but my user complain
about connectivity.
They said they can access site at some time, but some time can't.
I found thread below, but
More transparency is always welcomed, helps developers and the
platform alike :-)
On Oct 18, 11:30 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
I don't think it scales linearly like that. We're working on improvements to
the request scheduler so that we can make better use of
Nice appl and useful, feel a little younger too -:)
On Oct 17, 3:21 pm, Yotam yotamma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, checkout a new Tetris game with high score table, made in GWT
powerd by appengine.
the tetris itself was taken from the gwt-tetris project on google
code.
I think a new language should be out of the question, well until
current platform is stabilized.
But
then again who am I to tell big G what to do and what not.
;-)
On Oct 11, 10:06 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Believe it or not, we've talked about this. There's
No much help I can give you on this except that this mechanism makes
possible the transfer of application ownership.
On Oct 8, 9:23 pm, Sandeep Koduri sandeep.kod...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello dose any idea about my above query??
waiting for some response
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:36 PM,
+1
On Oct 6, 12:48 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
- The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code
using the appcfg.py download_app command.
I'm not at all happy about this. I know how
Seems the group has been hijacked today ;-(
On Oct 4, 6:54 am, Grant Brown grant-br...@uiowa.edu wrote:
Fuck off, you are in the wrong place.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, kof nklaw hduyew...@gmail.com wrote:
Special Greetings
Wishing you vertical and horizontal love, perfect peace,
For an explanation of the issue and workarounds you can take a look
here : http://gaengine.blogspot.com/search/label/Maps%20Api
and yes G does have a paid version of the api in the enterprise
edition here: http://www.google.com/enterprise/earthmaps/maps.html
;-)
On Sep 21, 1:54 pm, mohit
I am quite confident your problem has nothing to do with app engine.
Your robots.txt looks fine to me.
As you also mention there can be some legitimate reasons that Google
can visit a page excluded by robots.txt
/datasource/ can be an html page or any other resource for that
matter as far a
This issue has been raise here many times before.
It is caused by many third party API's imposing per IP quota
restrictions.
Since all app engine's applications are served from a limited number
of IP addresses you have to share this quota with other applications
using same API.
Although I am using
Not been a Googler neither a lawyer - don't take what I write for
granted.
But this issue has been raised here many times in the past and the
answer from Google is in the line yes you can, provided you are not
doing it just to circumnavigate quota restrictions which is not your
intention as I
I am not sure if this helps, or if indeed is your case :
When your receiving mail handler doesn't exit properly (throws an
exception) the mail server form where this email has come from is
notified that the Email is not delivered, this usually tigers a
retry, resending this Email several times
1) Yes Google calendar does sent event reminders via SMS - and by
the way it is very trustworthy service- all my birthdays reminders
come from google's calendar since more than a year.
2) An other SMS gateway that works with App Engine via a WEB API is
tropo, I have tried it last week with very
Good appl,
Statistics I have suggested some time ago look pretty, although I am
afraid these are skewed coz of small sampling space.
For example it seems more developers coming in from Europe than
Americas which seems interesting.
I would encourage everybody here to sign in to this appl so we can
Sure an aggregator is doable in App Engine.
May be you also take a look here: http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To
Since Niklasro's link above seems broken,
you can get an other transparent App Engine Logo in png format from a
link you can find here :
http://gaengine.blogspot.com/2010/06/transparent-app-engine-logo.html
By the way you can see this lovely plane flying if it happens to
visit above page
Nice, open and very convincing talk from Ikai. !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
As far as I remember :
1) No limit
2) No limit except api and cpu limits applicable.
A limit of 2000 outgoing emails (no billing enabled).
Happy coding :-)
Nick Milon
On Jul 21, 6:23 pm, Vivek Ramachandran
vivek.securitywiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My mail is regarding the option for
This issue comes and goes in this thread all the the time.
I also suggested in the past to delegate the job to the client since I
could't see a scenario where we use server side request and be within
the TOR's.
(see here :
is shared.
So do geocoding client side, and then it uses the users quota :)
From time to time the AppEngine IPs get whitelisted by the Maps Team,
but that breaks sometimes (persumably when AppEngine moves to a new
data-center)
On Jul 1, 1:00 am, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
