So, this behavior is completely reproducible.
1) Shut down all instances.
2) Set min instances to 1 (leave all other sliders at default values).
3) Save settings and wait for instance to spin up.
4) Issue one GET request from browser to a specific API endpoint. This is
an API call so it is not
The above post notwithstanding, the original problem I was having - which
caused me to try to set min instances to 1 to begin with - seems to have
gone away. I know this is probably going to fall into the PEBCAK bucket,
but I really don't think I did anything in particular to cause the
It's hard to imagine this working without some sort of background
thread in the frontend instances. Otherwise how do you get the
frontend to commit its data to whatever datasource you want? You
can't really hold open every connection for 2s... at max concurrency
of 10, you'd need 100 instances.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
It's hard to imagine this working without some sort of background
thread in the frontend instances. Otherwise how do you get the
frontend to commit its data to whatever datasource you want?
I suspect I misunderstand
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Richard Watson richard.wat...@gmail.com wrote:
You could also scale the amount in the list depending on how many
requests per second you're getting. If 1000, batch like mad. If
20, submit every request. The risk with this is that you get 1000's,
then
I don't know. Do you? If not, I think it is at least worth a consideration.
-- alex
On Aug 1, 2012 1:33 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:48 PM, alex a...@cloudware.it wrote:
At this point I think the GAE toolbox is empty.
How about Cloud SQL?
Can
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
Anything that involves batching in a frontend risks orphaning data in
the frontend... there's just no efective way to ensure that batching
happens and that the queue is purged when done.
It's definitely not
The thing is GAE does a wonderful job. It has been fine for a year or
so. Now suddenly, we are getting bitten by 'eventual consistency'. And
not at peak load either! This is hitting us at the lowest load time and at
the same time each day.
So, maybe we were just lucky before
Hi Takashi,
This is exactly my problem. Along with the fact that it seems to be
time-of-day dependent. Luckily/unluckily, this just happens to coincide
with the time when I have the least number of users playing.
-R
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 1:16:54 AM UTC-4, Takashi Matsuo (Google)
Hi Richard,
I actually played your game and probably encountered the exact issue.
BTW, it's a cool addictive game.
I agree that eventually consistent window should ideally be more
steady than now. I have passed your issue to the engineering team.
I'll get back to you when I have some updates.
I forgot to mention about one possible workaround which could mitigate
your pain. In the frontend instances, maybe you can get those small
entities with a newly created keys just after putting them in order to
apply the change locally.
This article describes this behavior well:
Hi all,
I have somewhat wierd memcache stats. As I understood from reading the docs
memcache size grows with the traffic of your app. However in practice I
don't see that, quite the opposite actually. I have 2 apps, one is for
development (almost zero traffic) and the other one is live (5-30
Ok, so I read that web page, and I understand that the put() has completed,
but not the commit().
However, I don't really see the potential solution you are suggesting :(
Can you (or someone else) please explain in a bit more detail ?
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 10:55:35 AM UTC-4, Takashi
We've also the same problem. We even had to implement a versioning
controlling algorithm to prevent ugly dirty reads.
Our appid is 'racetownzc'
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 10:57:50 AM UTC-3, Richard wrote:
Hi Takashi,
This is exactly my problem. Along with the fact that it seems to be
I presume the essential line is this:
In the (now standard) High Replication Datastore, the transaction
typically is completely applied within a few hundred milliseconds
after the commit returns. However, even if it is not completely
applied, subsequent reads, writes, and ancestor queries will
Was I the only person unable to see/join the hang-out Asynchronous
Tasks with App Engine: 'Last to Cross the Finish Line' at
https://developers.google.com/events/ahNzfmdvb2dsZS1kZXZlbG9wZXJzcg4LEgVFdmVudBjW7asDDA
?
It was due to start at 0900 hrs today (US Pacific Time) and to last 1
hour.
Afternote: the URL which I pasted into my post does not work. Please
disregard it.
On Aug 1, 6:13 pm, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote:
Was I the only person unable to see/join the hang-out Asynchronous
Tasks with App Engine: 'Last to Cross the Finish Line' at
Yep... got that. However, a query() will still return stale data between
the put() and the (internal) commit(). Which is where I believe I am
sitting...
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:39:41 PM UTC-4, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
I presume the essential line is this:
In the (now standard) High
Hi, I have just configured a certificate for our own custom domain (VIP)
and it is working fine, but Android browsers are rejecting to connect.
Investigating, it seems that I should include the full chain of
intermediate CAs to the uploaded PEM file, but that's not possible since
AppEngine
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google security system. This is really, REALLY not ok. We are losing
sales and looking like total
I am getting the error bellow which I understand refers to an unsupported
HEAD request. However the only form I have is a google search form. So I do
not understand why I am getting this error. What should I look for?
128.227.150.12 - - [01/Aug/2012:11:17:36 -0700] HEAD / HTTP/1.1 405 124 -
I haven't been following this thread to closely. Can you summarize the problem
as you understand it at this point?
On Aug 1, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Richard steven...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep... got that. However, a query() will still return stale data between the
put() and the (internal) commit().
Ok, based on Takashi's suggestion, I now do the following:
new_user_score = Score()
new_user_score.member = thing
new_user_score.put()
# next part is new based on Takashi's suggestion
k = new_user_score.key()
db.get(k)
WOW... I mean... HOLY CRIPES! Time to process each request went from
Summary so far:
I have a massive multiplayer Android game. It has tight timings.
Sometimes (at the same time of day.. when load is lowest), GAE will do a
put() and 5-10 seconds later when I do a query all to create leaderboards
for that game round, I get stale results. for some of the
If you collect the keys of newly created 'small entities' and send them in
batch to the back end for reaping, you could use a batch get() which would
force all the entities to roll forward, and eliminates the eventual
consistency issue.
Unfortunately, I believe that no matter the solution
Our posts crossed paths in the ether.
I don't think you should do 'get(key)' per request on the front end;
rather, you should collect the keys and send them to the back end for use
in a single batch get() call. It still might not completely suit your
needs, but it would be much closer.
On
The backend has 5 seconds to do reap all the results, create a leaderboard
and make it available to the front ends. This part runs in under 2 seconds
typically atm.
I don't believe there is any way to move the keys to the back end (PULL
queues and urlget has been shown to not work), execute a
I don't know if this will help (depends on some specifics of your data model),
but I've found that using a query to get a list of entities, followed by a get
to actually get the data, is a good workaround for many eventual consistency
issues.
Here's snippet of code that provides the
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Richard steven...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, based on Takashi's suggestion, I now do the following:
new_user_score = Score()
new_user_score.member = thing
new_user_score.put()
# next part is new based on Takashi's suggestion
k = new_user_score.key()
db.get(k)
this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google security system. This is really, REALLY not ok. We are losing
sales and looking like total idiots to our customers:
-
Our systems have detected
There were many people experiencing the same problem before, after you
spoke very highly of CloudFlare I asked them If they experience any
problems with GAE, they said no, but I didn't believe
These are all offtopic, another offtopic question: Why don't you switch to
GAE SSL? Is it the
Hi Takashi Joshua,
How about using my user's id as the key ?
eg:
new_score = Score(key_name='ahFkZXZ-c3Zlbi13b3JkaGVyb3ILCxIEVXNlchjFAww')
I assume this would not count as monotonically increasing ?
@ Joshua:
At the moment, I create all new Score objects for each player of that game
round
/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google security system. This is really, REALLY not ok. We are losing
sales and looking like total idiots to our customers:
-
Our systems have
://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google security system. This is really, REALLY not ok. We are losing
sales and looking like total idiots to our customers:
-
Our systems have detected unusual traffic from
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Kaan Soral kaanso...@gmail.com wrote:
There were many people experiencing the same problem before, after you spoke
very highly of CloudFlare I asked them If they experience any problems with
GAE, they said no, but I didn't believe
I'm pissed because this
I think that approach sounds pretty good.
The trick of pasting the new user's data in client-side is similar to a
technique I have used to ensure newly added records appear in the list.
On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Richard steven...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments/thoughts ?
--
You received this
I can't work out why I am getting these errors. In 13 hours I have 26,205
of them. I have no forms in my code.
I do have urlfetch
If as I have been told the error means that the head method is noot
implemented, how do I set up my app to support the Head methiod? I cannot
find anywhere I
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Richard steven...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Takashi Joshua,
How about using my user's id as the key ?
eg:
new_score = Score(key_name='ahFkZXZ-c3Zlbi13b3JkaGVyb3ILCxIEVXNlchjFAww')
I assume this would not count as monotonically increasing ?
I don't think it's ok.
Looks to me like somebody is doing head requests to your app using curl. curl
is a command line program that downloads web pages, similar to wget. This
particular user is coming from linux, possibly from here: Portugal, Braga,
Universidade do Minho (although reverse IP search results aren't
Hi Takashi,
Yeah, the first few characters would probably be very similar. I am not
sure if that would be a problem ?
A single user has only one score in the leaderboard for the game. So,
overwriting the score the next time is not a problem, provided we know when
to NOT include a user in the
As others have said, why not Cloud SQL?
Mysql can handle tens of thousands of inserts per second into an
average-width table:
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2012/05/16/benchmarking-single-row-insert-performance-on-amazon-ec2/
I don't know what kind of performance you can expect from
Thanks for that, but these requests are coming from many different ip
addresses and I can see no pattern to them.
I am just wondering why there are so many and if it is affecting my quota.
Also I do not have a main.py. I have an index.py. I'm wondering now how it
works at all!
On Wednesday,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
I'm pissed because this behavior is undocumented. Google doesn't say
don't access your site through a shared reverse proxy because we may
shut you down with some sort of automated threat detection. This
isn't just a
See example below.
I am getting thousands of these per day and want to stop them. They are
throwing HEAD / HTTP/1/1 errors.
They come from different IP addresses. I'm stumped!
2012-08-01 14:25:52.668 / 405 51ms 0kb curl/7.18.2
(i386-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.18.2 NSS/3.12.2.0
I am getting tens of thousands of curl requests - many thousands time
browser requests and I want to block them. I'm using python. They coming
from many different IPs most in Europe. If I can't stop them I will have
to close my site or go to a new provider.
Thank in advance,
Kate
--
190.93.240.0/20
IPv6
2400:cb00::/32
2606:4700::/32
2803:f800::/32
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 11:13:42 AM UTC-7, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering
Getting the same really annoying error for a very very low traffic web site
5 requests per minute : http://www.filhot.com
How can this be? I'm using CloudFlare too.
Google, please respond.
Francois
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 10:08:42 PM UTC+2, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012
I think you can blacklist those IPs. Have a look in
https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/dos#About_dos_xmlor
https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/dos.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Kate mss.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
I am getting tens of thousands of
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
wrote:
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google
I've posted about this problem before but I don't think I have explained it
adequately.
I am getting tens of thousands of CURL requests throwing HEAD method
errors. This is thousands of times more than normal browser requests.
I can't block them as they come from different IPs and you are only
Yes I can but there's a limit to the number - 100 I think, and there are
tens of thousands of them. I guess I'll just have to move from GAE as there
doesn't seem any way of doing this and I can't be paying for these requests.
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:51:04 PM UTC-4, rerngvit yanggratoke
This definitely sounds like a good strategy... especially with memory
tables and no indexes.
Back when cloud sql was in beta, there was a restriction of 5 queries
per second, so I wrote it off for doing any kind of heavy lifting.
Presumably that restriction has been lifted.
Jeff
On Wed, Aug 1,
Would this really help? There's still going to be a splitting issue
with the index tablet, and that one you will have a hard time
distributing the keyspace for.
Jeff
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Richard steven...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Takashi,
Yeah, the first few characters would probably
we can completely
turn this off.
What was the main reason that you're using CloudFlare?
-- Takashi
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
wrote:
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801
And again I have to pay for GAE issues:
On Jul 30 the Frontend Instance Hours goes beyond the free limit.
First time this week in my application history. Remember: The application was
unusable on this day because GAE starts instances like crazy (on low traffic).
Frontent Instance Hours were
It really sounds like your site is under attack (specifically, a DDOS attack).
Switching hosting providers won't help (they'll just attack the new site).
Blocking based on the UA string (to reject curl requests only) is not a
standard feature of any hosting service. And besides, spoofing the UA
Hi Kate,
Maybe you could look into cloudflare.com it offers protection agains
DDOShttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack attacks,
which is what these request appear to be.
- Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
I'm interested in running my frontend servers in ComputeEngine cloud but
have my apps use DataStore.
The reason why I want to do this so I can have long running websocket
sessions open. And being able to use NodeJS runtime.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi!
I'm having this error below on my first access to my GAE application after
I migrated my application from *Master/Slave Datastore* to *High
Replication Datastore*. Can you help me with this?
1. 2012-07-30 06:49:36.444
Nested in org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException:
i have pop3 account in office, which can be accessed outside office by VPN
dialup.
i want to use Gmail as my email client.
is it possible to setup a 'GAE VPN mail server' so that Gmail can access
and retrieve my work mail?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Yes It was not worked well.But you can use another method to make it work
well see my appspot at
*http://studywebapp.appspot.com/*http://studywebapp.appspot.com/ you
will get the answer.
在 2012年6月16日星期六UTC+8上午11时47分22秒，bhcuong2008写道：
Hi,
here is my simple app, but does not work
test.py:
switch to golang?
On Monday, July 9, 2012 11:00:19 PM UTC-7, Anders wrote:
You really need to fix the slow cold starts of GAE apps. It can take 10
seconds to load a webpage that usually loads in a fraction of a second. See
issue:
My application — ID: lbi-pulse — is currently stuck in Activating Billing
status, and has been for 24 hours. Is there any way of getting support or
resolving this issue?
thanks,
paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view
Dear all:
in my localhost, it can display favicon.ico in the browser, when i upload
gae server, it can't show.
directory tree:
app.yaml
static
webapp
follow is my fiile content,
yaml:
- url: /favicon\.ico
static_files: static/images/favicon.ico
upload: static/images/favicon.ico
file.go:
hii,
i want to ask that how to calculate nonce?actually i am writing code for
counter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi all,
I'm in the process of updating one of my GAE app data sets to include a
dictionary-esque object within the data store. To achieve this, I have
written some helper functions that convert key/value pairs to single
entities within a list that are split by a keyword.
This seems to work
Hi,
Although I am registered getting the same error
I how do i get the whitelisted appspot app for my account?
Thanks
Hrushi
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:19:18 AM UTC+5:30, Dan HoHilevoet wrote:
Hi,
Google Cloud Endpoints is currently a trusted tester feature. In order to
be able to
For the benefit of the archive, the solution is the PolyModel class. This
was fixed in 2009.
https://developers.google.com/appengine/articles/polymodel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web
Suppose, In my website, I ask users to input some string. A user can input
string multiple times. Whenever any user inputs a string, I log it in the
database along with the time. Many strings can be same, even though
inputted by different users. In the home page, I need to give the interface
I have an Entity type say URLInfo which keeps info about URLs. The primary
key of this entity is URL itself ( that makes sure that I always have
unique URLs in the datastore). I also want unique integer id for each url
so that sharing the id becomes easier. Though, I can use GUIDs, but that
I have this google apps email and I am bcc'ing some people and I send it
out, I get no bounce-back messege and no error. And it goes into my sent
email.
But it never reaches the other side? Why?
I have another 2 other google apps domain, and those work perfectly. the
only difference between
I'd just like to jump in and mention that this is happening to my app as
well (www.schoolseatingcharts.com). I am in the same boat as Jeff: I use
CloudFlare in front of my appengine service.
My main reason is the same as Jeff's: CloudFlare offers VIP SSL at 1/5 the
price of appengine. I
I had the same issue found out it was caused by an incorrect field
default type (string instead of a NumberField).
On Sunday, June 24, 2012 4:13:26 PM UTC+1, John Wheeler wrote:
Steve,
I'm running across this error now with the same code pretty much, except
I'm trying to sort by a
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
wrote:
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google
, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Something is triggering a false positive from a totally undocumented
Google security system. This is really, REALLY not ok. We are losing
sales and looking like total idiots
this off.
What was the main reason that you're using CloudFlare?
-- Takashi
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
wrote:
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801-cd1h98pqwb8e8qryct9yjcqwgk.jpg
Does anyone know what is counted in the size limit for deploying? It would
seem my war and src directories are counted. Are jars counted too? Are they
compressed? I'm trying to trim the size of my project, but I'm not entirely
sure why it's too big.
I assume there is no way to expand this limit?
completely
turn this off.
What was the main reason that you're using CloudFlare?
-- Takashi
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
wrote:
Ok, this is fucked up. Visit http://www.voo.st/, and get this:
https://img.skitch.com/20120801
You can check the user agent of the request. Is the Use agent the same?
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kate
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 2:15 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] How can I
CloudFlare biting you in the ass.
It happens. Bonus...
Cloudflare doesn't form its proxy request headers correctly. Check the
archive this isn't undocumented I've mentioned a lot when helping other
people with the same error.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Drake drak...@digerat.com wrote:
CloudFlare biting you in the ass.
What stops me from crafting requests that Google will recognize as an
attack and running them through your CDN in the middle of the Survivor
season finale, shutting you down?
I mean, other than
Thanks Joshue,
How do I file a production issue?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/xPmxxyiQfPsJ.
To post to this group, send email to
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Kyle Finley kylefin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kate,
Maybe you could look into cloudflare.com it offers protection agains DDOS
attacks, which is what these request appear to be.
Oh, the irony...
Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Who had 3:47pm PDT in the pool for when Brandon would pipe up with his I told
you so? Anyone?
:)
On Aug 1, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Drake drak...@digerat.com wrote:
CloudFlare biting you in the ass.
It happens. Bonus...
Cloudflare doesn't form its proxy request headers correctly. Check the
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
New Issue
Production Issue template
Follow the instructions in the template
On Aug 1, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Kate mss.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Joshue,
How do I file a production issue?
--
You received this message because you are
Whatever, Drake (Brandon).
Hi Jeff,
We're in contact with our Google contact to find out what the issue
is. I'll post as I have any additional details to share.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Drake drak...@digerat.com wrote:
CloudFlare biting you in the ass.
It happens. Bonus...
Not if they form their request headers properly.
CF sends IPs that are malformed, nonsensical, and non-responsive. (and often
blank)
My CDN solution says Request on behalf of X the right way.
Oh, and CF has already tried doing that to me. More than once.
--
You received this message because
Hi,
We have heard back from our contact at Google and this is being worked
on (don't have an eta for a full fix yet will let you know...but
hoping within the next day or less).
It also looks like our IPs are going to get whitelisted to prevent
these issues in the future.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012
Yes, I should mention that today might not be a good day to test CloudFlare,
though.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-appengine/Q6yQ4d9ov-o
On Aug 1, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Kyle Finley kylefin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
That's what y'all say every 9 months...
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-appengine/om1DF_61
Xl4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
What evidence do you have to suspect that Google is treating CF as an
attack because of the way they form headers?
That doesn't even make sense - if CF is mangling headers, presumably
they've been doing it for a while, and it wasn't being blocked before.
More likely there's some sort of real
Hi Drake,
We have already had the confirmation from the Google Security Engineer
that is our contact that he will look into this. It is probably best
not to comment on discussions that you are not involved in can't
read minds.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Drake drak...@digerat.com wrote:
Even if she did the check in a middleware, she would still have to
handle/reject the requests by spinning up instances, though. Right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Instead of whitelisting your IPs Fix your Proxy. Google is not the only
place with these issues. Don't lie about the IP the request is on behalf of,
don't create IPs that don't exist or are in unassigned ranges. Don't try to
piggy back session headers that aren't from the same session. Google
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Drake drak...@digerat.com wrote:
That's what y'all say every 9 months...
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-appengine/om1DF_61
Xl4
Brandon, this is why I can't trust anything you say anymore. That
thread is unrelated to this issue, and
Yes you'd still have to check user agent, but that could be very early in
the processing, and returning a denied message will typically cause the
offender to go away.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kyle Finley
Sent: Wednesday,
I think the 5 QPS restriction is still there... but it's only for
connections from outside GAE, AFAIK to discourage using CloudSQL from an
outside app. For GAE there are only limits on concurrent connections
(1000) and requests (100), and request/response size (16MB)
you are being deliberately disingenuous.
I vote for this, personally.
Hi Drake.
I'm pretty sure our engineering team, given their background at major
internet companies and the like, are probably pretty familiar with
creating properly formed headers.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jeff
In the interim, it would be a good idea to put up a static page
stating that your website is under emergency maintenance or similar,
just so your customers have some information.
On Aug 1, 6:01 pm, Joshua Smith joshuaesm...@charter.net wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
Did something recently change here? I've been trimming the fat from my app
for half the afternoon and I'm still not there. This wasn't an issue for
my team as of yesterday. Any ideas what could be happening? Any ideas on
debugging it? Are other seeing this?
Thanks,
Phil
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
