OK Max,
now seems clear
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Isn't this an important subject to address?
Are all method calling the makePersistent method needed to be
synchronized...??
Is this a bug..??
No one has any consideration???
Thanks
On Sep 10, 10:35 am, patrizio.munzi eris4.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
I did a few more investigation and It looks
It was just to confirm and to know if it was possible to disable. For
me it is OK.
On 10 sep, 14:55, Peter Ondruska peter.ondru...@gmail.com wrote:
GAE is using gzip encoding. Why would you want to disable?
On Sep 10, 10:47 am, fvisticot fvisti...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone confirm
Hi Vik,
You can try using a source control control. Some source control tools
allow you to deploy a specific file instead of the whole solution. In
your case, if you only want to deploy 3 modified files, you can just
select these 3 files and deploy it.
Catherine Sea
http://www.dynamsoft.com/
It would be bug or limitation of development environment.
I have not met them on real appengine environment because
container looks like running on single thread model.
Normally it would not need to be synchronized I think.
On Sep 11, 4:41 pm, patrizio.munzi eris4.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't
Similar exception when I deploy to app engine
On Sep 11, 4:13 pm, Max max.seven@gmail.com wrote:
I came from vacation and my project stopped to work.
I have upgraded GAE to 1.2.5 and no difference same results.
Other projects work.
/home/max/workspace/WebProject01/war is regular folder
I have removed index.html and if I go to appid.appspot.com:80 directly
in the browser, i can see the header information printed out.
I think use can't set proxy with a request uri as /proxy.
Richard
On Sep 11, 5:38 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
What do you see when you go to
Hi Alejandro,
What entry do you have in your appengine-web.xml file ?
look at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/runtime.html#logging
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for
When you upgrade the SDK, make sure that the SDK under Google/App
Engine in Preferences is also changed. If possible, remove the old
SDK in Preferences. And check to make sure that you have the latest
jar (1.2.5) in the lib folder. When you upgrade, it should already
replace the old SDK
I tried doing a bulk load with the JDO makePersistentAll(..) call
yesterday ...
by default what I did was created a List of size 2048, filled it to
capacity and then called makePersistentAll() ... I got an
IllegalArgumentException out of that call stating that you could
only persist at most 500
Hi Rick,
The problem is with my testcase, the logging is working fine running
the jetty server.
I don't want to have all the JDO INFO logs for my test.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:03 PM, rick rick4567892...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
What entry do you have in your appengine-web.xml
Thank you Max, I understand a bit more the numeric ID generator in
datastore.
Now I am aware that the numeric ID allocation for the entities
belonging a kind isn't sorted or contiguous like I hope at first.
On Sep 10, 8:10 pm, Max Ross maxr+appeng...@google.com wrote:
The URL I posted earlier
Yes, please provide more information if you can. There was a bug fix in
1.2.5 that made queries respect fetch groups, but JPA doesn't have fetch
groups so the error you're reporting suggests that something is wrong here.
Can you boil it down to a small snippet that reproduces the problem?
Your use of key filters and sorts sounds appropriate.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Corneliu Paul Lupulet
corneliu.lupu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for you answers. I would like to make a clarification, why i am
using the key property in a query.
Using an order by key, I am
You can't filter by the name component of the key because the datastore
doesn't support this. You can only filter by the entire key. Why can't you
create the key by hand? KeyFactory.Builder should have everything you need
to do this.
2009/9/6 Kriván Bálint bal...@krivan.hu
Hi!
I've the
I have created a new project and copied classes and some other files
and it works now.
It is very odd that old project stopped to work without any reason.
On Sep 11, 4:56 pm, Max max.seven@gmail.com wrote:
Similar exception when I deploy to app engine
On Sep 11, 4:13 pm, Max
Hello guys,
It seems that JSP Api+JSTL does not work out of the box at appengine
as it says here
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/web/will-it-play-in-app-engine
Is there any way to update the above link?
Some posts on the list mention that EL was ignored by default (due to
I do not know if this is a bug or if it is already documented somewhere
(I could not find this info when I searched):
I just ran into a problem where session data worked fine in my local dev
environment, but failed when I deployed to the App Engine.
In the AppEngine logs I found a Runtime
Hi Erum. Are you seeing this error in the development environment or in
production?
- Jason
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Erem ehb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
What is the best way to tie into session destruction events?
I have implemented an HttpSessionListener and put it in my
Hi James. If you right-click on your project and click Properties, do you
see a valid SDK selected under Google - App Engine? If so, can you list the
JAR files under your war/WEB-INF/lib directory and provide any other
relevant output? Is Eclipse having trouble resolving your imports (i.e.
they're
All of our documentation is located at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/. You can find a getting started guide
for Java at http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/ and
more detailed information for each App Engine service in the links on the
left.
- Jason
On Wed, Sep 9,
You shouldn't need the @Persistent(valueStrategy =
IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY) line since you're using a key name and not a
String-encoded ID.
The only thing that looks suspicious is your pmf object. The best practice
is to use a PersistenceManagerFactory singleton as documented at
All App Engine documentation is at http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/,
including a Getting Started Guide for Java at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/.
- Jason
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:51 AM, anu nimmala
anunimmala.nimm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi sreeekanth,
So nice
If you're subclassing SimpleFormController, you can also override the
initBinder method in your custom classes directly. e.g.:
@Override
protected void initBinder(HttpServletRequest request,
ServletRequestDataBinder binder) throws Exception {
binder.registerCustomEditor(String.class, new
Trying to give you more info on this.
- the error appears sometimes, it causes groovytweets.org fail every
other request or so
- retweets is a Collection of Entity Retweet, part of the Tweet Entity
- worked fine before 1.2.5
- I never detached anything... if I need to, can someone provide an
I am not sure what you mean. I never detach anything explicitly, so I
have no idea how to detach anything else.
javax.jdo.JDODetachedFieldAccessException: You have just attempted to
access field retweets yet this field was not detached when you
detached the object. Either dont access this field,
I am not sure what you mean. I never detach anything explicitly, so I
have no idea how to detach anything else.
Yes you do ... in JPA at commit or at close of the EntityManager the
contract is to detach all current entities, as per the JPA spec. As
you identified later in your post.
I talked to another developer about this, and this is what he mentioned:
He may need to be setting the system property that points to the location of
the logging.properties file in his test runner. The web server gets this
property set in appengine-web.xml, but if he's outside of the server, he
Related: why are child objects not automatically detached if the
parent is detached? Would that not not logical?
Cheers
Sven
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Sven Haiges
sven.hai...@googlemail.com wrote:
Andy, first of all thx for the response. Things begin to make a little
more sense.
But
Rajeev:
adding the below argument to my ant junit task solves the problem.
jvmarg
value=-Djava.util.logging.config.file=war\WEB-INF\logging.properties/
Thanks!
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
I talked to another developer about this, and this is what he
Related: why are child objects not automatically detached if the
parent is detached? Would that not not logical?
JPA doesn't have fetch groups as such, just a default fetch group.
This is defined by which fields are EAGER loaded. So if you had your
field marked as EAGER then it would be
I've been seeing the same thing, and also only on the first access
after application start. It happens consistently for me with my first
call to either getObjectById makePersistent or makePersistentAll. In
my attempts to search the web for info, I ran across a snippet of code
that included the
Hi Ken. This is a known issue -- one-to-many owned relationships of the same
kind aren't persisted correctly. We do plan to address this particular issue
in a forthcoming update. In the meantime though, you can look into using
unowned relationships (list of keys) instead which should work.
-
That could be. Thanks.
On Sep 11, 8:30 am, fat bold cyclop fat.bold.cyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Do anybody know why is Stored Data Usage increasing even though no
data was added?
When there is no data persisted by my appilcation, the only thing that
makes my datastore grow is _ah_SESSION
Awesome! I am glad it works for you.
On Sep 11, 8:22 am, fat bold cyclop fat.bold.cyc...@gmail.com wrote:
When you upgrade the SDK, make sure that the SDK under Google/App
Engine in Preferences is also changed. If possible, remove the old
SDK in Preferences. And check to make sure that
Just to clarify, you are sending these from a deployed application, correct?
- Jason
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:06 PM, king kingalpha...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem. I sent out 3 email and have been waiting for
hours, still no email arrived at my inbox, there is no error message
What do your JDO objects look like?
- Jason
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Toby tobias.ro...@sunnymail.mobi wrote:
Hello Jason,
I have a similar problem and I use the way you suggest by invoking the
detachCopyAll method.
It works fine, my objects are detached.
I have problem with
Thanx, I will try this out tonight as soon as I get access to the code
again. It seems making the fetchType EAGER is best, as I will access
the filed in all cases, so there is no processing wasted I guess.
Out of my head, this would be the solution I guess (changing to
FetchType.EAGER, LAZY was
Hi, I am using spring in my application and the pmf is a singleton, I
put it in the class just to make sure it is not a spring issue. I am
still getting the error but in my case nothing is persisted. I also
added the @Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
line and no dice my
Which URL are you using? The above code is working for me. You can go ahead
and disregard the getResponseBody warning -- it shouldn't affect the
response from being returned to your app.
- Jason
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Raghu visuma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ALL,
I'm just trying to
On Sep 4, 8:36 am, Nikolay Gorylenko n0...@jug.ua wrote:
please include 1.2.5 jars
tohttp://www.mvnsearch.org/maven2/com/google/appengine/
+1
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:48 AM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote:
Toby Reyelts wrote:
[...]
5000 ms is excessive for container startup. You say this happens before
your code starts to run, but the warnings you're seeing from
FinalizableReferenceQueue come from a dependency on our
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the response. I'm seeing it in the development environment.
I can't even get ahold of a stack trace in production because the
logged events I try to throw just aren't reaching the Logs manager. I
do know that it's not working, however, because the object doesn't get
inserted
The same code in a request works fine btw.
On Sep 11, 3:54 pm, Erem ehb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the response. I'm seeing it in the development environment.
I can't even get ahold of a stack trace in production because the
logged events I try to throw just aren't reaching
and now the error seems to be gone and everything is suddenly back to
normal.
On Sep 11, 3:56 pm, yohann.richard frenchy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Our application was running fine since yesterday's push until about an
hour ago when we suddenly get the error below when users are logued
So now, I am hitting Datastore timeouts and Request timeouts ...
I really really think you guys need to add a mechanism that allows
developers to simply do bulk uploads of data into their GAE
applications (from Java thank you).
:)
On Sep 11, 9:06 am, Larry Cable larry.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Hi Erum. App Engine doesn't support this callback, so when sessionDestroyed
is triggered by the development server, it's not within an active request
and hence the exception that you're seeing. In the production environment,
you would see a similar result if the callback is even triggered at all.
My App Engine is pointed at SDK version 1.2.5. It looks like the auto-
build runs cleanly and the imports all resolve (no red lines). When I
run, the app engine server chokes when trying to render the GWT
controls (textbox and buttons from the out-of-the-box new project
pages.
The error
You guys gotta make this dummy proof. :) Next time I'll try keeping
the stuff I want turned into javascript in the client project and
everything else in the server or a separate package. ;)
On Sep 11, 9:30 pm, Jimmy V jvand...@gmail.com wrote:
My App Engine is pointed at SDK version 1.2.5. It
yep, thanks. It really works, but i don't know why to do this. Can you
explain it or post some links for me to learn a little deep.
cheers,
On Sep 12, 3:13 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
If you're subclassing SimpleFormController, you can also override the
initBinder method in
50 matches
Mail list logo
