Hi Jason,
thanks for your reply. I found the problem was not in the connection
but in my sluggish hardware. The packages were downloaded but somehow,
install process did not finish in time, so it has timed out. NOD
antivirus (ekern.exe) ate 100% of my CPU during installation. Turning
it off
Hi,
Though it doesn't confirm so much.
I put the file in /WEB-INF directly.
I think if you can access this form.
WEB-INF/myfile.dat
Please Try
Thanks.
On 1月5日, 午後4:57, Steph steph@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a RandomAccessFile, which is whitelisted on Google App
Engine.
My simple code
Can I get the user account by default if the user is al ready loggin
in igoogle, gmail, etc?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Since Google App Engine will power down the app if there aren't any
requests for ~10 minutes, it has to re-initialize your application
often. Not a problem I was able to trim my app init down to
about 1.5 seconds, so its reasonable, but datanucleus itself takes
about 5 seconds on top of that
I have just found good discussion on HTTPS Support for appspot.com
on
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/1aa08effbb5839ab/6c6552cf7bdaedaa?lnk=gstq=https#
On Jan 4, 9:43 am, Pion onlee2...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found this SSL/HTTPSSupporton Google Apps
I found the following HIPAA related discussions:
HIPAA requirements vs. AppEngine security guidelines
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/78b40375b8b5af41/4cb5de1b17aae039?lnk=gstq=HIPAA#
IPAA and client data stored w/ Google's App Engine framework
No, we cannot share a user's email address with an application until the
user has explicitly logged into your application.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Acerezo acerezoguil...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I get the user account by default if the user is al ready loggin
in igoogle, gmail, etc?
--
Have you tried enabling offline precompilation?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Todd Lindner todd.lind...@gmail.com wrote:
Since Google App Engine will power down the app if there aren't any
requests for ~10 minutes, it has to re-initialize your application
often. Not a problem I was
It seems there is 1MB limit
On Jan 4, 1:35 am, Max max.seven@gmail.com wrote:
I am still getting that error
com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$RequestTooLargeException: The
request to API call datastore_v3.Put() was too large.
at
Also, can you duplicate the slowness in the dev_appserver? If so, you can
hook up a profiling tool yourself and see if there are any obvious hotspots.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Don Schwarz schwa...@google.com wrote:
Have you tried enabling offline precompilation?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010
Hi,
I have the following query with inequality operators on a single
property:
query = pm.newQuery(File.class);
query.setFilter(dueDate = beginDateParam dueDate =
endDateParam);
ListFile storedFiles = (ListFile)query.executeWithArray(begin,
end);
Runtime is throwing this exception:
Implicit parameters need to be prefixed with a ':'
query.setFilter(dueDate = :beginDateParam dueDate = :endDateParam);
Max
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:53 AM, dantuluri pdantul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the following query with inequality operators on a single
property:
query =
Did you try calling XMPPService.getPresence(JID, JID) with your bot's JID as
the second argument?
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Sahil Mahajan sahilm2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am facing same problem.
Did you find any solution to this problem?
getPresence is always returning false.
On
I did the below testing
Map map = new HashMap();
map.put(username, abc);
List result = service.search(select c from
com.company.testing.model.Usertest c where c.username = :username,
map) ;
System.out.println(+result.size()); //return 0 ; cannot
search by field?
Map map = new
my i know is it correct, for each @transaction, i should only do one
query (persist or load) ? if yes, then i will have to annotation
@tranaction at the dao layer rather than method in service layer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
I tried...but i faced the same issue for 2 days...but now my older
code is giving correct status...nothing changed in my code but it is
working fine now:)
On Jan 6, 5:21 am, Don Schwarz schwa...@google.com wrote:
Did you try calling XMPPService.getPresence(JID, JID) with your bot's JID as
hi there
i am attempting a very simple task of running a junit + spring
+...@persistencecontext but getting the following error
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Application code attempted
to create a EntityManagerFactory named transactions-optional, but one
with this name already
I have changed to
query.setFilter(tags.contains(' + aTagValue + '));
and it still works!
It took me a while to get into this concept, that although it's a
filter clause it's written in java object style and not SQL style, I
mean:
NOT tags contains tagParam BUT tags.contains(tagParam) as you
18 matches
Mail list logo
