Alright I have followed to allow the blacklisted classes to be
exempted from the validation in eclipse and it did not show any error
in my eclipse IDE anymore, so the class is compiled. But when I tried
to run the application(still using the app engine web server) it would
still throw the security
Hi,
I faced the same problem while porting FOP to appengine. The only
difference is that I did want to write to the filesystem or such. In my
case I only had to provide FOP an implementation of some awt graphic
classes.
What I did was to change in fop sources every reference to java.awt in
Hello
This is my class file :
package com.ei.server.web.fe;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.Map;
import org.springframework.web.multipart.MultipartFile;
import com.ei.server.model.auth.IUser;
import com.ei.server.model.auth.impl.User;
public class ReviewFrmCmd {
private
Hi,
Can you try clearing your browser's cookies and seeing if this fixes the
problem?
Rajeev
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Ice13ill andrei.fifi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, i'm using gwt + gae in Eclipse Galileo and i'm trying to run
the project created with the Web Application wizzard.
Hi,
What is the name of your project, and the name of your App Engine SDK? I'm
trying to decipher (in our code) where the message Updating
myproject/...ne - 1.3.0 comes from.
When Eclipse starts up, the SDKs will automatically copy over the necessary
jars to your project's war/WEB-INF/lib
Looking at the code, it seems that problem may be cookie related. Can you
try clearing your browser's cookies and see if that helps the situation?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:45 PM, mar_novice mariocape1...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't run anymore after I updated the sdk and even downloading a
fresh
Okay did not realize that you actually needed to use the class when actually
deploying to GAE. Not sure of the best way to accomplish what you are
after.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:43 AM, ivanceras ivance...@gmail.com wrote:
Alright I have followed to allow the blacklisted classes to be
I'm getting this log message a lot in my application:
Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your
request. Most likely, this indicates that you have reached your simultaneous
dynamic request limit. This is almost always due to excessively high latency
in your app.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Millisecond millisec...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting this log message a lot in my application:
Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your
request. Most likely, this indicates that you have reached your simultaneous
dynamic request
I have seen this error even for hello world. It MAY be caused by too
many simultaneous requests, but it also may be caused by a problem
with appengine itself.
On Jan 22, 12:30 pm, Don Schwarz schwa...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Millisecond millisec...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, you're right, only this bit stuck in my head quotas with billing
enabled can accommodate around 500 requests per second from
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html
Thanks for the pointer to the math working that number back from the
30 request / s limit. Seems a little optimistic
I have successfully deployed a CXF-RS app on GAE by making some
changes in CXF source. Details can be found here
http://sinister2010.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/cxf-rs-on-google-app-engine-exposed3/
It maybe of some help.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Suppose I have a class A and I have stored some instance of it in the
datastore. Then I change it, but I keep the name. How I can delete all
the previous data in the datastore, if I simply do a query and use
deleteAll, it gives an error (I guess because I changed the name of
some fields). Thank
Hi all,
i'm trying to use google app engine to build my first apps using java.
i'm new to java but i would like to use app engine to train myself for
web app developing.
i've got some issues using the users services.
these are my servlets:
/*
* TestingUsers.java
*/
package mytrainingapp;
This is of some help to those who are trying for CXF-RS apps on GAE
http://sinister2010.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/cxf-rs-on-google-app-engine-exposed3/
On Jan 14, 12:43 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi Ralf. We may be able to add support for this annotation in a forthcoming
Here is the code I use to delete one kind at a time - it batches the
keys into Lists of 100 to avoid datastore exceptions. Iterables is
from Google collections.
Query query = new Query(kind);
Hi Jeff S
I've added more working examples in GAE of ItsNat framework and fixed
problems.
The phrase
It works including AJAX:
http://itsnatfeatshow.appspot.com/servlet?itsnat_doc_name=manual.core.example;
Can now be shorter:
It works including AJAX: http://itsnatfeatshow.appspot.com;
Thanks
It would be good to have the ability to do this from within the GUI.
Other database management tools have empty table options, so a
delete all of this Kind feature would be appropriate.
On Jan 22, 12:59 pm, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the code I use to delete one kind at
Strange that it would work locally. MultipartFile doesn't sound like
something that is serializable. You'll want to store your data using the
Blob class we provide, anyway.
Are you storing this in the datastore or a session? You'll want to minimize
the amount of data you store in a session.
On
bump; anyone?
On 14 jan, 21:23, Marcel Overdijk marceloverd...@gmail.com wrote:
target name=update description=Uploads the application to App
Engine.
appcfg action=update war=war
options
arg value=--enable_jar_splitting /
/options
Yes it would be very nice to have GUI support for this. I will try the
code John thank you.
Mete
On Jan 22, 8:47 pm, Locke locke2...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be good to have the ability to do this from within the GUI.
Other database management tools have empty table options, so a
delete all
Can you post the code for your query? Child objects are lazily loaded, so if
you close the Persistence Manager before retrieving them it will return an
empty List.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Dave ladjo...@gmail.com wrote:
I had gotten my application to save data, but my queries are
Yes, that's possible. The Users Service is convenience, especially for those
people using Google App Engine with a Google Apps Domain. You'll need to
create your own User model and maintain the session state yourself, however.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:36 AM, ale aleee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 especially for large tables
On Jan 22, 10:47 am, Locke locke2...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be good to have the ability to do this from within the GUI.
Other database management tools have empty table options, so a
delete all of this Kind feature would be appropriate.
On Jan 22, 12:59 pm,
I am quite new to App Engine development and JPA. I am running App
Engine 1.2.6 and I use Eclipse. Here are three problems I've
encountered that perplex me:
1. Servlet receives multiple instances of posts.
I posted 30 distinct records using AJAX. In the Dev environment, my
servlet receives 30
I wish that were the case ... however GAE VFS does not function when
hosted (but does locally)
the only apparent difference is this exception ...
On Jan 21, 8:18 pm, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
These exceptions are a normal part of startup and logged at the INFO
level for that
Hey everybody,
I just wanted to give an update about this issue. We've changed resource
allocation for our Java developers, which should result in much less app
evictions. Some of you may have already noticed an improvement. I've already
received several encouraging messages from developers who
Ikai,
Great news. I can report that I'm seeing FAR fewer cold starts
today. So thank you!
Would still love to see this implemented:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2456
cheers
-- James
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I have a one to many relationship. There is a problem in the way I
query for a B object. I was wondering what is the best way (most
efficient) to do that.
A a = new A(A);
B b = new B(B);
a.getBs().add(b);
pm.makePersistent(a); // it's done inside a transaction
A ap = pm.getObjectById(A.class, A);
I have found deleting to be the most CPU hungry activity - more than
putting the data in the first place. Using code similar to below I
have used over an hour of CPU time in one 30 second request!
So I wonder if that is why this option doesn't exist in the GUI...
people would be gutted to
Execute a query on the name property of B rather than loading it by
key. If the name is unique the result should only contain one B.
On 23 Jan 2010, at 11:41, Sydney wrote:
I have a one to many relationship. There is a problem in the way I
query for a B object. I was wondering what is the
I would like to use appcfg.py download_data to export my entities in
csv format and maintain the owned relationships between entities
(one-to-many in this case). I am getting the entity key as a field in
the csv, but I've looked around a bit and haven't found how to decode
it.
Can it be decoded
Hi,
I have an Employee class
public class Employee {
@PrimaryKey
@Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
@Extension(vendorName=datanucleus, key=gae.encoded-pk, value=true)
private String id;
@Persistent private String department;
@Persistent private
Hello, Anyone has uploaded a document to google docs (gdata) with a
servlet? anyone has an example of source code ?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
34 matches
Mail list logo
