Hi culov. I believe this was largely addressed on Monday. Please let me know
if you continue to see any other geocoding problems, and, if possible,
include your Maps API key (you can send this to me privately if you prefer).
- Jason
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, culov cul...@gmail.com wrote:
The high-level summary and complete transcript of the May 5th edition
of the IRC office hours is pasted below. Our next normally scheduled
office hour session (May 19th) is CANCELLED because of conflicts with
Google I/O -- if you happen to be coming to I/O, you can meet us in
person and have a
Hi Sergio. I'll try to test this out soon. If you haven't already, you may
want to post this in the Ehcache forums also since they can probably help
you debug the issue faster:
- Jason
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Sergio Lopes slo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody
Ehcach announced recently
The high-level summary and complete transcript of the April 7th
edition of the IRC office hours is pasted below. Join us in two weeks,
Wednesday, May 5th from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PST for the next installment.
Note: On the first and third Wednesdays of every month, the App Engine
team signs into the
The high-level summary and complete transcript of the April 7th
edition of the IRC office hours is pasted below. Please join us on the
first and third Wednesday of every month in the #appengine channel on
irc.freenode.net. On the first Wednesday, we meet in the channel from
7:00-8:00 p.m. PST
Last Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of its
bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a summary
of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will take
place next Wednesday, March 3rd from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PST in the
#appengine channel on
The high-level summary and complete transcript of the February 3rd
edition of the IRC office hours is pasted below. Please join us on the
first and third Wednesday of every month in the #appengine channel on
irc.freenode.net. On the first Wednesday, we meet in the channel from
7:00-8:00 p.m. PST
Two Wednesday back, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of
its bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a
summary of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will
take place this coming Wednesday, February 3rd from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PST
in the #appengine
/java/blobstore/overview.html
- Jason
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:53 AM, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 12:47 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
I implemented the sample Blobstore application provided in the
documentation
(two servlets, Upload.java
...
2010/1/14 Jason (Google) apija...@google.com
Does your application work if you don't detach the entity a second time?
For instance, are you able to update the entity, re-cache it, then retrieve
it and pass it back into makePersistent without any errors? I was under the
impression that passing
No, there is no special initialization needed when running your application
for the first time in production. As Ian mentioned, please check your log
output -- this should indicate what the issue is. If you have any questions
about, feel free to post it here along with a full stack trace.
- Jason
Hi Ralf. We may be able to add support for this annotation in a forthcoming
release. Please star the issue in your post if you want to be notified of
any status changes.
- Jason
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Ralf Sigmund ralf.sigm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i am a newbie to App Engine. So I
This sounds like a transient error. Please let me know if you are still
seeing this error consistently and provide the Google account that you are
using to sign in to appengine.google.com, and I will look into it further.
- Jason
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:17 AM, sathish12345678
Does your application work if you don't detach the entity a second time? For
instance, are you able to update the entity, re-cache it, then retrieve it
and pass it back into makePersistent without any errors? I was under the
impression that passing an entity into makePersistent re-attaches the
That particular term is in place to prevent misuse of our hosting
environment, specifically developers that attempt to deploy the same
application to multiple IDs and use a gateway application to choose
between these applications randomly to distribute the load evenly.
Unfortunately, the term does
It looks like you got this working. The app is serving for me and I see
several successful requests logged. Please let me know if you have any more
questions.
- Jason
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:30 AM, rkvsraman rkvsra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I started with my first Java App thru Eclipse
Datastore entities can be at most 1 MB, although entities can contain
references to other entities allowing you to split large files, store them
in multiple entities, and then resolve these when the application is
requested, keeping in mind that the maximum request size is currently 10 MB.
Several
Hi YONG. I'm seeing this too on my end. I see a more descriptive error
message, however -- the Admin Console is basically reporting that billing
isn't enabled for the application when it really is, and hence doesn't
process the delete request. Please star this external issue and you'll be
notified
for a
complex large application. The job Brett Slatkin sets out to do has not
completed without the Java codes since GAE now supports Java.
Thanks
Duong BaTien
DBGROUPS and BudhNet
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 14:13 -0800, Jason (Google) wrote:
Can you be more specific about what you're trying
What application ID are you using, and what kind of error do you see when
you try to delete the blob? Can you clarify how you were able to delete the
blob from mediastore apps but not the apps console (which I assume
refers to the Admin Console for your app)? If you weren't successful in
deleting
Hi ChrisDane. Certainly, there's nothing stopping you from deploying a
RemoteServiceServlet and HttpServlet to the same application if I'm
understanding you correctly. You can define a wide range of servlets to
handle incoming HTTP requests from your mobile app and wire them to the
appropriate
Hi Prashant. This doesn't appear to have anything to do with memcache. Your
complaint is that @NotPersistent-annotated fields are reassigned to null
when the object is detached. I'm not familiar enough with the JDO
specification to say whether this is expected, but I've filed a bug and Max
will
Can you be more specific about what you're trying to accomplish so we don't
have to search through the video to find what you're looking for? Or, at
least provide a timeline reference that we can refer to in the video. :)
Thanks,
- Jason
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Duong BaTien
1) I wasn't able to reproduce this in either the development or production
environments. I created a very simple PersistenceCapable JDO object,
persisted 10 of them, then queried for these changing the values of setRange
as I did so, using 0, then 2, then up to 9, and every time, the query
If you're using JDO, then just as Juan said, you can fetch the author's
books when you fetch the author entities themselves. Just make sure to
specify that the books field is in the default fetch group:
@Persistent(defaultFetchGroup = true)
private ListBook books;
//...
public ListBook
First, what is your application ID? Second, how do you guarantee that you
only make the call once per hour? Do you have it set up as a cron job or are
you just making the call once a memcache value expires or are you using
another mechanism? What kind of call are you making to the YouTube API and
Hi Everyone. Just a note that Googler replies may be slower over the
next couple of weeks as we take a short pause to welcome the new year.
During this break, we will be piloting a new issue tracker template
for speedier resolution of production issues. In the rare event that
your app experiences
This past Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of
its bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a
summary of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will
take place on Wednesday, January 6th from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PST in the
#appengine channel on
:16 PM, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry. What's your app ID?
Indexes are auto-generated by the SDK when you run a query locally that
requires a custom index. If you don't run a particular query locally and
it
uses multiple sort orders or otherwise requires a custom
Hi Dmitry. What's your app ID?
Indexes are auto-generated by the SDK when you run a query locally that
requires a custom index. If you don't run a particular query locally and it
uses multiple sort orders or otherwise requires a custom index, then the
index won't be generated in
This past Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of
its bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a
summary of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will
take place on Wednesday, November 18th from 9:00-10:00 a.m. PST in the
#appengine channel
As always, I need your application ID in order to help troubleshoot
app-specific issues. Please provide that and any stack traces or other error
messages you see in your application's logs.
- Jason
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Dmitry Anipko dmitry.ani...@gmail.comwrote:
After some more
If you're calling print or println many times in your servlet, then it makes
sense, although the resource savings you net may not be significant.
In general, it's acceptable to use the default PrintWriter.
- Jason
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Raphael André Bauer
files
with Bit Depth 8 and paletted PNG files with Bit Depth 4 and 8.
Currently there is no support for grayscale images. If there is
interest we may add support for more types of PNG files and possibly
GIF support.
On Oct 7, 4:14 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi mably. Can you
Hi Pradheep. The library that you are using is attempting to spawn a new
thread which is not permitted by App Engine's sandbox. You will have to
either disable multithreading via configuration, if the library exposes
this, or use another library.
The Google Accounts API that is referenced in the
It looks like your system may not have Java configured correctly or
otherwise can't invoke the javac compiler needed to compile your
application.
java.io.IOException: Cannot run program javac.exe: CreateProcess error=2
You may want to search the web for similar error messages, which might help
of the query language.
I'm sure my questions reflect a newness to OOD. I do appreciate your
response.
Hans
On Nov 2, 3:27 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi Hans. Aside from the article on modeling entity relationships and the
JDO
...
It sounds like you want to add a new kind
Did your path always include the one \ delimiter with all of the other
separators being /?
- Jason
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Vik vik@gmail.com wrote:
Hie
Today all of a sudden when i tried to deploy my app to GAE throws errors:
An internal error occurred during: Deploying
Hi Julio. How are you verifying that the entity is not persisted? Are you
querying for it or verifying using the data viewer? If you're not using the
data viewer, please try this first --
http://localhost:8080/_ah/admin(substitute your port number for 8080).
If you don't see your entities in the
The overhead of having to fetch the inner object is negligible since
you're using a direct fetch by key. You can set a @NotPersistent property of
the intended type and modify your DAO methods to fetch both objects (User
and FavoriteFood) and set the @NotPersistent property of the User to this
Do you see any other exceptions under WARNING or ERROR that provides more
information? How long do you wait before the exception is thrown? If it's
close to 30 seconds, you could be experiencing a timeout, and you can try
scaling back the number of entities written (500 is the theoretical max but
Hi Esteban. Please file any discrepancies between the development and
production environments as bugs in the public issue tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
Can you attach or link to an image that I can use to reproduce the error?
Thanks,
- Jason
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009
I think you already arrived the recommended solution to the issue of
counting entities. For reference, the reason that the production environment
only returned at most 1,000 is an artifact of the query mechanism that App
Engine uses which can only return up to 1,000 results per query.
- Jason
On
, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
We'll get these reflected in the documentation very soon.
- Jason
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
The limits on tasks queues recently changed
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2009/10/task-queue
I don't see a link, but if your framework is open source, feel free to
submit it to the App Engine open source projects listing by following the
instructions at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/web/google-app-engine-open-source-projects
.
- Jason
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:35 AM,
Hi Sanjith. All App Engine requests must return within 30 seconds or this
exception will be thrown. If you have a larger task, you can divide it into
several parts and execute these in separate tasks, but each task must also
return in 30 seconds or less.
- Jason
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:12 AM,
App Engine's DataNucleus plugin doesn't support the setCandidates method for
querying a select group of entities -- all queries currently target the full
datastore. You're welcome to file a feature request in
the datanucleus-appengine issue tracker, but this isn't likely to be
prioritized in the
Can you try moving your query into the first transaction and report if this
makes a difference?
- Jason
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, RoryD rory1doug...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm aware of the restriction on operating on multiple entity groups in
a single transaction, but I thought the
App Engine uses standard XMPP federation to send messages to other XMPP
servers.
- Jason
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:38 PM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com wrote:
may i know what integration technique that you folks use to implement
external component to an existing XMPP server (e.g.
Can you print the full stack trace? Which class is not found?
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Shreyas Goel fenzo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to prepare an app using Restlets for GAE, however even
after following instructions mentioned at
Hi Stavros. App Engine's production sandbox does not permit applications or
any frameworks/libraries used to spawn new processes or threads:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/runtime.html#The_Sandbox
I'm not familiar with XFireFault so I can't offer any specific tips, but
some libraries
Hi Hans. Aside from the article on modeling entity relationships and the JDO
documentation, there aren't a lot of resources on http://code.google.com on
this subject, which is something we'll try to address going forward. You may
be able to find blog posts from other developers on this, but it's a
You should be able to read it if you put it in your war directory and
configure it as a resource file. I believe the second step is done
automatically -- all files are configured as both resource and static by
default, though you can override it by following the instructions at
Are you still seeing this error? What's your application ID?
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Andreas Blomqvist
blomqvist.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
getting SEVERE: Version still not ready to serve, aborting.
when I try and deploy. Did server rollbacks. What could be wrong?
. The problem is that already the first attempt to
download an image times out under 10 secs, although I did
setConnectTimeout(1).
On Oct 29, 9:51 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Is the server on which your JPEG is hosted especially slow?
The server where the JPEGs are hosted
Hi Jed. There was some deployment latency late last week, but this didn't
last very long, and everything should be up and running smoothly. Please let
me know if you continue to see this error and make sure to provide your
application ID in future posts.
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:04 PM,
You may want to post this in the Wave developers discussion group as well:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:39 AM, VTR vtrraviku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I just downloaded the eclipse IDE and was trying the first Wave Robot.
But seem to be
It looks like returning the list of detachable objects attempts to send a
list of generic Object instances over the wire. The Object class doesn't
implement Serializable so GWT will trigger an exception.
Try doing something like the following and see if the error goes away:
Hi Julio. Can you clarify what you mean by this statement:
If i change the code to the mail handler class, it works.
As Andy says, creating a new PersistenceManager isn't very expensive, so I
wouldn't store an instance in a static variable or worry about sharing an
instance with other classes --
Hi Peter. Do you have any existing entities in the datastore that were
stored before you made this change? If so, the exception is likely being
thrown when one of these entities is retrieved. Since you've changed the
primary key field, you may have to remove the original entity and re-add it.
You
You might also be interested in this project, which handles the splitting
and persistence for you transparently:
http://code.google.com/p/gaevfs/
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM, le anh leanhduc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, everybody .
I'm creating a web site by Google Appengine.
In my
This isn't available for Java just yet, but you can use the Python bulk
loader tool with your Java deployed apps. You may have to deploy remote_api
to a new version of your application using the Python SDK, but all versions
share the same datastore, so you can still download the original data
Yes, that is the correct doc for the Java indexes.
Regarding your GQL query, the name of the kind is not the full name of the
class (including the package) but the simple name. So try using MDsIri
instead of com.col.server. MDsIri. You should be able to see any entities
you saved in the data
Ah, my apologies. I overlooked that he was using public field instead of a
getter.
- Jason
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM, datanucleus andy_jeffer...@yahoo.comwrote:
I'm not sure if method: employeeCheck.computerKeys.isEmpty())
launches lazy loading.
It should, but adding the
, 7:05 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Can you confirm whether you see a similar error when you try to deploy
using
the command line utility?
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/uploadinganapp.html#...
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:01 PM, bizkut mcgroga
Yes.
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:46 AM, leszek leszek.ptokar...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean Google App Engine/J implementation of this ?
http://code.google.com/intl/pl/appengine/docs/python/urlfetch/asynchronousrequests.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
It should, but adding the annotation won't hurt.
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:27 AM, leszek leszek.ptokar...@gmail.com wrote:
You have now:
employee.addComputer(computer);
pm.close();
Replace with:
employee.addComputer(computer);
pm.makePersistent(employee);
Can you post the code that you're using to re-persist the updated HashMap?
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:07 AM, barak barak.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, did that and the map is indeed serialized now. But now, the
enitity is fetched, seems like the state is not always kept.
For
Yes, this looks like a bug. Please file it in the issue tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
In the meantime, you should be able to work around it like this:
try {
} catch (Exception e) {
if
(e.getClass().getName().equals(ResponseTooLargeException.class.getName())) {
Hi David. This may be coming to Java eventually, but it hasn't been started
yet. If you or anyone else is interested in contributing, let me know.
- Jason
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:52 AM, David Chandler turboman...@gmail.comwrote:
Re: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/deferred.html
Are you trying to run Openfire on App Engine?
- Jason
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com wrote:
how to use java GAE with external jabber server like openfire? any
guide?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hi James. I don't have any specific information for you, but if you don't
get any other responses, you may build a small test system to see how it
performs, and I'm interested in hearing your results. In the meantime, all
relevant task queue limits are linked to below:
Is the server on which your JPEG is hosted especially slow? Note that the
default timeout limit for URL Fetch requests is 5 seconds. You can increase
this up to 10 by passing 1 (ms) into setConnectTimeout().
Also keep in mind that your image will have to be smaller than 1 MB if
you're
is 100K tasks/day for free apps and 1M
default for billing enabled.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jason (Google) apija...@google.comwrote:
All task queue quotas and limits are listed at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/taskqueue/overview.html#Quotas_and_Limits.
Note that you can
You can use something like this:
@Persistent(serialized = true)
private Integer[][][] myArray;
You won't be able to query on it, but it does work.
- Jason
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:37 PM, king kingalpha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there, does GAE JDO support something like:
@Persistent
Never mind, looks like you already did. :)
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi James. I don't have any specific information for you, but if you don't
get any other responses, you may build a small test system to see how it
performs, and I'm
, James Cooper jamespcoo...@gmail.comwrote:
Related question:
Is there a limit to the number of pending tasks in a queue? Can you
have a million items in there?
thanks
-- James
On Oct 27, 12:07 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
No, all individual tasks must complete in 30
is greatly welcome.
Is the OR query operator on the roadmap for GAE? If so, what time
frame would that be?
On Oct 27, 2:41 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
While App Engine's datastore does limit which queries you're able to
execute, there are various workarounds, which
Up until recently, using abstract classes and persistent subclasses usually
failed to work, but the latest preview release for the JDO/JPA layer
includes support for inheritance. More information here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/c4208f960d05d11a
-
Hi JT. We have seen that Grails-based applications can take up to 30 seconds
to spin up on App Engine. We have back-end enhancements coming in the next
few releases that should improve this considerably, but Grails itself is
partly responsible for the long initialization time, which our back-end
At the very least, the local and production environments should have
identical behavior, and I agree that App Engine should not be returning GMT
for well-established time zones. Please file a new issue in the tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
- Jason
On Sat, Oct 24,
See the Exception Summary at the bottom of the low-level API reference:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/datastore/package-summary.html
We'll be coming out with an article soon which discusses this in more detail
and includes examples of how to catch
You can use the Task Queue API from any servlet/handler. So define a new
servlet, to be triggered by either an incoming request or a scheduled task,
that then retrieves the default queue and adds new tasks to the queue.
For example, if you have a servlet that gets triggered when a user submits a
At present, no, although this is something that should be possible once the
SDK for Java is open source.
- Jason
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:15 AM, WSouza willmso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to slow down the local datastore? So it matches more
the performance of the appengine?
Hi Alexander. You should be able to catch a
com.google.apphosting.DeadlineExceededException which is thrown when a
request takes too long to process, and you should be able to do the small
amount of processing necessary to display a custom error page.
- Jason
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:14 AM,
You can also use the new datastore statistics API, which is probably faster
although I haven't timed this myself:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/stats.html
- Jason
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Patrizio Munzi patrizio.mu...@eris4.comwrote:
Hi all,
what's the best
Hi Stuart. Follow the instructions at the end of the following page to list
your project on the open source projects wiki page:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/web/google-app-engine-open-source-projects
- Jason
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Stuart Moffatt
While App Engine's datastore does limit which queries you're able to
execute, there are various workarounds, which, while not ideal from a
development point of view, do ensure that query execution time is minimized
so your app can achieve the best possible scalability. One common pattern is
Corrected.
- Jason
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Joonas lehti...@gmail.com wrote:
Vaadin 6.1 currently has full Google App Engine compatibility
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
to www.myid.com? I would more than pleased to be able to
configure a 301redirect from myid.com to www.myid.com but I am not
sure how can I do this with myid.com being mapped to google apps.
Please advise,
Marius
On Oct 14, 10:16 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Please try not to double
Can you post the code you're using to persist the SyncConfiguration and
Account objects?
- Jason
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Gerd Saurer gerd.sau...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a object mapped to the Datastore that looks like:
@PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION)
isUserAdmin returns true only if the current signed-in user is an
administrator of the application, not the domain. If you need to
programmatically determine Google Apps domain administrators, see the Google
Apps APIs:
http://code.google.com/apis/apps/
- Jason
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:52 AM,
Hi Vince. It may very well be intentional, but feel free to open a new bug
report -- it will be closed if it's confirmed to be working as intended.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
- Jason
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vince Bonfanti vbonfa...@gmail.comwrote:
The SDK
I'm not familiar with the quotas for Google's Documents List API or your
planned access rate, so this is something you should confirm in the
Documents List API discussion group, but generally speaking, this does seem
like a reasonable strategy.
We are working on enhancements that will hopefully reduce this
initialization time for cold instances, which should be rolled out with the
next couple of releases. There are several other threads on this, and we
definitely recognize the importance and appreciate your patience.
Regarding the first
For very simple models (i.e. no relationships), you can use Long- and
String-based primary keys to maintain portability, but if you do want to use
relationships, at least one model will have to rely on the
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Key class.
- Jason
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:52 PM,
This past Wednesday, the App Engine team hosted the latest session of
its bimonthly IRC office hours. A transcript of the session and a
summary of the topics covered is provided below. The next session will
take place on Wednesday, November 4th from 7:00-8:00 p.m. PST in the
#appengine channel on
downs yesterday alone!
I am REALLY looking to this update - until then I'd highly recommend
staying away from Spring!
On Oct 21, 6:59 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Aside from keeping steady HTTP traffic to your site, I'm afraid not. But
as
I wrote in my last post, we're
Yes, please try changing the log levels to .INFO or .FINEST -- it's possible
that the log output that the frameworks are generating is just not getting
surfaced because of the default logging level.
After you deploy, you say that all you see is an empty site. Have you tried
refreshing several
Hi Diana. As others have stated, App Engine can write to multiple entity
groups in parallel, so if each User entity is a root entity or is otherwise
placed in a different entity group, then there shouldn't be any issues.
Regarding performance, all apps should generally be able to handle up to 30
1 - 100 of 302 matches
Mail list logo
