Hi There,
Can you tell me a little about how partial indexes are implemented in
objectify? Is it supported in the underlying API or is it solely implemented
in objectify?
Kind regards Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
with my setups? If it's normal, how do you verify that
your code is not doing something that will fail on the actual AppEngine
servers?
Thanks,
Tobias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send
();
} catch (IOException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
Should I open a bug report for this? Is it a Guice or an AppEngine-problem?
I can provide my test-case project if needed.
Regards,
Tobias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hello,
I was wondering if it's somehow possible to make the development server
forbid file writes as the AppEngine servers do and emulate the AppEngine
environment more closely? I'd like to know if one of my libraries uses temp
files before deploying it to AppEngine.
Thanks,
Tobias
--
You
-
order the list. Why is that, and is there a way to work around it?
Thanks,
Tobias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
looks interesting. I think I will give this a try.
Can someone give any advice on doing full-text search over datastore
entities? Compass+lucene is by far the heaviest part of my application.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:36 PM, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.comwrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 17:58,
