Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO preview release : child object is still null !

2009-11-27 Thread Max Ross (Google)
Eventually, yes, but we felt that supporting basic inheritance was the more critical need so that's what got all the attention for 1.2.8. Polymorphic relations typically require either joins, discriminator columns, or both. We'd like to avoid all of that, and I think we can, but we have to wait

Re: [appengine-java] Re: JDO preview release : child object is still null !

2009-11-25 Thread Prashant
Is there any plan to support polymorphism in relationships? I tried it with 1.2.8 pre-release, felt disappointed seeing it is not supported yet. I was expecting it to be supported in 1.2.8 release. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine

[appengine-java] Re: JDO preview release : child object is still null !

2009-10-26 Thread Prashant
Update: i test it on production server, child objects are not even getting saved ! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to

[appengine-java] Re: JDO preview release : child object is still null !

2009-10-26 Thread Max Ross (Google)
I'm expecting to have it in place by the next release, but anything related to relationships has been a beast to implement so it's possible it won't be done in time. I will say that it's unlikely I'll be able to add support for the specific example you've provided, where your parent has a