[appengine-java] Re: raise limits for applications

2011-03-24 Thread Perun Katana
Hello, Nice :) The google storage seems to be the most viable option for my needs to put aside the bigger content files (e.g. the third-party libraries) and reference them from the jnlp file. Unfortunatelly it is available only for U.S developers yet (which I am not). Anyway I've joined the

[appengine-java] Re: raise limits for applications

2011-03-24 Thread Yegor
Hi, Ikai, Interactions between GAE apps and Blobstore are billed for storage + CPU. Google Storage is billed for storage + network + request count. How do the two compare in a real-world scenario from price/performance standpoint? It seems that Blobstore, being a core part of GAE, is regarded as

[appengine-java] Re: raise limits for applications

2011-03-24 Thread Perun Katana
Hello Yegor, for my case the requests for large data are done from the client side, the application only refers them. In that point an external storage, objects with fixed URI are more feasible than passing data from blobstorage consuming CPU cycles, blobstorage api calls. Thank you for clearing