object is null (both
the Eclipse debugger and the application throwing NPE confirm it).
What am I doing wrong?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Yegor
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
.
Guice prints a similar stacktrace for its reference finalizer too,
also as INFO.
Cheers,
Yegor
On Sep 4, 1:41 pm, Vince Bonfanti vbonfa...@gmail.com wrote:
After upgrading to SDK 1.2.5, I've noticed a set of stack traces that
show up in both the development environment and on the production
to fetch it non-lazily by
default.
Yegor
On Sep 4, 1:21 pm, Yegor yegor.jba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing a problem after upgrading to Java SDK 1.2.5. In a
simple CMS application a page is stored as a CMSPage entity, which
points to its text saved as a DetachedText entity using
and the application is now
running as expected.
Thanks,
Yegor
On Sep 6, 11:08 am, Max Ross maxr+appeng...@google.com wrote:
It shouldn't be inconsistent. The field will only be unavailable outside
the transaction if it was not accessed inside the transaction, so that might
explain why it only happens
Datastore/Datanucleus complications. After all, you data object
definitions are probably a tiny fraction of the rest of the
application.
Yegor
On Oct 13, 11:02 pm, chrislewis burningodzi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've spent hours wrestling with getting some form of a working dev
environment
at runtime or complains about the lack of identity field
on the abstract class. Well, duh! to the latter error message I'd
say.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
Yegor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post
. Maybe composition instead of
inheritance can help. I am going to check if I can use embedded
classes to solve this problem.
Yegor
On Dec 13, 1:54 am, datanucleus andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com wrote:
With all persistence standards, the identity field(s)/property(s) have
to be in the base persistent class
Account
where accountId=? as opposed to pm.getObjectById(accountId).
I'm still hopeful about the composition approach. I just started
coding. Let's see how it goes.
Thanks,
Yegor
On Dec 13, 2:51 pm, Rusty Wright rwright.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Another way you could look at is that by using things
and the query that caused it.
Because the dashboard is down too I can't even see the error logs.
The system status doesn't show any problems except for some Python
anomaly. I am on Java.
Yegor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group
was apparently lucky.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Yegor yegor.jba...@gmail.com wrote:
My GAE apps (Java) and the app engine dashboard produce intermittent
Server 500 errors with a generic message:
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request
QUOTE]
Following http://dl.google.com/eclipse/plugin/3.6/content.xml in a web
browser results in a 404 page not found. I guess I'll have to download
the SDK outside of Eclipse.
What's up?
Thanks,
Yegor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
Actually, I have seen this behaviour in several recent releases of the
SDK. At this point, every time I upgrade, I kinda half-expect that my
test data will be gone. It would be nice if local data persisted
between releases.
On Oct 19, 12:20 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
query.declareParameters(Long bind_pocId, Date bind_startDate, Date
bind_endDate);
This is correct. However, I personally prefer the shorter form, where
instead of using filter column == alias along with
query.declareParameters(Type alias) you just use filter column
== :alias (note the colon
I had to strongly synchronize my app using Java options (locka,
synchrnized objects, and so on...).
I have to warn you that all this synchronization will be in vain once
your application grows beyond 1 JVM. Java keyword synchronized is
only effective within a single instance of JVM. That is not
groups are mapped to method parameters, e.g. map(/user/
(\\d+), ...) will pass group(1) to get(String userId)
* Automatic injection of standard method parameters, such as
HttpServetRequest and HttpServletResponse
Cheers,
Yegor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
/docs/java/config/queue.html
I do not expect my tasks to exceed 30 seconds, but there might be
exceptions, especially because some tasks make heavy use of URLFetch. I
decided to check here before submitting a bug report in case I'm being
stupid.
Thanks,
Yegor
Do you mean that all pages work, except one? Or not even one works? I am
asking because if it the former, then the problem is page-specific. If it's
the latter, then something's wrong with your application config.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
You probably already know this, but just in case you don't, appid has to
be replaced with your app's real application id, as defined in your
appengine-web.xml (for Java) or app.yaml (for Python).
If you knew this already and you still cannot send emails, then you might
have found a bug in
want to star the issue to get more attention
from the GAE team.
Cheers,
Yegor
On Feb 11, 4:12 am, pac parvez.chau...@gmail.com wrote:
It says here
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/cron.html
A cron job will invoke a URL, using an HTTP GET request, at a given time
of day
a car engine to fly it.
Cheers,
Yegor
On Mar 23, 6:32 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
You should explore:
- Blobstore:http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/blobstore/overview.html
- Google storage:http://code.google.com/apis/storage/
There are other options for application
,
but it is faster than GZIP
Cheers,
Yegor
On May 5, 8:14 pm, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote:
Entity limit is 1MB total. But you could have multiple blobs within one if
they where less than 1MB.
Brandon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Sounds like you are running an old version of JRE/JDK.
On Nov 28, 3:46 pm, AnthoniS anthoni.schioc...@eliium.com wrote:
After upgrading STS to 2.8.1 (based on Eclipse 3.7.1) running on
MacOSX 10.5.8, i am unable to update the AppEngine SDK to 1.6.0. Here
is the error log:
22 matches
Mail list logo
