Vista (a pain), Chrome 3, 0.9 megabits per second connection.. Works around
average. The bigger waves take longer to load, but I guess it's doable.
We're upgrading to 10megabits soon, so should be somewhat better. Ubuntu,
Chrome 4, is faster than Ubuntu firefox (ubuntu 9.04 btw), though neither as
Of course this is possible. There is no protection against that. Some
robots will also need to save (a part) of a message to get the things
done they are supposed to do.
On 7 Okt., 03:42, Wilz alth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm a bit surprised no one asked this question yet (or maybe I'm a
People can also do this. This has nothing to do with robots.
--
http://thewe.net
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Wilz alth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm a bit surprised no one asked this question yet (or maybe I'm a
noob who just doesn't get it heh). After reading through the API
I wonder if they are just using a google spreadsheet for this..
On Oct 6, 3:00 pm, Henrique Pinheiro phen...@gmail.com wrote:
My account was indeed kinda dormant...
I was developing a robot but the Python API was (At the time) incomplete and
somewhat frustrating to work it (not beeing able to
I'm having a hard time here. My app won't even do logging on the most
basic level. After an hour of trying and searching I decided to
register a new gae application, I uploaded the code as is to that
new environment, and there it's working perfectly.
A.appspot.com is not working,
B.appspot.com
Escovado,
I am not sure if I have your requirements correctly. It would seem that you
want to have a combination of embedding and bots. You can certainly embed
the wave client on your site (
http://code.google.com/apis/wave/embed/guide.html) and you can create a bot
(you would have to use the
Hi Eric and Nicolas,
If you are guys are using Eclipse with GAE plugin, try running the
project-clean which will force rebuilding the entire project includeing
the enhance target.
Austin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Nicolas patry.nico...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having the exact same
Glad to help :)
Can you file a feature request to my documentation to include list of native
annotation names?
http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/list
Thanks,
Austin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM, EntropyFails entropyfa...@gmail.comwrote:
Absolutely perfect. Thank you so
The only change made that actually made it work was to remove the
ampersand from $parser since it's not like that in any other parser
extension I have access to. Then it started working. But, I got lots
of error messages due to things like $args[id] which php defaulted to
$args['id'] and ran
FYI the ampersand makes it so the parser object is passed by reference
instead of being copied, so that is a part of PHP and not a typo:
http://us3.php.net/references.pass
That should definitly work and it is what is specified in the
MediaWiki docs.
I don't now what difference putting tics
I just came across something in the Java API that I thought might be
useful in your situation. It seems like the following may be a
slightly more elegant solution:
blip.getDocument().appendMarkup(a href=\http://www.google.com\;To
Google /a);
I haven't used appendMarkup() before, so I am making
The tic thing is definitely an error on my part though (check under
Array do's and don'ts):
http://se2.php.net/manual/en/language.types.array.php
You dont think that it is that alone which is causing the problem?
/Micke
On 7 Okt, 22:07, Jack Park jackp...@gmail.com wrote:
That may be so. I'm
Thanks Greg, that would also work nicely without having to deal with
annotation :)
Austin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, GH gregjho...@gmail.com wrote:
I just came across something in the Java API that I thought might be
useful in your situation. It seems like the following may be a
According to the original error message, it never got to that. I went
so far as to put up a wave / tag with no id, hoping to provoke that
error message. It never got there. Always failed on passing the wrong
thing to $parser
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Micke Nordin mickew...@gmail.com
Not even the most basic stuff works:
main.py
#!/usr/bin/python2.5
import logging
logging.info('base')
from waveapi import events
from waveapi import model
from waveapi import document
from waveapi import robot
def OnBlipSubmitted(properties, context):
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:12 PM, GH gregjho...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to send a lot of data to a robot via a gadget through the
javascript api using the submitDelta() method (so through the gadget
state). What is the most data I can send through? Can I send more
data if I split it up into
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:19:17AM -0700, ThomasWrobel wrote:
Humans should be removable too. Just have the first person as an admin
to that wave.
Got to be very careful here.
I wouldn't want somebody to remove my access to important information
I rely on
(or plan to use in the future) just
My Primary sandbox account is locked (password lost). So i will never
open the mail box to read the invite ...:(
Can you please send the invite on the normal gmail account
(fvisti...@gmail.com).
Fred
On 7 oct, 23:24, pamela (Google employee) pamela@gmail.com
wrote:
We have received some
Greetings,
appendMarkup() does work. I just tested it. Thank you for that!
However, I'll be using Austin's approach because it allows in-place
updating.
Consider this as a request for Feature 76 please. I've added a comment
there on adding replaceMarkup function as well. As a short aside, I
PHP is used by far more than .NET, So it is logical to develop PHP
robots first.
I have seen several PHP API interfacing directly the java code release
from Google for making extensions.
It should tell you that developer community will implement the PHP
robots within a few months.
I think in
Javascript or Ruby is what I would like to code robots in,but again I
like building extensions and not robots.
On Oct 7, 9:23 pm, HR Dadgar hrdad...@gmail.com wrote:
PHP is used by far more than .NET, So it is logical to develop PHP
robots first.
I have seen several PHP API interfacing
Hi Brandon -
Please email me offline with your Wave sandbox username.
- pamela
On Oct 8, 1:22 pm, masemase brandon.blatt...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a Google Wave Sandbox account and have been extremeley
dissapointed to not have received an invite to the program yet. I've
tried all the
Hi Pamela,
I've been searching for both and reading everything in my sandbox, and
I still haven't received an invite.
My username: kamadan
Thanks
On Oct 8, 12:24 am, pamela (Google employee) pamela@gmail.com
wrote:
We have received some reports of developers that have not yet received
For those of you who have used the Invite others wave and are
wondering why your invitees have not yet received invitations, please
read this post:
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/wave/thread?tid=52bfa73ad3090d6b
- pamela
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
I would use Ruby, though I know Google hate it.
PHP... eww. PHP is fine for web stuff but for bots it seems wrong. Yes, I
know that currently, Wave robots run as webapps. That also seems wrong.
Why are they not using XMPP so that things can be done over a protocol
designed for real-time? :-|
Looking into future i would love robot engine to support predicate logic to
make them intelligent
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Trejkaz trej...@gmail.com wrote:
I would use Ruby, though I know Google hate it.
PHP... eww. PHP is fine for web stuff but for bots it seems wrong. Yes, I
know
26 matches
Mail list logo
