Re: UiBinder alternative

UiBinder should not be removed. It's not about widgets, but about convenient way of defining UI. And also it's quite similar to Android way of developing, so quite comfortable for developers with Android experience. On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 8:25:52 AM UTC-7, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > >

Re: Working polymer example?

Did you try running this samples: https://github.com/manolo/gwt-polymer-todo-list OR https://github.com/vaadin/gwt-polymer-elements/tree/master/demo On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 10:00:56 PM UTC-4, Transplant wrote: > > > I've left this alone in the hopes that it would mature with the 2.8

[gwt-contrib] Re: CodeServer with Bookmarklets not working in GWT 2.7 (2nd request)

Workaround, hit dev mode off then compile again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[gwt-contrib] CodeServer with Bookmarklets not working in GWT 2.7 (2nd request)

There are some complicated enterprise configurations where the application is dependent on other applications. And staging this on an external web server is challenging. I've seen enough web server configurations to want bookmarklets to work. I know it's not the preferred way to boot up SDM,

Re: Working polymer example?

I've left this alone in the hopes that it would mature with the 2.8 release, but I still cannot get a sample to run using the tutorial on the gwtproject site. I have followed the instructions neurotically a couple of times, but the only improvement from when I tried it in January is that now

Re: GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

Thank you J! I didn't know jetty was upgraded and yes I did mess up the order & export. once I moved the GWT SDK above the App Engine SDK... all worked well. Yes, I'm aware we need to decouple the client/server but we're a few releases away from that. We're still using GWT RPC and a few other

Re: GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

> What I don't understand is *why is this setup working fine with > gwt-2.8.0-beta1 but it is not working with gwt-2.8.0-rc1 or gwt-2.8.0-rc2. * > Jetty has been upgraded from 8.x to 9.2.x between beta1 and rc1. Maybe your class path order is now different for some reasons and you need to

Re: GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

Hey First off -* thank you very much for all the work you are doing on GWT*. It's great to see all the amazing things coming in 2.8.0. Thank you! Now to the issue that I'm reporting: I'm using the Google Plugin For Eclipse and my project is using GWT (gwt-2.8.0-beta1) and AppEngine (1.9.42).

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

Global object is not scoped to window unless you explicitly say "window"; so it should be $wnd by default. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:50 AM, David wrote: > I was depending on JsInterop Global.document to get access to UI > components generated by my template engine. > The

[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

This is not a fix but a request for enhancement (unless I misremember). This is not "officially" supported, but it happens to work if you suppress validation for those methods. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

This is a last call for patches, anything that is not in until tomorrow (and is not important enough to hold the release) will not get in. Is there already a patch in review for this? On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:40 PM Kay-Uwe Janssen wrote: > Is there a plan to fix the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

Is there a plan to fix the ValdiationTool (issue mentioned here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/lue7vRkkxU8 ) for default and static methods in proxy interfaces? or is it already fixed? if one it should be documented as known issue with the

Re: UiBinder alternative

and one more thing I think publishing news about the major changes in an API early is a good thing, as long the road map and the upgrade process and the alternatives are known, because if not the uncertin things might cause people to backaway from the API, people like to know what is comming

Re: UiBinder alternative

On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 4:41:43 PM UTC+3, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Hi >> Is there any plans or suggestions for the UiBinder alternatives since >> UiBinder will be removed from GWT 3.0? >> > > *might* be

Re: Could not find artifact com.google.jsinterop:jsinterop-annotations

It is still there. I cleared .m2, it did not help. What else I can do ? четверг, 8 сентября 2016 г., 16:54:48 UTC+3 пользователь Klaus Gradinger написал: > > Yeah they seem to be gone (again). however they were there yesterday I > think... > >> >>> -- You received this message because you are

[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

Hi Daniel, On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 4:27:36 PM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Hi all, > > I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, >  > please respond to this email with any outstanding reviews that you want to > see included. > https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/16760 and

[gwt-contrib] Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

Hi all, I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, please respond to this email with any outstanding reviews that you want to see included. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: Could not find artifact com.google.jsinterop:jsinterop-annotations

Yeah they seem to be gone (again). however they were there yesterday I think... On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:21:25 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > See > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2dJqK6FH2_c > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:17:41

Re: UiBinder alternative

On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Hi > Is there any plans or suggestions for the UiBinder alternatives since > UiBinder will be removed from GWT 3.0? > *might* be removed would be more accurate. Let me repeat one more time: development on GWT 3.0 has

Re: UiBinder alternative

Why not just use HTML ? GWT's widget are quite "heavy" and probably will be replaced by web-components down the road. If you really need widgets you can look into Errai framework (http://erraiframework.org/) On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Hi > Is

Re: GWT/GWTP: Communicate data from Parent to Child Presenter

mabye you can use a custom Proxy to do it there, but I do it always in either onReset or prepareFromRequest. On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:41:35 AM UTC+2, harshyadav wrote: > > Thanks for the Reply Ümit, > > I was hoping to see if there is a built in way to handle requests in a >

Re: UiBinder alternative

Elemento is the only one that I can think of: https://github.com/hal/elemento You could also lay your layout in the .html and use elemental for interaction with the elements. Le jeudi 8 septembre 2016 15:00:36 UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh a écrit : > > Hi > Is there any plans or suggestions for the

UiBinder alternative

Hi Is there any plans or suggestions for the UiBinder alternatives since UiBinder will be removed from GWT 3.0? and i wonder why such cool feature should be removed instead of being updated to match the new changes? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

I'm sure that it worked before. I'm also seeing some other issues where I am using JsInterop to interact with some generated HTML - but I am still investigating if that is due to changes in GWT or in our codebase. I did not work on this project for about 8 weeks, so I have quite a backlog to go

Re: Could not find artifact com.google.jsinterop:jsinterop-annotations

See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2dJqK6FH2_c On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:17:41 PM UTC+2, Kirill Prazdnikov wrote: > > After cleaning .m2 i`m getting this error: > > Failed to collect dependencies at >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

I was depending on JsInterop Global.document to get access to UI components generated by my template engine. The Global object is now scoped window, so I guess it is accessing the wrong document as well ? On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 at 11:40, David wrote: > I'm sure that it

Re: Could not find artifact com.google.jsinterop:jsinterop-annotations

After cleaning .m2 i`m getting this error: Failed to collect dependencies at com.google.gwt:gwt-user:jar:2.8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failed to read artifact descriptor for com.google.gwt:gwt-user:jar:2.8.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact com.google.jsinterop:jsinterop:pom:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in

Could not find artifact com.google.jsinterop:jsinterop-annotations

Hi, I`m using maven build and use GWT master. Today I`m getting this error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:gwt-maven-plugin:2.8.0-SNAPSHOT:resources (default) on project cospaces-studio-gwt: Execution default of goal

Re: GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

All that sounds very good. Is there any place where I can read about j2cl ? It source is closed, right ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

gwt.user.rebind.SourceWriter vs gwt.codegen.server.SourceWriter

> I've started to study GWT generators mechanism […] What package should I use? Neither. Don't start using a soon-to-be-deprecated technology. Use an annotation processor instead (pro tip: have a look at the Google auto-common, and Square JavaPoet projects) -- You received this message

Autocompletion with RPC under the MVP model : how to instanciate Suggestbox(suggestOracle) without refering any service into the view ?

You could route the requestSuggestions to your presenter instead if directly to your service (the presenter simply behaving as a proxy/façade to the service). Or you could use a "proxy" Oracle where you can later set the "delegate" (coming from the presenter) -- You received this message