Re: Server side gwt-validation doesn't work (?)

2011-12-07 Thread chris.ruffalo
The Reflections library that gwt-validation uses to mine the classpath for information does not seem to work at all in a containerized environment. See: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/issues/detail?id=52 for more information. On Dec 7, 10:50 am, Nicolas.Rocca nicolas.ro...@t-online.de

Re: Using -compileReport and JUnit

2011-05-12 Thread chris.ruffalo
, chris.ruffalo chris.ruff...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on a GWT extension library and would like to get a compile report.  My project is just an adjunct to GWT and doesn't have any UI.  I will be creating samples when the library is finished but the bulk of my code generation is done now

Using -compileReport and JUnit

2011-05-11 Thread chris.ruffalo
I'm working on a GWT extension library and would like to get a compile report. My project is just an adjunct to GWT and doesn't have any UI. I will be creating samples when the library is finished but the bulk of my code generation is done now. Is there any way to set -compileReport while

Re: GWT overwriting java.util and java.io classes, Generators, and importing source that is in a src-jar

2010-01-27 Thread chris.ruffalo
me to provide a different implementation for ValidatorFactory as well? Will a GWT.create() properly trigger inside of a super ValidatorFactory? Thanks! On Jan 27, 6:12 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 27, 1:51 am, chris.ruffalo chris.ruff...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, list

Re: GWT overwriting java.util and java.io classes, Generators, and importing source that is in a src-jar

2010-01-27 Thread chris.ruffalo
This works like a charm once I figured out exactly what the compiler wanted. I wish it worked a little cleaner in eclipse, but, hey can't always have everything. Thanks a ton for your help. On Jan 27, 9:34 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 27, 2:01 pm, chris.ruffalo chris.ruff

GWT overwriting java.util and java.io classes, Generators, and importing source that is in a src-jar

2010-01-26 Thread chris.ruffalo
Hello, list! I'm trying to get back into writing my JSR-303 compliant validation framework for GWT for a couple of reasons. (http://code.google.com/p/ gwt-validation) 1) They (the JSR group) have released an updated/final proposition. They have also released source code! 2) I have some free

[gwt-contrib] Re: Flurry of Data binding threads

2008-10-09 Thread chris.ruffalo
Going to stick my nose in here a bit: I certainly believe that this is all one ball of wax. I /know/ that the system that I've been working on can be used to modify the data. I know it breaks the JSR-303 paradigm so I've left it alone. The fundamental difference is that I'm expecting some

Annotation based Validation for GWT

2008-10-08 Thread chris.ruffalo
See these two threads: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/browse_thread/thread/22122c096aad94cd It seems that the validation framework I've cooked up will not be used by GWT or be accepted into the

Re: Annotation based Validation for GWT

2008-10-08 Thread chris.ruffalo
I think that we all need to collaborate in this regard. My system looks hard but is really, really, really easy once you see what the ValidatorCreator is doing for the generator and all that. I think you could create formulas for it if you wanted and modify objects in the Constraints themselves

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-10-08 Thread chris.ruffalo
objects from a parent? Thanks, Rex On Oct 6, 8:23 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea, easily.  I didn't mean to make it Java6 specific. isEmpty() seems like a better metaphor, I'll take a loot at it right now. Thanks for pointing that out. On Oct 6, 9:13 am, rb [EMAIL

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-10-08 Thread chris.ruffalo
In the above Example the Parent field should also have an @Valid annotation. Also, instead of updating in the GWT issue 343 thread I'm updating here: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/ It also has the Java5 release for download. On Oct 8, 12:51 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-10-02 Thread chris.ruffalo
. Chris Ruffalo On Sep 12, 3:09 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been looking at :http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343 And I've hit a few snags: Namely:   Hosted mode works fine but compiling tries to rebind twice (even though I only have one

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-09-17 Thread chris.ruffalo
I wasn't including the source files. Disregard. Release should be soon. On Sep 17, 3:38 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One final bit of help. I'm having problems building a jar that will work with the modules to compile under a normal project.  If I export the jar with Eclipse

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-09-17 Thread chris.ruffalo
Released here : http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343 Let me know what you think. On Sep 17, 6:42 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wasn't including the source files.  Disregard.  Release should be soon. On Sep 17, 3:38 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL

[gwt-contrib] GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-09-12 Thread chris.ruffalo
I've been looking at : http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343 And I've hit a few snags: Namely: Hosted mode works fine but compiling tries to rebind twice (even though I only have one GWT.create()) and it can't create the printwriter because the class it is trying

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Issue 343 and the JSR-303 Draft (Implementing in GWT)

2008-09-12 Thread chris.ruffalo
I see. That worked, I guess I was expecting something bad to happen if I didn't write new source. In retrospect why would that happen? Fortunately I don't have to do anything different (per user agent) yet. On Sep 12, 3:39 pm, BobV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Namely:  Hosted mode works fine