Re: GWT with App Engine (standard) and maven?

Thanks, that was the missing info I was looking for (just checked the maven-plugin help etc.)!! What is the recommended setup nowadays when using Eclipse? Is it recommended to use the Eclipse plugin(s) for GWT/GAE or is it better to run everything from the command line? Thanks again, you are the

Re: GWT with App Engine (standard) and maven?

com.google.gwt gwt-dev Do I have to set a "scope"? Thanks again, Daniel On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 12:55:22 PM UTC+1, dflorey wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> after all thos

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Jetty upgrade broke HtmlUnit for window.onerror

com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 6:08:05 PM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: >> >> Patch is accepted and merged into upstream HtmlUnit, see >> https://sourceforge.net/p/htmlunit/bugs/1924/ for more detail. >> >> Daniel, when you can take a look at

[gwt-contrib] Jetty upgrade broke HtmlUnit for window.onerror

forward, we simply do not have the bandwith to do it right now. A simple way of making it happen would be to roll back the jetty upgrade. We are not going to invest further into this for OS, but would rather see somebody else pick this up. Any takers? -Daniel -- You received this message because

Re: GWT 2.8.1 release

There is some reasoning behind us not broadly announcing elemental2 and the jsinteorp generator: They are both still beta software in the sense that we know there are existing problems, but we already want feedback on them. There are still no guarantees on APIs / compat but if you are brave and

MS Edge - readEntries() doesn't work

doesn't work. the error callback just returns 'unknown error'. And i have really no idea why it is not working in MS Edge. FF and Chrome are ok. I am using GWT 2.7 --> an update to 2.8 is not possible because i have to use Java 6. I really hope that anyone of you has any idea for me Best

Re: [gwt-contrib] Digest for google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 2 topics

OK, it looks like the frame boundaries can be crossed in Firefox which yields reality check : true whereas Chrome produces reality check : false. Thanks for the explanation. Beside the JSNI workaround one can also use jsinterop.base.Js.uncheckedCast() for such cases. -- You received this

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 1.0.0-beta-1 and casting behaves unexpectedly

OK, this this particular use case was explained here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8lESs0WMHDM. Thank you Arnaud. On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 7:21:38 PM UTC+2, Daniel Harezlak wrote: > > Js.cast() also throws but Js.uncheckedCast() does no

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 1.0.0-beta-1 and casting behaves unexpectedly

Js.cast() also throws but Js.uncheckedCast() does not. Can anyone elaborate? On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 12:06:08 PM UTC+2, gwtt...@gmail.com wrote: > > How about using jsinterop.base.Js.cast() for the casing instead? - see: >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 1.0.0-beta-1 and casting behaves unexpectedly

The way to work around it is to use a native method: private static native HTMLDocument getHtmlDocument(HTMLIFrameElement frame) /*-{ return frame.contentDocument; }-*/; Is this required? On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 8:23:20 AM UTC+2, Daniel Harezlak wrote: > > Hi, I have the fol

GWT module with Jsinterop exports but without an entry point is skipped during production compilation

Hi, For a module with Jsinterop exports to be compiled I need to create a dummy entry point, otherwise it is skipped. I have the generateJsInteropExports flag set. The module inherits only from com.google.gwt.user.User and elemental2.dom.Dom modules which I suppose do not have entry points of

[gwt-contrib] Elemental2 1.0.0-beta-1 and casting behaves unexpectedly

Hi, I have the following code using elemental2-dom: HTMLIFrameElement frame = (HTMLIFrameElement) DomGlobal.document. createElement("iframe"); HTMLDocument doc = (HTMLDocument) frame.contentDocument; //throws java.lang.ClassCastException The second line throws an exception although I am quite

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 source code on github

Hi, it looks like issues are disabled for the https://github.com/google/elemental2 project. On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 12:34:09 AM UTC+2, Julien Dramaix wrote: > > If you have any questions/issues, feel free to open a bug in the github > project. > -- You received this message because you

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

Hi, I just tested it and the asFunction method needs the @JsOverlay annotation for this to compile. After the modification the code works as expected. Thanks! On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 11:32:47 PM UTC+2, Julien Dramaix wrote: > > I forgot to mention: as a workaround, you can create your own

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

Hi, where did the URL class go? Previously I had it under elemental2.URL. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

JsInterop and Function.prototype.apply 'this' argument

Hi, as you probably know, in plain JS methods like apply or call allow you to pass any object for "this". Now, some JS libraries provide methods where you can pass some callback function, which is performed after some operation has finished. Some libraries choose to pass some special object

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop & collections

? > > How would I call Array.prototype.push.apply(arrayList, value); via > JsInterop? Or if I wanted to add a function to an existing object? > > Thank you, > Marcin > > > On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 20:02:46 UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: > >> First of all do not use JSNI going fo

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop & collections

run(String key, Object value); } // usage: MyObject o = (MyObject) JSON.parse(s, (key, value) -> { // whatever change you need to do return value; }); -Daniel On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:53 AM <supp...@bpilotglobal.com> wrote: > > I am still new to GWT (so this code is probabl

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+2, Daniel Harezlak wrote: >> >> HI, what are the replacements for elemental2.Global.window and similar >> in this new release? >> > >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

HI, what are the replacements for elemental2.Global.window and similar in this new release? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Compilation of a large GWT application?

UTC+3 пользователь Daniel Kurka > написал: > > If you compile your gwt app with -generateJsInteropExports any @JsType is > accessible in global scope: > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To

Re: Compilation of a large GWT application?

If you compile your gwt app with -generateJsInteropExports any @JsType is accessible in global scope: Exporting app: package foo; @JsType public Bar { public Baz baz = new Baz(); } Consuming JS: new Bar().baz.baz1(); Consuming gwt app ( No need for -generateJsInteropExports):

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: A possible JsInterop issue in GWT 2.8 RC2

This tripped me up as well. I second adding a note to the Javadoc as Boris suggested. On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 10:07:00 PM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: > > Document includes a comment about it in the examples and the section that > describes the migration from 2.7 has an instruction to

Re: doesn't work

I am using GWT 2.8.0 Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 12:46:27 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hello, > > i try to integrate my gwt app into a normal plain html page (code > "integrationPrototyp.html" see below). > > When running the integrationPrototyp.h

doesn't work

5.cache.js At first, what is the reason for this problem? Second, how to fix it? But i think just to know, why it doesn't works could help me already a lot. Thank you a lot :) Best regards daniel body{ margin: 10px auto; <!--max-width: 60em;--> } *

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

to remove the -ea argument worked too. i could remove the comment in my xml file and got a positive result. Thank you by the way, yes i am using gwt version 2.7 Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 11:52:33 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hi, > > i setted in the run config the arg

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

Thank you thomas, caused by your hint i could find the mistake. in my gwt.xml file i added a block comment around: this solved the problem. Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 11:52:33 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hi, > > i setted in the run config the arg: -Dgwt.args="-

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

rowser version"); JsArray browserInformation = BrowserParameter.getBrowserVersion(); System.out.println("Browser information: " + browserInformation); // do sth. with browserInformaton System.out.println("Test 1 finish"); } Am Dienstag, 14. Februa

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:382) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:192) Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 11:52:33 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hi, > > i setted in the run co

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

the image shows my browser result. they say in the text that this should happen, but it doesn t work. so i need an alternativ with the same result except selenium. Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 11:52:33 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hi, > > i setted in the run config the arg

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

Manual:1 to the -Dgwt.args part. Manual mode can also be used for remote browser testing <http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideTestingRemoteTesting.html#Manual> . Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 11:52:33 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hi, > > i setted in the run config t

Re: GWT junit test in super dev mode???

URL: http://10.0.75.1:51428/de.abc.application.Application.JUnit/junit.html?gwt.codesvr=10.0.75.1:51426 pasting link into browser (i tried ff, chrome and edge) Thank you Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 11:52:33 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kln: > > Hi, > > i setted in the run config the ar

GWT junit test in super dev mode???

Plugin My question: how i can avoid this problem. In production mode the same result appears. Thank you a lot for your help Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: PROPOSAL: a devserver to replace devmode

I am seeing a lot of arguments pop up about GWT RPC, but I think it should not be considered for this discussion at all. In my mind GWT 2.8 will be the last release that has GWT RPC and people should start migrating. I think its perfectly fine do design a replacement to devmode without GWT RPC

Re: GWT 2.8.0 released

. These docs are not being maintained by the GWT team at Google and we rely on open source contributions to update them. -Daniel On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:16 PM Alex W <alexwhite3...@gmail.com> wrote: > The GWT team couldn't even be bothered to delete the out of date docs on > gw

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.8 (final) is released very silent!?

I just sent the announcement to gwt-users that its now final, the reason you could see the tag is that I pushed this as part of our release process. The reason the tag is 17 days old is that its identical with that commit (we have not changed GWT), traditionally we just turn the RC into the final

GWT 2.8.0 released

#Release_Notes_2_8_0 Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co

Re: Couldn't load AppFrontEnd from Super Dev Mode

I have the same problem. Any news? On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 10:04:40 PM UTC+3, Farrukh Shakil wrote: > > My GWT+Maven setup stopped working after upgrading to 2.7. I am running > both GWT+MAVEN (gwt:run) and GWT+MAVEN+Eclipse (as google web application) > using built in jetty and

Re: Extending native JsTypes from Java with GWT 2.8.0-rc2

If you file a bug please include a simple repro case. In general this seems to be working fine (and is used withing google). So there must be something specific about our particular case. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM Thomas Broyer wrote: > It should be possible, from

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: CodeServer with Bookmarklets not working in GWT 2.7 (2nd request)

This is what recompile on reload is for, you can simply always load: http://[sdmhost]:[sdmport]/recompile-requester/[module] On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:53 PM JonL wrote: > I've had to do this when working on a sdm compiled application in a web > wrapper on ios, instead

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

+Goktug Gokdogan <gok...@google.com> +Roberto Lublinerman <rlu...@google.com> Should we be holding RC3, I guess so right? On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:12 PM Jens <jens.nehlme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can you file an issue and ping Daniel (by mail or hangout)

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

erfaceValidation workaround mentioned. > > > Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 16:27:36 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Kurka: > > Hi all, > > I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, please respond to this email with > any outstanding reviews that you want to see included. > &g

[gwt-contrib] Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

Hi all, I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, please respond to this email with any outstanding reviews that you want to see included. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this grou

Re: CalenderUtil Date Math BUG - GWT 2.8 RC2

Does this code do the same thing in 2.7? On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:41 PM Paul Robinson wrote: > You don't say what part of this you think is a bug. I presume it's the > fact that Aug 31 plus one month is Oct 1. If so, this is not a bug. > > Adding one month should do

Setting GWT log levels for individual packages/classes

Is it possible to set different log levels for different packages/classes with GWT's default logger? In the standard java's logging utility you would set the following in the logging.properties file: javax.jms.connection.level = OFF to disable logging for the javax.jms.connection package. The

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: A possible JsInterop issue in GWT 2.8 RC2

Jens is spot on. We want people to explicitly use -generateJsInteropExports if they rely on exporting since it has a hit on code size. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:56 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > FWIW, I believe this is >

GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

, in the mean time you can take a look at the github repository <https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt-site/blob/master/src/main/markdown/release-notes.md#Release_Notes_2_8_0_RC2> . Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

the mean time you can take a look at the github repository <https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt-site/blob/master/src/main/markdown/release-notes.md#Release_Notes_2_8_0_RC2> . Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &

Re: GWT 2.7 - MultiModule Setup and SDM recompilation

Even at Google for really large projects recompile times do not exceed 15seconds. So something is wrong in your setup since we only do recompile changed files after the first compile. Are you giving enough ram to SDM? Are you really only changing a few files (or is something else updating

[gwt-contrib] Last call for GWT 2.8.0 RC2

Hi all, I think we have all patches in place for putting out an RC2. If you feel strongly that something should make RC2 please raise this on this thread. I will be cutting RC2 tomorrow PST time. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quo

2.8.0 RC1 is here!

.md#Release_Notes_2_8_0_RC1> . Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroup

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 RC1 is here!

the mean time you can take a look at the github repository <https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt-site/blob/master/src/main/markdown/release-notes.md#Release_Notes_2_8_0_RC1> . Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

e RC1 tag can still "move" if we find bugs during the smoke tests >> (it **would** move, as I found small issues, e.g. >> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/15445) >> >> Ideally, you should use the gwt-2.8.0-rc1.zip provided by Daniel as input >> to the maven

FileUpload doesn't jumps in ChangeHandler

Hello together, i would like to know why after selecting a directory, the onChange method isn't triggered? Thank you very much for your help. Code: public class CenterPanel extends ScrollPanel { final FileUpload fileUpload = new FileUpload(); public CenterPanel(final GoogleUploader

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

the new GWT release, please reach out to me. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributor

Re: GWT RPC in GWT 3.0+

code (taking into account their >> CustomFieldSerializer if one exists). >> RPC (thus probably Atmosphere) could be made to work (as annotation >> processors) if they use another mechanism to determine what can be >> transferred (e.g. annotations similar to RequestFactory's

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8 rc1 work items

if these reviews make it before we cut RC1 they can go in otherwise I will hold them until after we have shipped 2.8.0. Also keep in mind that we need a green build before cutting RC1 in open source (and this only runs daily), so we should not be merging lots of patches at the last minute. -Daniel On Sun, Jun

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 rc1 work items

the are not really verified). - Anything else I might have missed? Do you guys have anything else to add to the list? -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Generator and Linker maintenance and changes

allow these things to go into generators. With the exception of GWT RPC all generators should be easily portable to an APT. I would love to see work being put into that direction rather than updating a system we are all not happy with. -Daniel On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:59 AM Jens <jens.neh

Re: RAM memory continously increasing while using GWT Application in IE Browser

I vaguely remember fixing a bug around IE10 and tables in GWT. So if that code is using a HtmlTable or FlexTable I suggest upgrading to GWT 2.7 at least. On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM thamarai kannan wrote: > Hi Velusamy sir, > > sorry, I can not share the code.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT compiler crash

With j2cl we do a javac compile up front and thus those basic problems are gone. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:22 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > Agreed - validating supersource is tricky. I've heard of some good options > lately that change how the project interacts with them (like

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Rules for managing issues on GitHub

Nice work Thomas, really appreciated! On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:11 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > FWIW, I started doing some of the things I highlighted in the document: > >- created GitHub milestones and replaced the Milestone-* labels with >assignments to the

Re: GWT no longer working with Chrome 49

About production issue: Are you sure about this? It's less likely to happen in production since many clinit calls will have been stripped by the compiler, but its probably still going to happen. About development: Is there actually a global try catch in your code or is this even something

Re: GWT no longer working with Chrome 49

Hi, Chrome 49 enabled lots of ES6 features, see: http://v8project.blogspot.de/2016/01/v8-release-49.html Part of this is the so called sloppy function hosting. A simple example: ES5 (old semantics) ES2015 (new semantics) Code try { function foo() { foo=function(){};

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Compiler failing with java 7

We have seen issues internally where some code would be a compile error in Java8 but not in Java7 (especially around type checking). This setup will leave users vulnerable to this since their code will compile in their IDE, but will fail GWT compile. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:57 AM Manuel

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run GWTTestCase in Eclipse

/ user/test/ user/test-super/ Hope that helps, Daniel On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:02 PM Michael Zhou <zhoumotongxue...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a test under gwt-user/core/test/com/google/gwt/emultest/ that I > want to run in Eclipse. > I imported gwt-user and gwt-dev according t

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run GWTTestCase in Eclipse

there. This will also allow you to do debugging directly in that browser On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:42 PM Michael Zhou <zhoumotongxue...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Is there a way to print / log stuff / debug when running a GWTTestCase in > Eclipse? System.out.println() or breakpoi

Re: Is it possible to disable assertions in GWT development mode?

I also would like to disable assertions while debugging GWT. I agree that in general assertions are a good thing and it seems obvious you'd always want them, but sometimes there are assertions in dev mode for code that that runs fine in production, Though they don't affect production I

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-beta1 available for testing

es you encounter by either discussion here or filing bugs on github <https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/new>. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[gwt-contrib] Help testing the GWT 2.8 release

, - Windows IE8 - Window IE9 - OSX safari - Firefox (Linux or mac) We should have either chrome on mac and firefox on linux or the other way around. If you are interested in helping to test the release send me an email and I'll share details with you! -Daniel -- You received this message

Re: Problem with GWT 2.5.1 + FF 40

This has been fixed in GWT 2.7.0. We refactored the history implementation to not special case Firefox in this particular way. Just updating to GWT 2.7 will fix this issue for you. If that is not possible here is the main patch to make history work: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5356/

Re: [gwt-contrib] I think the 2.7.0 GWT release was compiled on Daniel Kurka's machine !

It's not my desktop machine, but you are right I did the final compilation of the release. I thought we had already killed of gwttars anyway. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015, 11:21 AM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, I had a closer look to the thing. The paths mentionning your home

Re: [gwt-contrib] I think the 2.7.0 GWT release was compiled on Daniel Kurka's machine !

Hi Arnaud, how are you producing these? -Daniel On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:06 AM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Just dumping a bit of errors i get for a project : Tracing compile failure path for type 'java.lang.Object' [INFO] [ERROR] Errors in 'file: */usr/local/google/home

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3 Build System

As a side note: We had a discussion to make j2cl be able to compile itself to JavaScript. If that is actually done you can easily integrate with all kinds of JavaScript build tools. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:16 PM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I've been watching an

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3 Build System

One other thing: It won't matter which system we use to build the new compiler. Google internal we always use our own build system and since its very close to bazel it should work fine with bazel. If you want some kind of other integration with other build systems you can easily build them since

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Stop calling it GWT 3.0

, nothing is set in stone and we (the steering committee) need your input on this. -Daniel On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 4:51 PM Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.com wrote: Also think of people who use GWT for non web based project. We use GWT for example to create native mobile apps with Titanium

GWT super dev mode unable to step the code in the method of inner class

Dear all, I am tried to step in the method of inner class. I have break in the method. However, no break in the step. Please kindly help Regards Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [gwt-contrib] A new library to integrate GWT with any CSS Framework

Hi Arnaud, great work! Have you considered using a APT generator instead of hooking into the old GWT Generator API? -Daniel On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I come up here to let you know about a library i build, aiming

Re: [gwt-contrib] How to include changesets to an existing gerrit review?

You make the changes in your local git client and amend the commit: 'git commit --amend' Then you just push to gerrit: 'git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master' and this will update the review. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've

Re: [gwt-contrib] com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver cannot be compiled with java6

Yes the readme needs to be updated. Trunk does not support java6 anymore. Mind sending a patch? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi team, I've just imported gwt-dev in Eclipse and I saw there is only one class that doesn't compile:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8: Turn GSS on by default

the default in trunk to gss and turn auto conversion off to get the upgrade message. -Daniel On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:20 PM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: If we remove old css completely, that means we will force auto-conversion

Re: [gwt-contrib] Javascript Exceptions in SDM about classes not being defined

This looks like the same compiler bug we are currently investigating, for now you can clear your SDM cache (button on its page) and you should be able to continue. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Ali Akhtar ali.rac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT, from

Re: [gwt-contrib] What constitutes an acceptable emulated String.format implementation?

Hi Benjamin, thanks for reaching out to us. Answers are inline. On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Benjamin DeLillo bpd9...@gmail.com wrote: For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire Java Formater spec?

Re: [gwt-contrib] Where do I find my password for gerrit?

Here is how you do it: 1. Go to http://gwt-review.googlesource.com 2. Upper left corner press on the arrow right of our login name 3. Press preferences 4. Press HTTP Password 5. Press Obtain password -Daniel On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Richard Wallis rdwal...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks

Singular (Angular for crossplatform) talk at GWT.create

Hi all, here is me talking about Singular at GWT.create: http://gwtcreate.com/videos/index.html#singular -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [gwt-contrib] Compile error with latest gwt (from trunk)

Are you sure that there is not another version of GWT somewhere in the classpath? On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Stefano Pulze stefano.pulz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, Today I've updated and build latest gwt from trunk. I've tried to compile my project but the compilar said: Caused by:

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi Luca, we are intentionally not deploying right now, but we will eventually sort this out. I am sorry but we do not have an ETA for that. -Daniel On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:20 PM, luca.masini luca.mas...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone take the time to fix the problem with the CI system

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Build server is down

This is a known thing and we can't change that for a short period of time. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Update: it's not down (as it built this night), just unreachable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Generators vs java annotation processing

I will be presenting something around that at GWT.create - http://gwtcreate.com/#agenda-us_room1_event9 http://gwtcreate.com/#agenda-us_room1_event9 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: GWT itself won't run annotation processors (yet), but if your IDE runs

Re: [gwt-contrib] Incremental Scheduler can be about 10% faster

I think we do not want to make any assumptions about runtime of any tasks since this would not work well with task that have variable runtime. If you need to do heavy calculations since browser APIs have evolved a lot you should be using web workers anyway. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:57 AM,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

I am really curious why this is not working for you in the first place. Since the code we added to SDM should always scope you down to one permutation. Are you still using bookmarklets? (These do not deal with this properly and should not be used anymore). On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Rob

GWT 2.7.0 is here

issue tracker. Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team at Google -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: [gwt-contrib] SDM memory footprint

will not have a productive working environment. -Daniel On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Nicolas Morel nmr.mo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm currently trying to migrate a big project at work from GWT 2.5.1 to 2.7.0 to test the new SDM. Even if the recompile took 1-2 min on 2.5.1, the SDM

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run any GWTTestCase

On the run rght now, but john merged a patch in that area yesterday, can you try reverting that one? On Friday, November 14, 2014, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote: I've updated my master branch (of the GWT-core project) the with the remote and now I'm not able to run any GWT test

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run any GWTTestCase

Deleted all unit caches? On Nov 14, 2014 1:10 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote: I have this problem for several days in fact. It's why I think the problem is on my side. On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 1:05:30 PM 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] SDM in 2.7.0-rc1 doesn't support inclusion in 3rd party sites

Can you take a look at this and let me know if this helps you out? https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tal Shani tsh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am writing a GWT generated JS script that is hosted by several sites. 2.7.0 introduced a

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

prod = production = optimized. SDM in incremental code does not do any optimizations. Normal GWT compiles optimize a lot. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: @Daniel Sorry for my stupid question but what is the difference? How do I do prod compiles

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

I added a tracking item for updating SDM docs before 2.7.0 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Matic Petek maticpe...@gmail.com wrote: Jens, Thank you. Now it's working. SDM documentation should really be updated - http://www.gwtproject.org/articles/superdevmode.html Regards, Matic On

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >