Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-31 Thread Peter Donald
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:55 AM Rob Newton wrote: > A contributor may develop something new or port something, and then > announce it to the community that it is available for use, but there is no > central site listing/promoting these wares. > A central place would be nice and has been tried

Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-31 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
@Bob We do really understand how you feel, we were there at some point. BUT On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 10:31:38 PM UTC+3, Bob Lacatena wrote: > > GWT is suffering from a very serious publicity debacle. I'm actively > doing GWT development, and regretting every moment of it right now. Years

Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-31 Thread Frank Hossfeld
Bob, you are right! At the moment, there is no communication, so GWT might look dead. The only way to get informations for now is to visit the Gitter rooms for gwtproject https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt and j2cl https://gitter.im/vertispan/j2cl. Many contributors are working on GWT 3 to

Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-31 Thread Frank Hossfeld
Bob, you are right! At the moment, there is no communication, so GWT might look dead. The only way to get informations for now is to visit the Gitter rooms for gwtproject https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt and j2cl https://gitter.im/vertispan/j2cl. Many contributors are working on GWT 3 to

Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-30 Thread Rob Newton
I can sympathise with some of what Bob is saying. >From what I can gather there is actually a great flux of activity going on behind the scenes by parts of the community. The main players in moving GWT forward appear to be half-a-dozen or so companies who use GWT greatly, and some

Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-30 Thread Bob Lacatena
GWT is suffering from a very serious publicity debacle. I'm actively doing GWT development, and regretting every moment of it right now. Years ago I loved GWT. Today, I'm dreading it. My biggest problem for the past year has been the fact that unless one hunts for threads like this, GWT

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-11 Thread Craig Mitchell
> > This may be true running the TodomvcProd.gwt.xml but if you run > TodomvcDev.gwt.xml it should be fine. We don't use Maven at work so I may > have misconfigured the tooling :/ > I did try to run the TodomvcDev.gwt.xml, however, I needed to remove TodomvcProd from GWT General Settings

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-11 Thread Peter Donald
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:04 PM Craig Mitchell wrote: > You can use both of them together ;) We use react+GWT and absolutely love >> it. We use a state management library Arez (https://arez.github.io/) >> which is very similar conceptually to Mobx done in Java style. You can see >> a sample

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-11 Thread Craig Mitchell
> > You can use both of them together ;) We use react+GWT and absolutely love > it. We use a state management library Arez (https://arez.github.io/) > which is very similar conceptually to Mobx done in Java style. You can see > a sample application @ >

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-08 Thread Peter Donald
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:34 PM Craig Mitchell wrote: > I took a break from GWT to develop in React for 2 years. While the React > structure is okay, writing in JS is just painful. TypeScript looked a > little better, but never got the chance to dive into it. Now I'm back > using GWT and

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-07 Thread Craig Mitchell
+1 keep up the great work! I took a break from GWT to develop in React for 2 years. While the React structure is okay, writing in JS is just painful. TypeScript looked a little better, but never got the chance to dive into it. Now I'm back using GWT and loving it! Also finding it hard to

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-07 Thread Norbert Bartels
This is really great to know. I really like GWT and building applications with it is awesome. But it is hard to argue against the Angular guys in the company if the latest GWT version is more than 1 year old. But I'm looking forward to see the next update and especially to check GWT 3.0 as

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-03 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
More than ever before. Event this group indicate that it is a very active project, at least in terms of community, but also development is active around getting GWT 3.0 ready. On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 8:58:47 AM UTC+2, carl.hos...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello all! I am wondering how

Re: Is this project active?

2019-03-28 Thread Nick Wilton
It’s very active. See https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt -Nick > On 28 Mar 2019, at 13:28, carl.hostrande...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello all! I am wondering how active this project is? Don't see much action > on the releases and comments. > > Another question I have is if this project is

Re: Is this project active?

2019-03-28 Thread Peter Donald
I think the project is more active now than it has been in a long time. It is just that the work is spread out over a few different places. Most work atm seems to be towards getting to GWT3.x The java-to-js compiler is under active development at https://github.com/google/j2cl - the browser apis

Re: Is this project active?

2019-03-28 Thread Jens
Java 11 language/syntax support has just been committed: https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt/+/205b88a4d88cc0c23b2cd0df681a18d114443a7c Currently in the GWT 2.x versions only minimal work will be done. Contributors focus their work on splitting GWT SDK into smaller pieces and make them J2CL