Hurray! :D
Thousands of thanks to the GWT-plugin team (as we say it here in Sweden ;)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Gugas carlos.mfa.mart...@gmail.com wrote:
Well done everybody!!!
We can crack open the champaigne!
3.5 plugin is out!!!
On 29 Jul, 17:05, petB peter.bo...@gmail.com
Hey guys,
IT'S OUT!
http://dl.google.com/eclipse/plugin/3.5
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To
Well done everybody!!!
We can crack open the champaigne!
3.5 plugin is out!!!
On 29 Jul, 17:05, petB peter.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 10:14 pm, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you know anything about software development, then you know that
any and all development time
On Jul 28, 10:14 pm, Juraj Vitko juraj.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you know anything about software development, then you know that
any and all development time estimation is just a wild guess.
It is still a good practice to provide release estimates, whatever
imprecise.
I just finished one
If you know anything about software development, then you know that
any and all development time estimation is just a wild guess.
And it is up to the one who asks for the estimations, to not confuse
them with truth. (ok don't tell that to your clients or bosses:)
The rule of thumb I use: if it's
Not to defend dependency on the plugin, but the fact is that gwt
coders keep saying that it will be out very shortly and this has kept
a good number of us hanging.
I understand that the realease has been delayed because quality comes
first, as it should, but it would show a bit more
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Gugas carlos.mfa.mart...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to defend dependency on the plugin, but the fact is that gwt
coders keep saying that it will be out very shortly and this has kept
a good number of us hanging.
I understand that the realease has been delayed
None of the plugin developers has made an announcement or offered a
release date. They have responded to questions from anxious developers
eager to see the new version by offering their own hopes or
expectations for delivery. That's more then you get from many
projects, partially for the very
I agree with Isaac 100%. The attitude was completely inappropriate.
If a project is time sensitive then it wasn't wise to take the risk
and
wait for the next release. When one takes risks one should only
blame him/her-self.
We should thank google developers for being responsive, for the
Just to clarify a few things:
1. I demand absolutely nothing and I have nothing but high regard for
the coders at google who develop the gwt framework.
2. I have no project on hold for lack of the plugin. I was simply
wanting to test it on Galileo, see how well it works.
3. My earlier comment was
So...just curious...when will the plugin be ready. Some of us have
been waiting over a month. It is very unfortunate the way this is
delaying our project. Do you recommend we move back to 3.4 Eclipse or
turn elsewhere for solutions? Or is the fix really gonna come within
the next week?
It certainly is unfortunate that you would be delaying your project
because of a single convenience plugin. I would recommend that you
strive for more self-sufficiency and less sense of entitlement.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, SuperEvaeva.andreas...@gmail.com wrote:
So...just
Hi Rajeev,
You guys are still going to support the version for Eclipse 3.4,
right?
I am just hoping that you guys don't forget that not everyone can be
Google Wave and code against a constantly (and very rapidly) moving
platform.
Thanks,
Yaakov.
On Jul 22, 11:46 am, Rajeev Dayal
Don't worry. Release 1.1 of the plugin will support Eclipse 3.3, 3.4 and
3.5. However, we are considering deprecating support for Eclipse 3.3 in the
1.2 release of our plugin.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Yaakov yaakov.chai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rajeev,
You guys are still going to
We're now heading towards months, not weeks.
Any progress?
On Jun 25, 10:17 pm, Alex Rudnick a...@google.com wrote:
If you enjoyed this thread, you may also like
Hi,
Yes, this has taken longer than expected, but we're now on the finishing
touches. We should have something out there within the week.
Thanks,
Rajeev
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Nik nikcol...@gmail.com wrote:
We're now heading towards months, not weeks.
Any progress?
On Jun 25,
Ya, some of us have been waiting a long time to go to Java 6 on Mac OS
X. Java 6 is only available (on Mac) as a 64-bit binary, so the old
Carbon-based Eclipse wouldn't run on it (SWT native bindings and
whotnot). Now, I'm running Galileo AND Ganymede (for GWT). But I'm
all itchy to ditch
I vote for new and shiny! Really cocoa is way better. - mattb
On Jul 2, 10:27 am, Ariejan de Vroom arie...@gmail.com wrote:
Count me in for the 3.5 plugin!
I'm using 3.5 because there's a cocoa version that runs übersmooth on
my Mac ;-) Carbon is plain ugly and quite slow.
On Jul 2, 1:25
That's the best reason ;)
On Jul 1, 11:26 pm, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes that is always a good reason!
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Thomas
Matthijsthomas.matth...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 13:56, Daviddavid.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity:
Count me in for the 3.5 plugin!
I'm using 3.5 because there's a cocoa version that runs übersmooth on
my Mac ;-) Carbon is plain ugly and quite slow.
On Jul 2, 1:25 pm, Kango_V djb.b...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the best reason ;)
On Jul 1, 11:26 pm, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes
Just out of curiosity:
What are the main drivers to move to Galileo? We are also working on a
large GWT application and are currently standardized on Ganymede. Are
there new features really worth the switch ?
David
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Vanvandil...@gmail.com wrote:
The sooner the
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 13:56, Daviddavid.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity:
What are the main drivers to move to Galileo? We are also working on a
large GWT application and are currently standardized on Ganymede. Are
there new features really worth the switch ?
David
But it's
Yes that is always a good reason!
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Thomas
Matthijsthomas.matth...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 13:56, Daviddavid.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity:
What are the main drivers to move to Galileo? We are also working on a
large GWT
The sooner the better. My team is developing a large GWT application
and need to move to Galileo ASAP.
Van
On Jun 25, 5:17 pm, Alex Rudnick a...@google.com wrote:
If you enjoyed this thread, you may also like
When will a version of the plugin be released for Eclipse 3.5 (or can
I simply use the version for 3.4). I would like to use the new
Eclipse, but GWT has become one of my main tools.
Thanks,
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
We're currently working on Eclipse 3.5 support. We don't have an exact
release date for an Eclipse 3.5-compatible version of the plugin, but it
will be coming soon (weeks, not months).
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rob Tanner caspersg...@gmail.com wrote:
When will a version of the plugin be
If you enjoyed this thread, you may also like these:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/a27148f95036d847
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/a4bc1419b5f6c247
We're working on it *right now*, rest assured!
On Thu, Jun 25,
Awesome! Count me in. Me is also waitin'. :-)
FYI: Google Plugin 3.4 is not compatible with Eclipse 3.5.0
On Jun 25, 2:17 pm, Alex Rudnick a...@google.com wrote:
If you enjoyed this thread, you may also like
28 matches
Mail list logo
