Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

Thomas gets it all correct. I just want to add one thing: If you are happy with the current GWT stack (uibinder + widget ...), stay with it. As I mentioned during the key notes, the GWT 2.8 will be a long maintenance release and you have now everything you need to do a great web app. Don't try to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

On Monday, 16 November 2015 12:34:51 UTC, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:29:14 AM UTC+1, Robert Stone wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 15 November 2015 15:37:29 UTC, Stephen Haberman wrote: >>> >>> >>> My worry about "just pick a mainstream JS framework and use it

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

On Monday, 16 November 2015 12:51:35 UTC, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 1:28:16 PM UTC+1, stuckagain wrote: >> >> Thanks for all the feedback. But it does not put my mind at rest right >> now. >> >> It would have been much better if GWT 2.8 would have provided

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:29:14 AM UTC+1, Robert Stone wrote: > > > > On Sunday, 15 November 2015 15:37:29 UTC, Stephen Haberman wrote: >> >> >> My worry about "just pick a mainstream JS framework and use it via >> JSInterop" is that if you're a) coupled to a JS environment for unit

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 1:28:16 PM UTC+1, stuckagain wrote: > > Thanks for all the feedback. But it does not put my mind at rest right > now. > > It would have been much better if GWT 2.8 would have provided at least the > basis for the future of GUI development - because that was

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

David Chandler from Sencha answered a question about widgets and GWT 3.0: https://www.sencha.com/forum/showthread.php?306057-GWT-3.0-Sencha-GXT-and-the-future-of-the-widget-eco-system- "Thanks for the kinds words about GXT. We still don't have any more info on GWT 3 than what has been

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: New JsInterop document

Ok, I think the issue regarding setLabels(String[] labels) is my fault. Previously I had an interface that was annotated with @JsType and a class that was implementing it and when I switched to the latest JS_RC JsInterop I re-created the implementing class from scratch but with empty

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

Thanks for all the feedback. But it does not put my mind at rest right now. It would have been much better if GWT 2.8 would have provided at least the basis for the future of GUI development - because that was one of its main selling points for me. I understand why element/widget/uibinder are

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

> I'm not talking about a re-write here, I'm talking about new projects. For > new projects, I can't see a compelling reason for picking GWT, if the devs > are going to have to understand JS to use GWT then it is better to invest > up front time in getting them familiar enough with JS to use

[gwt-contrib] Need help with test case

Hi I am trying to write a test case for https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/7247 There was an old test in https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/7247#issue-87058425 that reproduces the problem. I am trying to narrow it down and implement it as part of the existing

[gwt-contrib] Re: Need help with test case

I would also like a tip on how to run that testcase alone. Right now I am doing this: (cd user && ant test -Dtest.emma.selenium.disable=true -Dtest.draft.htmlunit.disable=true -Dtest.coverage.htmlunit.disable=true -Dtest.nometa.htmlunit.disable=true -Dtest.nongwt.disable=true

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

> I guess I will be trying UiBinder with GQuery and not rely on Widget for > my project. The UiBinder might disappear, but we are using mostly plain > HTML and Bootstrap styles. So we are only interested in binding events. The > UiBinder templates will be easy to migrate later on. > FWIW this is

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

Errai UI ? On 17 Nov 2015 00:41, "Stephen Haberman" wrote: > > >> I guess I will be trying UiBinder with GQuery and not rely on Widget for >> my project. The UiBinder might disappear, but we are using mostly plain >> HTML and Bootstrap styles. So we are only

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

My hope would be that some enterprising individuals will start porting pieces of GWT generators to annotation processors in the future. Some of them are definitely doable without much effort (CssResource/ClientBundle/etc) Some of them will require more work, but are still possible (UiBinder with

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

On Sunday, 15 November 2015 15:37:29 UTC, Stephen Haberman wrote: > > > My worry about "just pick a mainstream JS framework and use it via > JSInterop" is that if you're a) coupled to a JS environment for unit > testing and b) interfacing with a framework that is inherently > dynamic/untyped,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: New JsInterop document

Thanks for the info. AFAIK JSNI syntax will go away at some point. I guess I would then rely on a utility class to do that. One more question: Are there any restrictions regarding @JsProperty fields and Arrays ? somehow following thing dosn't work (it's not set on the object , stays

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: New JsInterop document

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Ümit Seren wrote: > Thanks for the info. > > AFAIK JSNI syntax will go away at some point. I guess I would then rely on > a utility class to do that. > > There is going to be a replacement for JSNI by supplying supplementary js files. So if