Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop Object Literal

Thank you! That's awesome. On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 12:08:10 AM UTC-7, Ray Cromwell wrote: > > Right now, the best you can do is > > @JsType(isNative = true, namespace =JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object") > class MyLiteral { > } > > And put js properties on the object > > > On Sat, Mar

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop Object Literal

Right now, the best you can do is @JsType(isNative = true, namespace =JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object") class MyLiteral { } And put js properties on the object On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Brandon Donnelson wrote: > I found a doc talking about object literal

[gwt-contrib] JsInterop Object Literal

Can JsInterop create an object literal? var foo = {a:0, b:1}; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop Object Literal

I found a doc talking about object literal creation https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DFrC-GtcK7cu6DGxaWCswvb2fai9cnrWPvGcdgsKlBw/edit. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[gwt-contrib] Re: Constructing a new JsType(isNative=true) object

isNative means there has to be some existing javascript class the java type is wrapping. Is there a javascript class? On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 1:37:21 PM UTC-7, Paul Stockley wrote: > > Is it legal to call new on a class marked as JsType(isNative=true)? When I > try it, I get a runtime