I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we
eliminate one of them.
Thanks.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Marshall
Date: 7/18/06 10:37 am
To: gossip@jab.org
Subj: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive
On 19 Jul 2006 11:46:45 -0700, Jeff Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received a few private votes for keeping the .xml rss 2.0 feed, if we
eliminate
one of them.
I think we should deprecate the RDF variant (e.g. remove it from the FAQ) then
actually remove the feature once we're sure
Date: 7/18/06 10:37 am
To: gossip@jab.org
Subj: [Gossip] rdf vs. rss
We currently serve up two flavors of rss on The Mail Archive. Does anybody
have a strong preference on which one they use? Does it matter to you? Are
they virtually interchangeable?
We're considering dropping one
Hi Jeff,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/maillist.rdf doesnt load at
all.. I have tried many times. Could you update me.
Regards,
Rajiv
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REF: http://www.mail-archive.com/assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu
---
is there any RDF file created automatically for each list?
whr is it? can it be used live to create local list of mails in our site?
Babul
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
read the FAQ
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 19:56, Babul wrote:
REF: http://www.mail-archive.com/assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu
---
is there any RDF file created automatically for each list?
whr is it? can it be used live to create local list of mails in our site?
Babul
