Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
Okay, found the bug.
Great :-) thanks for sharing the reason.
[...] I have hopefully corrected the
code, so there should be good data going forward.
yes, confirmed. Works again for new messages.
Can you remind
Okay, found the bug.
On June 10th I made a change to deal with archives containing more
than one million messages. A piece of code had decided that one
million was a really big number and was starting to write scientific
notation to some internal log files. Unfortunately my change was
flawed and
Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion
about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg12770.html
