Hi folks,
I'm from LibreOffice community and noticed that links in archived mails
containing an @ are screwed up, assuming to hide an emailadress. This
isn't a good thing, because especially links pointing to other
mail-archive.com Mails are broken.
see for example:
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
[..]
Your feature request is valid and if you are feeling eager, feel free
to send in a patch. Otherwise we'll get to it when inspiration
strikes (and I have to warn you, inspiration can be rather slow to
strike sometimes...).
I know of :o)).
Hi Christian, *,
long time no see .. ;o))
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
[..]
http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html
AddressModifyCode
Hi Christian, *,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
[...]
I had a quick look at MHonArc sources and there are two possible
points where the behavriour can be tweaked.
One is the expression that identifies email-addresses in lib/mhinit.pl
[.. cleaning classes, running to a mirror to look whether
Hi Earl, *,
Earl Hood schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
You could also add the prefix to the method, as alternative to the
already existing cid case.
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
This one should work in any case
Hi Earl, *,
Did You read the mails?
Earl Hood schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Once can avoid the munging on the authoring side be URL escaping
the @ character with %40
shure harvesters don't know the trick? :o))
IIRC, the source of this discussion
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
There are two cases that are very common and handled poorly. One
is an http hyperlink to mail-archive.com as we've been discussing.
The other is a a mailto hyperlink. These are correctly obfuscated,
but end up as a broken link. Better to not have a link
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
Tested and live. Thanks guys.
The initial posting's broken link remains broken:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html
Does this mean that's true for
Hi Christian, *,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
[..]
The initial posting's broken link remains broken:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html
I personally did
Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
An: webs...@libreoffice.org
Hi Christian Lohmaier, *,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
I noticed the Archived-At: header tags don't work since 31 May
2011
for example
10 matches
Mail list logo
