On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:42 PM bonushenricus
wrote:
> Hi Anna
> I too immediately thought it was enough to compute it for the final step
> of the simulation,
> but I noticed that the same slope, same ditches, same rainfall, for two
> reservoirs at the same location, same length along a
Thank you, Anna.
r.sim.water finishes the simulation not at the end of the rainfall
event, in my case at 30 minutes, but at an earlier time. In my case, in
the smaller reservoir at 16 minutes, in the case of the more extensive
reservoir at 24 minutes. But the water keeps coming even after that. I
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:23 AM bonushenricus
wrote:
> Thank you, Anna.
> r.sim.water finishes the simulation not at the end of the rainfall event,
> in my case at 30 minutes, but at an earlier time. In my case, in the
> smaller reservoir at 16 minutes, in the case of the more extensive
>
Sorry
I was too impetuous.
I have to think about it more calmly.
In fact, I am too ignorant on the subject.
If it were the water blade, it wouldn't make sense for it to grow
faster in case of the smaller reservoir.
But I would expect, in my logic, that the water depth would again grow
in the
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 10:24, bonushenricus
wrote:
> Since I have the data in GRASS, I will try using the old geomhydas, hoping
> the modules will work in GRASS8, and then use the Mhydas models in
> OpenFluid.
>
I don't know anything about Geo-MHYDAS, but a lot of effort in GRASS GIS
goes into
Hello Enrico:
Anna knows this subject better than I do, but I
noticed a few problems with your command, so here are some
comments that might help to get a better result.
First, your man_value is way too high. You
probably want
