Chrome anyone? I see extensions are now part of the next beta...
I love Firefox, but its quite slow in comparison.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
greasemonkey-users group.
To post to this group, send email to greasemonkey-us...@googlegroups.com.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 18:28, miketosh goo...@toshpro.com wrote:
Chrome anyone? I see extensions are now part of the next beta...
I love Firefox, but its quite slow in comparison.
Try clicking on a userscript from within chrome/chromium. Userscripts
are already supported natively within
I use the ImageToolbar extension. Unfortunately, he removed the
auto-filename-increment-renamer feature and I wasn't able to put it back
in in the latest versions.
http://www.cusser.net/extensions/imagetoolbar/
Excaliburp wrote:
Hello guys. I am a complete newbie to Greasemonkey, so please
Until a recent release, Greasemonkey could run on locally stored HTML
pages. This was very handy, especially when combined with the Scrapbook
add-on. Does anyone know of a way to restore this behavior to a script?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Dec 29, 3:02 pm, John5342 john5...@googlemail.com wrote:
Try clicking on a userscript from within chrome/chromium. Userscripts
are already supported natively within chromium.
Not sure I follow. What I'm looking for is the automation feature. I
have a script that removes an IE function
Well, I sort of cheat: I run Apache on my (Windows) machine and serve
certain pages from there. It works pretty well for this and other
things, although Apache's configuration could be more intuitive. I've
heard good things of lighttpd, also, but have never tried it. And of
course there are
2009/12/30 cc carlcl...@lavabit.com:
Well, I sort of cheat: I run Apache on my (Windows) machine and serve
certain pages from there. It works pretty well for this and other
things, although Apache's configuration could be more intuitive. I've
heard good things of lighttpd, also, but have never
