This is quite odd... Why Kashmir is excluded from our consciousness? I would
like to believe that this report is not true... But if it is, this is done
in the name of Indian democracy, that we are responsible for...
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Anivar Aravind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
afthab,
u mean the report of mass grave at uri area in kashmir is wrong? or the
civil society responses and actions to it?
what is wrong if the reporting and the actions done in the name of indian
democracy?
On 5/1/08, Afthab Ellath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is quite odd... Why Kashmir is
'cold response' sounds like an allegation. before also some members came up
and did the same about the cold response on dalit related mails.
do u think silence is always condemnable?
On 5/1/08, Afthab Ellath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was mentioning about our cold response to this report...
when u writehistory of a region and remain silent on many aspects- movemnts,
historical figures, culture of particular socail grp.-- and still want to
escape quoting democratic right to be silent, such politcal mimicry is
highly condemnable. the civil society's concerns are clearly reflctd on
Torture in any form by the state is unacceptable in a democracy
National People's Tribunal on Torture held on April 28-29 at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh
Lenin
Raghuvanshi1/5/2008 9:45:59 AM(IST)
The state level tribunal on torture as part of the National People''s Tribunal on
Salim, I was not mentioning about this group... Do you think the coverage
of the media in such a serious matter justifiable?
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:00 PM, salimtk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'cold response' sounds like an allegation. before also some members came
up and did the same about the
*I was mentioning about our cold response to this report... Did we take it
as a serious matter? I worry, we didn't *
above line is aftab's.
when he said like OUR cold response and WE didnt take it serious, i cudnt
imagine that he was referring to the historians, media people,
intellectuals,
*nor did i imagine that he was referring the vacuumized representation of
marginalized people in history, which is clearly undebatable.*
When we talk about this exclusion, it is not total... It is selective...
Gujarat riots was covered, in length... Nandigram was covered... Even human
rights
There have been some members here who have shown tendencies towards grand
revolutions But that apart, when it comes to issues of caste - let me
draw a parallel to feminism - silence most often regardless of the mens rea
needs to be constructed as violence for no other reason, but how embedded
silence could be for multiple reasons. however, My silence on the issue of
muslims shows/expose my ideological/political inclinations. I should accept
that. Some people who proclaim to represent ALL cant digest it. They would
like to see themselves as saviours of ALL. Silence becomes a violent
10 matches
Mail list logo
